Nishesh Basavareddy vs Mitchell Krueger Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W W L W L L L L
Form
L W W W W L L L W LHead To Head: Basavareddy 1 - 0 Krueger
They have played 2 sets in total, with Basavareddy winning 2 and Krueger winning 0. The last match between Basavareddy and Krueger was at the Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome, 05-05-2025, Round: Q1 round, Surface: Clay, with Nishesh Basavareddy getting the victory 7-5 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Nishesh Basavareddy | 1 |
| Mitchell Krueger | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome(05-05-2025)
Nishesh Basavareddy
Mitchell Krueger
7
5
6
1
| Basavareddy | Stats | Krueger |
|---|---|---|
| 48% (12-13) | YTD Win/Loss | 47% (15-17) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 105 | Ranking | 163 |
| 100 | Highest Rank | 135 |
| 20 | Age | 31 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 2 | Titles | 9 |
| 64% (75-42) | Career Total W/L | 53% (438-392) |
| $74,315 | Career Prize Money | $1,082,108 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Shelton VS Lehecka PREDICTION Grass
Boss Open - Stuttgart atp
13 Jun 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Birrell VS Yuan PREDICTION Grass
Libema Open - 's-Hertogenbosch wta
11 Jun 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Basavareddy VS Krueger H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-1 |
Stats 
Nishesh Basavareddy
Player
Mitchell Krueger
69%
(
70 of
102)
1st Serve %
68%
(
40 of
59)
6
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
0
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
16)
40%
(
41 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
59)
85
Total Points Won
76
|
||||
Basavareddy VS Krueger H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 6 |
| 6 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 2:5:8 | Average Match Time | 2:5:8 |
| 69% (70/102) | 1st Serve % | 68% (40/59) |
| 67% (47/70) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (26/40) |
| 44% (14/32) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (9/19) |
| 50% (3/6) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/16) |
| 41% (24/59) | Return Points Win % | 40% (41/102) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Basavareddy vs Krueger Match Preview :
Let's dive into the intriguing world of tennis statistics for our match preview. How does second serve performance paint a picture of potential outcomes? In the last six months, Krueger has secured a win rate of 48.54% of points on their second serve, giving them a slight edge over Basavareddy's 43.33%. This particular statistic is often pivotal in making accurate match predictions because it often reflects a player's reliability under pressure.
But what about their return game? Here, Krueger also leads, having claimed 47.34% of their opponents' second serve points, compared to Basavareddy's 44.86%. First serve returns reinforce this trend, with Krueger winning 26.82% and Basavareddy 24.16%. These return stats are crucial in head-to-head matchups, often highlighting who has the upper hand when it comes to maintaining and breaking service games.
When the pressure is on, both players show resilient performances, yet Krueger again has the upper hand. Saving 57.35% of breakpoints, compared to Basavareddy’s 53.79%, Krueger demonstrates slightly better nerve and tactical execution, a useful indicator for those interested in in-game betting strategies. However, when taking a broader look at their match-winning capabilities over the past year, Basavareddy has a strong track record, winning 68.75% of matches as compared to Krueger’s 51.56%.
Surface preferences also come into play. Krueger's career highlights show stability on clay, with a win percentage of 56%, though they show less affinity for grass, managing only a 38% success rate. Meanwhile, Basavareddy shines on hard courts, where they've achieved an impressive 71% win rate, but clay seems to be their kryptonite, with a mere 33% of matches won.
Examining the level of play, Krueger's matches have mostly been in Challenger and ITF tournaments, securing a 48.39% win rate in this category. Basavareddy, however, outperforms at the same level, boasting a 74.14% win rate. Considering the quality of opponents, Krueger has faced players with an average rank of 226.88, slightly better than Basavareddy's opponents, ranked on average at 234.04.
If this battle reaches a deciding set, historical performances suggest Basavareddy has the upper hand, securing 65% of such sets, compared to Krueger's 41%. Such statistics could be particularly persuasive for those inclined towards live betting during high-stakes moments. Moreover, when it comes to converting opportunities, Krueger edges out again with a 38.35% breakpoint conversion rate, against Basavareddy’s 29.8%.
In light of all these statistical insights, the edge appears to be with Krueger, particularly due to their superior second serve performance and return stats, essential indicators for match favorites. Nonetheless, the dynamic nature of tennis means anything can happen, but based on these figures, Krueger could very well emerge victorious in this head-to-head showdown.
Basavareddy vs Krueger Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Nishesh Basavareddy Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Nuno Borges
Player
Nishesh Basavareddy
80%
(
43 of
54)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
69)
12
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
7
86%
(
37 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
20%
(
11 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
69)
73
Total Points Won
50
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Andrea Collarini
Player
Nishesh Basavareddy
71%
(
66 of
93)
1st Serve %
68%
(
74 of
109)
2
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
4
73%
(
48 of
66)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
53 of
74)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
28 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
39 of
109)
104
Total Points Won
98
|
7-5 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rinky Hijikata
Player
Nishesh Basavareddy
63%
(
60 of
95)
1st Serve %
59%
(
54 of
91)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
39 of
54)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
38%
(
36 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
91)
95
Total Points Won
91
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Vit Kopriva
Player
Nishesh Basavareddy
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve %
48%
(
30 of
62)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nishesh Basavareddy
Player
Mitchell Krueger
69%
(
70 of
102)
1st Serve %
68%
(
40 of
59)
6
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
0
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
16)
40%
(
41 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
59)
85
Total Points Won
76
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Stan Wawrinka
Player
Nishesh Basavareddy
59%
(
40 of
68)
1st Serve %
56%
(
50 of
90)
8
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
40 of
90)
86
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(8) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nishesh Basavareddy
Player
Albert Ramos-Vinolas
56%
(
41 of
73)
1st Serve %
65%
(
48 of
74)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
35 of
48)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
24 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
74)
79
Total Points Won
68
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nishesh Basavareddy
Player
Otto Virtanen
59%
(
54 of
91)
1st Serve %
49%
(
36 of
74)
3
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
4
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
28 of
36)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
31 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
26 of
74)
86
Total Points Won
79
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Mitchell Krueger Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Karue Sell
Player
Mitchell Krueger
51%
(
35 of
69)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
74%
(
25 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
32%
(
22 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
72
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Tung-Lin Wu
66%
(
60 of
91)
1st Serve %
68%
(
71 of
105)
10
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
5
73%
(
44 of
60)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
45 of
71)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
34%
(
31 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
105)
104
Total Points Won
92
|
7-6(4) 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patrick Kypson
Player
Mitchell Krueger
59%
(
51 of
86)
1st Serve %
60%
(
61 of
101)
13
Aces
14
3
Double Faults
2
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
49 of
61)
66%
(
23 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
28%
(
24 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
36 of
101)
98
Total Points Won
89
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Mitchell Krueger
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
70%
(
33 of
47)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Cristian Garin
Player
Mitchell Krueger
66%
(
63 of
95)
1st Serve %
72%
(
79 of
110)
4
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
4
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
49 of
79)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
39%
(
37 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
47 of
110)
105
Total Points Won
100
|
7-6(3) 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Hady Habib
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
5
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Yibing Wu
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve %
62%
(
41 of
66)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
64
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Daniel Merida Aguilar
81%
(
63 of
78)
1st Serve %
77%
(
56 of
73)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
36 of
56)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
28 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
73)
83
Total Points Won
68
|
3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 64% (75/42) | Win/Loss | 53% (438/392) |
| 62% (168/104) | Sets Win/Loss | 53% (1035/922) |
| 54% (1373/1159) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (9567/9148) |
| 71% (54/22) | Hard Win/Loss | 54% (272/233) |
| 31% (4/9) | Clay Win/Loss | 56% (124/97) |
| 63% (17/10) | Indoor Hard W/L | 41% (33/47) |
| 0% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 38% (9/15) |
| 0.37 | Aces Per Game | 0.31 |
| 457 | Aces Total | 2872 |
| 0.31 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 390 | Total Double Faults | 1672 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:23:14 |
| 277.5 | Average Opponent Rank | 518.54 |
| 58% (4506/7790) | 1st Serve % | 62% (29708/48088) |
| 71% (3219/4506) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (20532/29708) |
| 52% (1711/3284) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (9335/18380) |
| 44% (358/815) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (1807/4386) |
| 41% (3195/7853) | Return Points Win % | 38% (18607/48532) |
| 40% (2/3) | Slam W/L | 46% (27/32) |
| 25% (1/3) | Masters W/L | 39% (12/19) |
| 59% (10/7) | Main Tour W/L | 49% (36/37) |
| 70% (55/24) | Challenger W/L | 49% (236/242) |
| 58% (7/5) | Futures W/L | 67% (127/62) |
| 66% (73/111) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 53% (427/813) |
| 20% (1/5) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 55% (6/11) |
| 42% (14/33) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 46% (130/280) |
| 55% (17/31) | Deciding Set Win % | 45% (129/288) |
| 83% (78/65) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 81% (446/362) |
| 15% (78/12) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 19% (446/84) |
| 26% (39/10) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (384/72) |
Basavareddy vs. Krueger Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
