N. Stojanovic
To Win
A. Anisimova
To Win
Nina Stojanovic vs Ons Jabeur Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L W L L W W W
Form
W W W L L L W L L LHead-To-Head: Stojanovic 1 - 0 Jabeur
They have played 3 sets in total, with Stojanovic winning 2 and Jabeur winning 1. The last match between Stojanovic and Jabeur was at the Shenzhen Open - Shenzhen, 04-01-2017, Round: Second, Surface: Hard, with Nina Stojanovic getting the victory 4-6 6-3 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Nina Stojanovic | 1 |
| Ons Jabeur | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Shenzhen Open - Shenzhen(04-01-2017)
Nina Stojanovic
Ons Jabeur
4
6
6
3
6
3
| Stojanovic | Stats | Jabeur |
|---|---|---|
| 63% (15-9) | YTD Win/Loss | 55% (12-10) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 170 | Ranking | 35 |
| 81 | Highest Rank | 2 |
| 28 | Age | 30 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 12 | Titles | 16 |
| 60% (281-186) | Career Total W/L | 64% (465-256) |
| $296,133 | Career Prize Money | $11,031,820 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
25 May 2025 / First
ODDS
Upcoming Match
26 May 2025 / First
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Gadecki VS Gauff PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Andreeva VS Bucsa PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Stojanovic VS Jabeur H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-3 6-3 |
Stats 
Nina Stojanovic
Player
Ons Jabeur
55%
(
54 of
98)
1st Serve %
44%
(
52 of
119)
2
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
9
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
48%
(
21 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
38%
(
37 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
51 of
119)
112
Total Points Won
105
|
||||
Stojanovic VS Jabeur H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 16 | Games Won | 12 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 9 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 9 |
| 2:17:47 | Average Match Time | 2:17:47 |
| 55% (54/98) | 1st Serve % | 44% (52/119) |
| 74% (40/54) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (33/52) |
| 48% (21/44) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (35/67) |
| 25% (4/16) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 20% (2/10) |
| 43% (51/119) | Return Points Win % | 38% (37/98) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Nina Stojanovic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Nina Stojanovic
Player
Varvara Lepchenko
70%
(
82 of
117)
1st Serve %
63%
(
66 of
104)
2
Aces
5
9
Double Faults
3
70%
(
57 of
82)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
40 of
66)
40%
(
14 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
39%
(
46 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
104)
115
Total Points Won
106
|
4-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Nina Stojanovic
Player
Margaux Rouvroy
56%
(
61 of
108)
1st Serve %
78%
(
98 of
125)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
50 of
98)
34%
(
16 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
39%
(
9 of
23)
Break Points Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
53%
(
57 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
66 of
125)
117
Total Points Won
116
|
3-6 7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nina Stojanovic
Player
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva
60%
(
48 of
80)
1st Serve %
62%
(
42 of
68)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
36%
(
29 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
85
Total Points Won
63
|
6-2 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alina Charaeva
Player
Nina Stojanovic
54%
(
36 of
67)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
27 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sinja Kraus
Player
Nina Stojanovic
52%
(
39 of
75)
1st Serve %
50%
(
36 of
72)
4
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
13
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
47%
(
35 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
72)
77
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nina Stojanovic
Player
Sada Nahimana
55%
(
43 of
78)
1st Serve %
56%
(
51 of
91)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
45%
(
35 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
91)
85
Total Points Won
84
|
6-2 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Simona Waltert
Player
Nina Stojanovic
65%
(
47 of
72)
1st Serve %
60%
(
42 of
70)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
47%
(
34 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nina Stojanovic
Player
Francesca Jones
62%
(
66 of
107)
1st Serve %
76%
(
96 of
127)
4
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
5
77%
(
51 of
66)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
61 of
96)
29%
(
12 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
13%
(
3 of
24)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
41%
(
44 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
52 of
127)
115
Total Points Won
119
|
2-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Ons Jabeur Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R3 |
Stats
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Ons Jabeur
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Moyuka Uchijima
Player
Ons Jabeur
65%
(
62 of
96)
1st Serve %
55%
(
50 of
91)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
3
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
35 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
37 of
91)
98
Total Points Won
89
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Ons Jabeur
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve %
75%
(
12 of
16)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
12 of
18)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
9 of
12)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
43%
(
12 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
22
Total Points Won
22
|
4-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ons Jabeur
Player
Katerina Siniakova
59%
(
37 of
63)
1st Serve %
60%
(
43 of
72)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
27%
(
17 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
72)
73
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dayana Yastremska
Player
Ons Jabeur
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve %
45%
(
22 of
49)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
6 of
27)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Peyton Stearns
Player
Ons Jabeur
62%
(
53 of
86)
1st Serve %
57%
(
47 of
82)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
31 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
82)
90
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jelena Ostapenko
Player
Ons Jabeur
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
4
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60% (281/186) | Win/Loss | 64% (465/256) |
| 58% (627/454) | Sets Win/Loss | 61% (1017/641) |
| 53% (5326/4660) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (8228/6957) |
| 62% (148/90) | Hard Win/Loss | 58% (185/136) |
| 63% (97/58) | Clay Win/Loss | 70% (151/65) |
| 49% (33/34) | Indoor Hard W/L | 64% (56/32) |
| 43% (3/4) | Grass Win/Loss | 76% (73/23) |
| 0.2 | Aces Per Game | 0.26 |
| 959 | Aces Total | 1918 |
| 0.31 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 1517 | Total Double Faults | 1508 |
| 1:13:54 | Average Match Time | 1:7:23 |
| 466.28 | Average Opponent Rank | 390.23 |
| 58% (14014/24075) | 1st Serve % | 55% (20857/37946) |
| 65% (9101/14014) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (13930/20857) |
| 45% (4570/10049) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (8078/17079) |
| 47% (1429/3021) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (2217/4652) |
| 46% (11131/24452) | Return Points Win % | 45% (17218/38233) |
| 35% (9/17) | Slam W/L | 66% (82/42) |
| 78% (7/2) | Masters W/L | 55% (72/59) |
| 20% (2/8) | Cups W/L | 67% (2/1) |
| 53% (38/34) | Main Tour W/L | 61% (133/85) |
| 63% (174/101) | Challenger W/L | 71% (146/61) |
| 68% (51/24) | Futures W/L | 78% (29/8) |
| 60% (278/462) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 65% (457/707) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (53/106) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 57% (103/181) |
| 55% (83/150) | Deciding Set Win % | 59% (136/230) |
| 86% (276/236) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (439/394) |
| 14% (276/39) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (439/45) |
| 23% (191/44) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (281/71) |
Stojanovic vs. Jabeur Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
