Noah Rubin vs Jaroslav Pospisil Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L W W L W L L
Form
L L L W L L L L L LHead-2-Head: Rubin 1 - 0 Pospisil
They have played 2 sets in total, with Rubin winning 2 and Pospisil winning 0. The last match between Rubin and Pospisil was at the Oeiras 1 Challenger, 28-03-2022, Round: Q3, Surface: Clay, with Noah Rubin getting the victory 6-1 7-5.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Noah Rubin | 1 |
| Jaroslav Pospisil | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Oeiras 1 Challenger(28-03-2022)
Noah Rubin
Jaroslav Pospisil
6
1
7
5
| Rubin | Stats | Pospisil |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 734 | Ranking | 860 |
| 125 | Highest Rank | 103 |
| 29 | Age | 44 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 4 | Titles | 24 |
| 56% (215-169) | Career Total W/L | 61% (573-371) |
| $398,175 | Career Prize Money | $28,310 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Yunchaokete VS Djere PREDICTION Grass
Mallorca Championships - Mallorca atp
22 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Muller VS Safiullin PREDICTION Grass
Mallorca Championships - Mallorca atp
22 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 7-5 |
Stats 
Noah Rubin
Player
Jaroslav Pospisil
55%
(
38 of
69)
1st Serve %
63%
(
34 of
54)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
22 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
73
Total Points Won
50
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 6 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:30:49 | Average Match Time | 1:30:49 |
| 55% (38/69) | 1st Serve % | 63% (34/54) |
| 71% (27/38) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (20/34) |
| 65% (20/31) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (8/20) |
| 80% (4/5) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (1/3) |
| 48% (26/54) | Return Points Win % | 32% (22/69) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Noah Rubin Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Lukas Pokorny
Player
Noah Rubin
59%
(
45 of
76)
1st Serve %
64%
(
72 of
112)
9
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
6
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
45 of
72)
39%
(
12 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
41%
(
31 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
50 of
112)
95
Total Points Won
93
|
1-6 7-6(3) 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Denis Kudla
Player
Noah Rubin
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
93%
(
25 of
27)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Noah Rubin
Player
Matija Pecotic
60%
(
66 of
110)
1st Serve %
53%
(
56 of
105)
1
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
7
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
40 of
56)
50%
(
22 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
42%
(
46 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
45 of
105)
109
Total Points Won
106
|
5-7 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Noah Rubin
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve %
69%
(
37 of
54)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
26 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Noah Rubin
Player
Peter Bertran
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
58%
(
19 of
33)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Noah Rubin
Player
Elio Jose Ribeiro Lago
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
51%
(
25 of
49)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
James Tracy
Player
Noah Rubin
61%
(
52 of
85)
1st Serve %
78%
(
83 of
106)
2
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
52 of
83)
70%
(
23 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
29 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
106)
100
Total Points Won
91
|
6-7(5) 6-4 4-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Noah Rubin
Player
Kyle Kang
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve %
48%
(
23 of
48)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
20 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Jaroslav Pospisil Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Martin Krumich
Player
Jaroslav Pospisil
45%
(
30 of
67)
1st Serve %
54%
(
28 of
52)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
12)
40%
(
27 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Edoardo Lavagno
Player
Jaroslav Pospisil
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve %
45%
(
23 of
51)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
12 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Vitaliy Sachko
Player
Jaroslav Pospisil
74%
(
43 of
58)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
71
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Oleksandr Ovcharenko
Player
Jaroslav Pospisil
61%
(
44 of
72)
1st Serve %
49%
(
26 of
53)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
31 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
68
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Jaroslav Pospisil
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
52%
(
37 of
71)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Noah Rubin
Player
Jaroslav Pospisil
55%
(
38 of
69)
1st Serve %
63%
(
34 of
54)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
22 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
73
Total Points Won
50
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jaroslav Pospisil
Player
Dragos Nicolae Madaras
49%
(
34 of
70)
1st Serve %
58%
(
36 of
62)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
39%
(
27 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Markos Kalovelonis
Player
Jaroslav Pospisil
49%
(
38 of
77)
1st Serve %
60%
(
57 of
95)
12
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
10
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
39 of
57)
41%
(
16 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
32 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
41 of
95)
86
Total Points Won
86
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56% (215/169) | Win/Loss | 61% (573/371) |
| 54% (484/408) | Sets Win/Loss | 59% (1279/875) |
| 51% (4319/4110) | Games Win/Loss | 55% (10834/9029) |
| 55% (113/92) | Hard Win/Loss | 68% (111/53) |
| 58% (59/43) | Clay Win/Loss | 62% (392/242) |
| 56% (34/27) | Indoor Hard W/L | 48% (62/67) |
| 56% (9/7) | Grass Win/Loss | 47% (8/9) |
| 0.26 | Aces Per Game | 0.15 |
| 1080 | Aces Total | 1442 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.14 |
| 940 | Total Double Faults | 1403 |
| 1:15:29 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 548.27 | Average Opponent Rank | 593.21 |
| 60% (13176/21888) | 1st Serve % | 56% (14894/26434) |
| 68% (8955/13176) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (10372/14894) |
| 50% (4394/8712) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (5667/11540) |
| 43% (894/2089) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (1289/2873) |
| 39% (8443/21613) | Return Points Win % | 42% (11130/26539) |
| 42% (13/18) | Slam W/L | 21% (5/19) |
| 45% (5/6) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 48% (22/24) | Main Tour W/L | 48% (21/23) |
| 56% (106/84) | Challenger W/L | 50% (192/189) |
| 65% (69/37) | Futures W/L | 72% (355/139) |
| 57% (207/363) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (565/925) |
| 29% (5/17) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 29% (2/7) |
| 57% (63/110) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (122/253) |
| 57% (61/107) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (136/273) |
| 83% (218/182) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (569/494) |
| 17% (218/36) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (569/74) |
| 19% (166/32) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (373/77) |
Rubin vs. Pospisil Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
