Prediction of Nino Ehrenschneider [702nd] vs Naoki Tajima [881st] Head-to-Head At The
By Wojtek Kolan

Form
W W W W L W L L W L
Form
W L W W L W L W W LHead-2-Head: Ehrenschneider 1 - 0 Tajima
They have played 2 sets in total, with Ehrenschneider winning 2 and Tajima winning 0. The last match between Ehrenschneider and Tajima was at the M25 Luan, 11-03-2025, Q3, Hard with Nino Ehrenschneider getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Nino Ehrenschneider | 1 |
Naoki Tajima | 0 |
Ehrenschneider | Stats | Tajima |
---|---|---|
76% (31-10) | YTD Win/Loss | 66% (19-10) |
1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
702 | Ranking | 881 |
702 | Highest Rank | 604 |
24 | Age | 24 |
- | Plays | R |
1 | Titles | 0 |
71% (84-35) | Career Total W/L | 50% (151-152) |
$0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
Ehrenschneider VS Tajima H2H Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 6-4 |
Ehrenschneider VS Tajima H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
12 | Games Won | 7 |
0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Nino Ehrenschneider vs Naoki Tajima Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Ehrenschneider 1 - 0 Tajima
Editorial Prediction:
In the realm of tennis analysis, an intriguing matchup awaits between Ehrenschneider and Tajima. Recent statistical insights reveal a compelling narrative for predicting the likely outcome of their encounter. Ehrenschneider has showcased superior second serve performance over the past six months, claiming victory on 49% of points, while Tajima lags behind with a 43.2% success rate. This performance metric can be a strong indicator in forecasting match outcomes.
Examining their return game capabilities, Ehrenschneider has secured 41.63% of points on their opponent's second serve, whereas Tajima has slightly outperformed with 42.68%. However, when it comes to first serve returns, Tajima excels with a 29.4% success rate compared to Ehrenschneider’s 23.98%. Such statistics offer valuable insights into who might have an edge in this head-to-head clash.
In scenarios where players face pressure, Ehrenschneider's ability to save breakpoints stands out significantly, managing to save 60.12% of them recently, while Tajima has only succeeded 45.52% of the time. This metric is invaluable for predicting performance under critical in-game conditions. Over the past year, Ehrenschneider’s match-winning rate has been impressive at 77.22% (61 wins to 18 losses), in contrast to Tajima's 54.39% (31 wins to 26 losses), providing a holistic view of their overall performance trends.
Surface preference also plays a role in these predictions. Ehrenschneider has thrived on indoor hard courts with a winning percentage of 76% and has fared slightly less on hard courts. Tajima has shown his best results on hard surfaces, albeit with a more modest winning percentage of 51%, and has struggled on grass. The caliber of opponents faced further distinguishes these players, with Ehrenschneider encountering higher-ranked opponents, averaging a rank of 245.96, compared to Tajima's average opponent rank of 327.74 over the past year.
Deciding set performances can also swing a match prediction. Ehrenschneider has a slight edge here, having won 47% of deciding sets, while Tajima's rate is lower at 38%. Additionally, breakpoint conversion rates offer a glimpse into pivotal moments, with Ehrenschneider converting 29.7% of opportunities, against Tajima’s more efficient 44.12%. Considering these comprehensive statistics, Ehrenschneider's consistent performance on various fronts suggests they might hold the upper hand in this impending match.
Nino Ehrenschneider Recent Matches Played
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | 7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | |||
R1 | 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 | 6-7(2) 6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | |||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Qian Sun
Player
Nino Ehrenschneider
54%
(
35 of
65)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
29 of
39)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
21 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Nino Ehrenschneider
Player
Fumin Jiang
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
72%
(
13 of
18)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
21 of
54)
58
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Rio Noguchi
Player
Nino Ehrenschneider
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve %
73%
(
41 of
56)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
85%
(
34 of
40)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
10 of
15)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
18 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
18 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Nino Ehrenschneider
Player
Linang Xiao
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
78%
(
42 of
54)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 1-6 6-3 10-4 | H2H |
view more
Naoki Tajima Recent Matches Played
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Gianmarco Ferrari
Player
Naoki Tajima
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve %
71%
(
32 of
45)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
11 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
45
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Naoki Tajima
Player
Matteo Mura
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve %
54%
(
25 of
46)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
17 of
22)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
8 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
53
Total Points Won
25
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Matteo Mesaglio
Player
Naoki Tajima
51%
(
40 of
79)
1st Serve %
47%
(
27 of
58)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
8
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
41%
(
32 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 3-6 7-5 10-4 | H2H | |||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Hyeon Chung
Player
Naoki Tajima
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
49%
(
23 of
47)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-6(0) 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Keisuke Saitoh
Player
Naoki Tajima
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
66
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Naoki Tajima
Player
Zhengyu Sun
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve %
50%
(
20 of
40)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
91%
(
21 of
23)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
18%
(
7 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
54
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H |
view more

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
71% (84/35) | Win/Loss | 50% (151/152) |
68% (182/84) | Sets Win/Loss | 50% (345/340) |
57% (1458/1110) | Games Win/Loss | 50% (3174/3142) |
0.29 | Aces Per Game | 0.26 |
363 | Aces Total | 785 |
0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.28 |
225 | Total Double Faults | 849 |
1:16:11 | Average Match Time | 1:17:46 |
319.7 | Average Opponent Rank | 415.36 |
65% (3761/5773) | 1st Serve % | 54% (8239/15318) |
71% (2678/3761) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (5556/8239) |
54% (1081/2012) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (3384/7078) |
42% (236/562) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (687/1487) |
39% (2267/5858) | Return Points Win % | 40% (6194/15435) |
70% (82/117) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (147/295) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 25% (1/4) |
60% (26/43) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 58% (26/45) |
46% (13/28) | Deciding Set Win % | 45% (36/80) |
88% (86/76) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (155/129) |
12% (86/10) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (155/26) |
24% (33/8) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (148/21) |
Other Predictions
- Loading news...