D. Added
To Win
TBD
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W W W W L W LForm
W L W W W L L L L WThey have played 3 sets in total, with Ehrenschneider winning 2 and Added winning 1. The last match between Ehrenschneider and Added was at the M15 Bucharest, 14-02-2025, Quarterfinals, I.hard with Nino Ehrenschneider getting the victory 6-7(4) 6-4 6-4.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Nino Ehrenschneider | 1 |
Dan Added | 0 |
M15 Bucharest(14-02-2025)
Ehrenschneider | Stats | Added |
---|---|---|
79% (30-8) | YTD Win/Loss | 58% (11-8) |
1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
709 | Ranking | 501 |
709 | Highest Rank | 240 |
23 | Age | 25 |
- | Plays | R |
1 | Titles | 8 |
72% (83-33) | Career Total W/L | 58% (300-221) |
$0 | Career Prize Money | $34,000 |
0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
- / Second
Miami Open - Miami wta
26 Mar 2025 / Quarterfinals
Miami Open - Miami wta
26 Mar 2025 / Quarterfinals
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-7(4) 6-4 6-4 |
![]() ![]()
Nino Ehrenschneider
Player
Dan Added
69%
(
61 of
89)
1st Serve %
65%
(
67 of
103)
5
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
2
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
46 of
67)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
28 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
35 of
103)
96
Total Points Won
96
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 1 |
18 | Games Won | 15 |
5 | Aces (Total) | 9 |
5 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
2:25:30 | Average Match Time | 2:25:30 |
69% (61/89) | 1st Serve % | 65% (67/103) |
70% (43/61) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (46/67) |
64% (18/28) | 2nd Serve Win % | 61% (22/36) |
43% (3/7) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 67% (2/3) |
34% (35/103) | Return Points Win % | 31% (28/89) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Second serve performance recent form: Recent form analysis reveals that Ehrenschneider has exhibited a commendable prowess with an impressive 55.41% success rate in winning points on their second serve, surpassing Added's 51.35% achievement. This statistical fact showcases a significant correlation between this particular parameter and the accuracy of match predictions.
Return game stats recent form: Examining the return game statistics in recent form, it becomes evident that Ehrenschneider has displayed remarkable competence by triumphing in 47.76% of their opponents' second serve points, while Added has managed to secure 51.04% in similar circumstances. Moreover, the numbers for first serve returns stand at 32.73% and 34.61% respectively, thereby furnishing a powerful tool to determine the favored contender in this enigmatic head-to-head matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Considering the ability to navigate high-pressure situations, Ehrenschneider is noted for saving an impressive 65.1% of breakpoints in recent form. Conversely, Added lags slightly behind, having saved 58.49% of similar critical junctures. This particular statistic proves to be indispensable when making in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the course of the past year, Ehrenschneider has exhibited a stellar performance, winning a staggering 76.19% of matches (with a win/loss ratio of 48/15). Meanwhile, Added has enjoyed a commendable 55.88% success rate (winning 38 matches while losing 30). This overview provides a holistic prediction of the head-to-head encounter.
Best surface: Analyzing the preferred playing surface of each player, it is discernible that Ehrenschneider excels on clay courts, boasting an impressive 74% win rate (W/L 14/5). Conversely, their performance on hard courts witnesses a slight dip, with a still noteworthy 70% win rate (W/L 45/19). Added experiences contrasting fortunes, with hard courts serving as their strongest terrain, securing a commendable 61% win rate (W/L 106/67), while displays on grass courts present a challenge, evidenced by a 33% win rate (W/L 1/2).
Player level: Over the previous year, Ehrenschneider has predominantly participated in the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, commanding an exceptional 76.19% victory rate (winning 48 matches and losing 15). In comparison, Added has competed primarily in the same category of tournaments, mustering a still respectable 59.52% success rate (winning 25 matches and losing 17). When assessing players' statistics to predict the favorite, it is essential to consider the relative significance of the events they have participated in.
Opponent quality stats: Within the last 12 months, Ehrenschneider has faced opponents with an average ranking of 90.33, exemplifying the significant challenges they have encountered. In contrast, Added has confronted players with an average ranking of 190.57, indicating the formidable competition they have encountered.
Deciding set performance vs all players: For those keen on live predictions and betting, it is noteworthy that Ehrenschneider has demonstrated a commendable ability to clinch deciding sets, having triumphed in 38% of such scenarios over the past 12 months. Added, on the other hand, boasts a superior record in concluding sets, winning 56% of them across all matches played on the tour.
Current event H2H stats: While prior player performance serves as a valuable tool in predicting tennis matches, it is imperative to examine current event statistics when formulating predictions during an ongoing competition. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the section below for the latest updates if the players have already participated in matches in the present tournament. Moreover, it should be noted that certain players exhibit superior performances at specific events, a factor that should be taken into account when predicting the final outcome.
Break point conversion: Considering recent form, Ehrenschneider has capitalized on 42.25% of their breakpoint opportunities, while Added has managed a slightly lower conversion rate of 41.09% when it comes to breaking their opponents' serve. This particular statistic serves as a revealing indicator for in-game live betting tips whenever either player finds themselves with a breakpoint opportunity.
If you possess an inclination towards models that facilitate the prediction of tennis matches, you might find this article to be a profound starting point. However, please be advised that it caters specifically to avid statistics enthusiasts.
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
![]() ![]()
Qian Sun
Player
Nino Ehrenschneider
54%
(
35 of
65)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
29 of
39)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
21 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Nino Ehrenschneider
Player
Fumin Jiang
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
72%
(
13 of
18)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
21 of
54)
58
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Rio Noguchi
Player
Nino Ehrenschneider
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve %
73%
(
41 of
56)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
85%
(
34 of
40)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
10 of
15)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
18 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
18 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Nino Ehrenschneider
Player
Linang Xiao
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
78%
(
42 of
54)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 1-6 6-3 10-4 | H2H | |||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Egor Agafonov
Player
Nino Ehrenschneider
44%
(
19 of
43)
1st Serve %
70%
(
39 of
56)
1
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
89%
(
17 of
19)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
23 of
56)
55
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Nino Ehrenschneider
Player
Wishaya Trongcharoenchaikul
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
73)
5
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
4
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
34 of
47)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
73)
77
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Nino Ehrenschneider
Player
Kaichi Uchida
63%
(
72 of
114)
1st Serve %
63%
(
71 of
113)
17
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
8
72%
(
52 of
72)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
50 of
71)
45%
(
19 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
15 of
42)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
38%
(
43 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
48 of
113)
119
Total Points Won
108
|
5-7 6-3 7-6(0) | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Harry Wendelken
Player
Dan Added
58%
(
22 of
38)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
8 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Louis Dussin
Player
Dan Added
72%
(
76 of
105)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
78)
3
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
3
67%
(
51 of
76)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
34 of
45)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
38 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
29 of
78)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Matteo Martineau
Player
Dan Added
56%
(
58 of
104)
1st Serve %
59%
(
75 of
128)
7
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
5
78%
(
45 of
58)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
49 of
75)
48%
(
22 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
36%
(
37 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
53 of
128)
120
Total Points Won
112
|
6-7(5) 7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Daniil Glinka
Player
Dan Added
64%
(
71 of
111)
1st Serve %
55%
(
62 of
113)
11
Aces
10
5
Double Faults
1
76%
(
54 of
71)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
46 of
62)
53%
(
21 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
32%
(
36 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
41 of
113)
116
Total Points Won
108
|
6-4 5-7 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Dan Added
Player
Giovanni Fonio
59%
(
54 of
92)
1st Serve %
56%
(
54 of
96)
10
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
36 of
54)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
30 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
96)
99
Total Points Won
89
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Dan Added
Player
Manuel Plunger
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve %
48%
(
23 of
48)
7
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
7 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Dan Added
Player
Tim Handel
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve %
47%
(
34 of
72)
9
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
72)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Nino Ehrenschneider
Player
Dan Added
69%
(
61 of
89)
1st Serve %
65%
(
67 of
103)
5
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
2
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
46 of
67)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
28 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
35 of
103)
96
Total Points Won
96
|
6-7(4) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Dan Added
Player
Bogdan Pavel
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve %
57%
(
47 of
83)
5
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
1
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
17 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
83)
80
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
72% (83/33) | Win/Loss | 58% (300/221) |
69% (179/80) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (682/524) |
57% (1421/1070) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (5972/5430) |
70% (50/21) | Hard Win/Loss | 61% (106/67) |
74% (14/5) | Clay Win/Loss | 52% (66/61) |
73% (19/7) | Indoor Hard W/L | 58% (127/91) |
0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) |
0.3 | Aces Per Game | 0.43 |
363 | Aces Total | 2380 |
0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.15 |
225 | Total Double Faults | 863 |
1:18:9 | Average Match Time | 1:36:39 |
309.96 | Average Opponent Rank | 495.35 |
65% (3761/5773) | 1st Serve % | 59% (20332/34447) |
71% (2678/3761) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (14310/20332) |
54% (1081/2012) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (7046/14114) |
42% (236/562) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (1437/3366) |
39% (2267/5858) | Return Points Win % | 40% (13759/34418) |
0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) |
0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) |
0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
33% (1/2) | Challenger W/L | 43% (54/73) |
73% (82/31) | Futures W/L | 63% (245/146) |
71% (81/114) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (295/515) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (3/3) |
62% (24/39) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (91/168) |
48% (13/27) | Deciding Set Win % | 49% (80/164) |
89% (84/75) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (304/263) |
11% (84/9) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (304/41) |
25% (32/8) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (217/37) |
See recent tennis photos of Ehrenschneider and Added