Noah Schachter vs Brandon Perez Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 24 Jul at 03:45 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
N. Schachter vs B. Perez

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

VEN
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Schachter 1 - 0 Perez
They have played 3 sets in total, with Noah Schachter winning 2 and Brandon Perez winning 1. The last match between Noah Schachter and Brandon Perez was at the M15 Santa Tecla, 24-07-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Noah Schachter getting the victory 5-7 7-5 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Schachter | 1 |
| Perez | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) M15 Santa Tecla(07-24-25)
N. Schachter vs B. Perez H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 51.41% (128-121) | Career Total W/L | 41.54% (81-114) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
N. Schachter vs B. Perez Match Preview:
- How do the players' second serve performances compare? In the last six months, Perez has a slight edge, winning 49.04% of points on second serve compared to Schachter’s 43.9%.
- Who performs better in return games? Schachter has won 46.27% of their opponent's second serve points, marginally outperforming Perez's 44.46%. For first serve returns, Schachter also leads with 26.26% over Perez's 24.41%.
- How do players handle pressure? Perez has saved a slightly higher percentage of breakpoints at 53.33%, compared to Schachter's 52.89%.
- What's their overall performance over the last year? Schachter has a better win rate, securing 46.77% of matches, whereas Perez has won 38.78%.
- Which surfaces suit them best? Schachter excels on hard courts with a 56% win rate, while Perez performs best on clay with a 48% win rate.
- How does their opponent quality differ? Schachter's opponents have had a higher average rank of 347.08, compared to Perez's at 366.61.
- Who prevails in deciding sets? In closer matches, Schachter has won 39% of deciding sets, whereas Perez has a lower success rate at 31%.
- What about break point conversion? Schachter is more effective, converting 38.1% of opportunities, while Perez trails with 28.71%.
Editorial Prediction (July 24, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match between Schachter and Perez presents intriguing challenges and opportunities for both players. Schachter showcases formidable skills in return games and break point conversions, providing them a tactical advantage during critical moments.
Perez, however, demonstrates a stronger second serve performance, which may prove crucial against opponents with aggressive returns like Schachter. Moreover, Perez's slightly better performance under pressure indicates resilience in tense situations.
Considering the overall statistics and surface performance, Schachter shows a consistent edge in several departments, notably in deciding sets and break point conversions. This efficiency alongside their experience against higher-ranked opponents feeds into the analysis.
Based on these factors, Schachter is predicted to leverage their diverse strengths effectively and is most likely to win this upcoming match against Perez.
Noah Schachter vs Brandon Perez Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
N. Schachter vs B. Perez H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 18 | Games Won | 14 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 6 |
| 7 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 2:34:13 | Average Match Time | 2:34:13 |
| 50% (46/92) | 1st Serve % | 58% (57/98) |
| 76% (35/46) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (37/57) |
| 48% (22/46) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (18/41) |
| 45% (5/11) | Break Pts Won % | 100% (4/4) |
| 44% (43/98) | Return Points Win % | 38% (35/92) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
N. Schachter Recent Matches Played
B. Perez Recent Matches Played

N. Schachter vs B. Perez Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 51.41% (128/121) | YTD Win/Loss | 41.54% (81/114) |
| 51.76% (294/274) | Sets Win/Loss | 44.02% (195/248) |
| 51.18% (2710/2585) | Games Win/Loss | 48.07% (2051/2216) |
| 55.13% (86/70) | Hard Win/Loss | 39.05% (41/64) |
| 47.62% (30/33) | Clay Win/Loss | 45.78% (38/45) |
| 40.00% (12/18) | Indoor Hard W/L | 28.57% (2/5) |
| 0.31 | Aces Per Game | 0.22 |
| 792 | Aces Total | 455 |
| 0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
| 620 | Total Double Faults | 390 |
| 1:15:59 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 354.49 | Average Opponent Rank | 291.89 |
| 60% (7359/12210) | 1st Serve % | 61% (4696/7717) |
| 68% (5033/7359) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (3050/4696) |
| 46% (2250/4851) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (1417/3020) |
| 41% (481/1182) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 39% (237/606) |
| 40% (4795/12116) | Return Points Win % | 36% (2692/7452) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 37.50% (15/25) | Challenger W/L | 14.29% (2/12) |
| 54.07% (113/96) | Futures W/L | 44.13% (79/100) |
| 51% (127/247) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 42% (81/191) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/4) |
| 56% (24/43) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 44% (24/54) |
| 46% (32/70) | Deciding Set Win % | 41% (20/49) |
| 84% (131/110) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (86/72) |
| 16% (131/21) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (86/14) |
| 15% (118/18) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 8% (109/9) |