Prediction of Nina Vargova [339th] vs Tena Lukas [285th] Head-to-Head At The
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L L W L W L W L
Form
W W L W W W L L L LHead To Head: Vargova 1 - 0 Lukas
They have played 2 sets in total, with Vargova winning 2 and Lukas winning 0. The last match between Vargova and Lukas was at the W35 Antalya, 14-02-2025, Quarterfinals, Clay with Nina Vargova getting the victory 7-5 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Nina Vargova | 1 |
| Tena Lukas | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-4 |
Stats 
Nina Vargova
Player
Tena Lukas
55%
(
35 of
64)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
75)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
8
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
47%
(
30 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
75)
74
Total Points Won
65
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 9 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 8 |
| 2:13:16 | Average Match Time | 2:13:16 |
| 55% (35/64) | 1st Serve % | 57% (43/75) |
| 63% (22/35) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (24/43) |
| 41% (12/29) | 2nd Serve Win % | 34% (11/32) |
| 54% (7/13) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 83% (5/6) |
| 53% (40/75) | Return Points Win % | 47% (30/64) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Nina Vargova vs Tena Lukas Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Vargova 1 - 0 Lukas
Editorial Prediction:
Nina Vargova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Joelle Steur
Player
Nina Vargova
88%
(
38 of
43)
1st Serve %
60%
(
26 of
43)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
55%
(
21 of
38)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
40%
(
2 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
47%
(
20 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
48
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nina Vargova
Player
Silvia Alejo
54%
(
25 of
46)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tara Wuerth
Player
Nina Vargova
73%
(
77 of
106)
1st Serve %
66%
(
80 of
122)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
62%
(
48 of
77)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
44 of
80)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
43%
(
46 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
58 of
122)
118
Total Points Won
110
|
6-4 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nina Vargova
Player
Ilay Yoruk
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve %
66%
(
29 of
44)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marina Bassols Ribera
Player
Nina Vargova
52%
(
25 of
48)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
72)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
60%
(
15 of
25)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
44%
(
21 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
39 of
72)
66
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nina Vargova
Player
Lavinia Tanasie
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Valentina Ryser
Player
Nina Vargova
60%
(
46 of
77)
1st Serve %
61%
(
49 of
80)
5
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
5
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
40%
(
31 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
80)
84
Total Points Won
73
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nina Vargova
Player
Nikola Breckova
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
70%
(
44 of
63)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
71
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Linda Klimovicova
Player
Nina Vargova
60%
(
40 of
67)
1st Serve %
69%
(
57 of
83)
7
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
4
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
39 of
83)
81
Total Points Won
69
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Tena Lukas Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Aliona Bolsova
Player
Tena Lukas
76%
(
68 of
89)
1st Serve %
61%
(
55 of
90)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
8
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
24%
(
5 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
10 of
35)
64%
(
9 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
46%
(
41 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
48 of
90)
96
Total Points Won
83
|
6-0 6-7(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kaitlin Quevedo
Player
Tena Lukas
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
54%
(
50 of
92)
0
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
15
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
12 of
42)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
46%
(
35 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
48 of
92)
89
Total Points Won
79
|
3-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Susan Bandecchi
Player
Tena Lukas
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve %
55%
(
28 of
51)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
57%
(
16 of
28)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
36%
(
15 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
33
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anastasiia Sobolieva
Player
Tena Lukas
63%
(
74 of
118)
1st Serve %
68%
(
86 of
126)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
51%
(
38 of
74)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
50 of
86)
55%
(
24 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
14 of
40)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
47%
(
56 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
62 of
126)
124
Total Points Won
120
|
7-6(6) 6-7(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tena Lukas
Player
Laura Pigossi
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tena Lukas
Player
Amina Anshba
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
73%
(
45 of
62)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tena Lukas
Player
Kitti Molnar
55%
(
35 of
64)
1st Serve %
56%
(
42 of
75)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
54%
(
19 of
35)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
45%
(
29 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
36 of
75)
71
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 4-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Amarissa Kiara Toth
Player
Tena Lukas
78%
(
43 of
55)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
74)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
22 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
42 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tena Lukas
Player
Ilay Yoruk
45%
(
40 of
88)
1st Serve %
65%
(
69 of
106)
2
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
6
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
40 of
69)
48%
(
23 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
37)
37%
(
7 of
19)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
35 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
54 of
106)
107
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 5-7 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tena Lukas
Player
Zongyu Li
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve %
67%
(
26 of
39)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
42%
(
15 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
43
Total Points Won
32
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60% (97/66) | Win/Loss | 57% (451/335) |
| 58% (217/157) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (1027/809) |
| 54% (1813/1570) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (8963/7969) |
| 0.12 | Aces Per Game | 0.14 |
| 198 | Aces Total | 1127 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.33 |
| 342 | Total Double Faults | 2735 |
| 1:49:11 | Average Match Time | 1:7:6 |
| 466.42 | Average Opponent Rank | 526.98 |
| 64% (6376/9919) | 1st Serve % | 59% (21077/35990) |
| 60% (3838/6376) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (13092/21077) |
| 50% (1767/3542) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (6350/14914) |
| 47% (616/1319) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (2373/4806) |
| 47% (4623/9893) | Return Points Win % | 48% (17424/36659) |
| 59% (95/161) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (448/776) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/3) |
| 64% (18/28) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 46% (82/178) |
| 50% (25/50) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (144/268) |
| 81% (107/87) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (448/376) |
| 19% (107/20) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (448/72) |
| 18% (56/10) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (338/75) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
