A. Fiorentini
To Win
TBD
To Win
Nikola Basic vs Andrea Fiorentini Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L L W L W W L L
Form
L L L L W W W L L LHead-to-head: Basic 1 - 0 Fiorentini
They have played 2 sets in total, with Basic winning 2 and Fiorentini winning 0. The last match between Basic and Fiorentini was at the M15 Antalya, 19-02-2025, First, Clay with Nikola Basic getting the victory 6-4 6-1.
M15 Antalya(19-02-2025)
6
4
6
1
57% (8-6)
YTD Win/Loss
0% (0-2)
1
Head-to-Head
0
N/A
Ranking
N/A
Highest Rank
23
Age
24
-
Plays
-
0
Titles
0
54% (76-66)
Career Total W/L
54% (97-84)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
0
Hard H2H
0
1
Clay H2H
0
0
Indoor H2H
0
0
Grass H2H
0
Upcoming Match
- / Q2 round
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Dolehide VS Liu PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
16 Mar 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Begu VS Sonobe PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
16 Mar 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Basic VS Fiorentini H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-1 |
Stats 
Nikola Basic
Player
Andrea Fiorentini
68%
(
51 of
75)
1st Serve %
48%
(
26 of
54)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
9
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
43%
(
32 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
77
Total Points Won
52
|
||||
Basic VS Fiorentini H2H Stats
Stats
1
H2H Matches
0
2
Sets Won
0
12
Games Won
5
0
Aces (Total)
0
1
Total Double Faults
9
1:35:26
Average Match Time
1:35:26
68% (51/75)
1st Serve %
48% (26/54)
57% (29/51)
1st Serve Win %
46% (12/26)
58% (14/24)
2nd Serve Win %
29% (8/28)
60% (6/10)
Break Points Won % (Total)
38% (3/8)
63% (34/54)
Return Points Win %
43% (32/75)
100% (1/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/0)
100% (1/1)
1st Set Won, Won Match
0% (0/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (1/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Nikola Basic vs Andrea Fiorentini Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Nikola Basic 1 - 0 Andrea Fiorentini
- Current form of second serve performance: In recent times, Basic has demonstrated a remarkable proficiency in their second serve, winning an impressive 51.35% of points. On the other hand, Fiorentini has achieved a slightly lower success rate with 46.56% points won. It is worth noting that there exists a significant correlation between this particular statistic and the accuracy of match predictions.
- Recent statistics on return game: Examining return game statistics, it becomes evident that Basic has showcased exceptional prowess in recent encounters. They have managed to claim victory in 55.95% of their opponents' second serve points. Comparatively, Fiorentini has notched a slightly lower record with 52.56% points won. The figures for first serve returns indicate that Basic has a success rate of 38.07% while Fiorentini lags behind with 30.88%. These metrics bear substantial relevance when determining the favored player in their head-to-head matchup.
- In-depth analysis under pressure: Under challenging circumstances, Basic has proven their mettle by successfully saving an impressive 52.55% of breakpoints in recent matches. In contrast, Fiorentini has displayed commendable resilience by saving 59.23% of such pivotal moments. This statistic holds significant value for those interested in in-game betting predictions.
- Comprehensive performance overview: Over the past year, Basic has emerged victorious in 52.94% of matches (with a win-loss record of 27/24). Conversely, Fiorentini boasts an even more impressive track record, having won 64.29% of matches (W/L 36/20). These figures provide us with a comprehensive overview when predicting the outcome of their head-to-head encounter.
- Surface proficiency: Basic's statistics reflect their superior performance on the Hardcourt surface, where they have secured victory in 61% of matches (W/L 25/16). In contrast, their performance on Indoor Hardcourt remains lackluster, as they have yet to claim a single victory in this domain (W/L 0/1). Fiorentini, on the other hand, thrives on the Clay surface, having triumphed in 56% of matches (W/L 82/64). Their weakest performance lies on Hardcourt, where they have a success rate of 45% (W/L 15/18).
- Player categorization: Over the course of the previous year, Basic has predominantly competed in the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 52.94% of their matches (W/L 27/24). In comparison, Fiorentini has primarily participated in the same tournaments, attaining an impressive win rate of 64.29% (W/L 36/20). When scrutinizing these statistics to predict the favored player, it is important to consider the relative event level at which they have competed.
- Opponent quality statistics: In the last twelve months, Basic has faced opponents with an average rank of 186, indicating a relatively challenging opposition. Conversely, Fiorentini has encountered players with an average rank of 230.8, suggesting a slightly lower standard of opponents.
- Deciding set performance comparison: For those interested in live predictions and betting, should this match progress into a deciding set, Basic has triumphed in 29% of such sets over the past year. Meanwhile, Fiorentini has recorded an impressive success rate of 64% in all matches played on the tour.
- Current head-to-head event statistics: While past performance undoubtedly holds value in predicting tennis matches, it is equally crucial to analyze current event statistics to discern the form of players. During an ongoing event, it is advisable to refer to the section below (if available) for the most relevant and up-to-date information. Additionally, some players exhibit superior performance at specific events, a factor that should be taken into consideration when determining the outcome.
- Break point conversion proficiency: In recent matches, Basic has demonstrated remarkable efficiency in converting breakpoint opportunities, capitalizing on 45.83% of the chances that arise. Fiorentini, while slightly behind, has still displayed a commendable success rate of 33.33% in breaking their opponents' serve. These statistics serve as valuable indicators for in-game live betting tips whenever a player encounters a breakpoint opportunity.
- For those intrigued by models that forecast tennis matches, consider referring to this insightful article (Warning: Intended for avid followers of statistics).
Nikola Basic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 4-6 6-3 12-10 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Alexander Weis
Player
Nikola Basic
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve %
72%
(
60 of
83)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
26%
(
5 of
19)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
42 of
83)
86
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(10) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nikola Basic
Player
Vlado Jankanj
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
53%
(
20 of
38)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nikola Basic
Player
Andrea Fiorentini
68%
(
51 of
75)
1st Serve %
48%
(
26 of
54)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
9
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
43%
(
32 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
77
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stefan Popovic
Player
Nikola Basic
83%
(
52 of
63)
1st Serve %
67%
(
46 of
69)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
36%
(
4 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
24 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nikola Basic
Player
Gabriel Matuszewski
71%
(
12 of
17)
1st Serve %
56%
(
14 of
25)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
83%
(
10 of
12)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
10 of
14)
60%
(
3 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
25
Total Points Won
17
|
6-1 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 4-6 7-5 14-12 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Etienne Donnet
Player
Nikola Basic
60%
(
58 of
97)
1st Serve %
62%
(
51 of
82)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
44%
(
17 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
42%
(
41 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
82)
90
Total Points Won
89
|
2-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nikola Basic
Player
Andreas Timini
68%
(
54 of
80)
1st Serve %
77%
(
54 of
70)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
46%
(
37 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
70)
73
Total Points Won
77
|
6-3 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nikola Basic
Player
Yanki Erel
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
68%
(
45 of
66)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Andrea Fiorentini Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Nikola Basic
Player
Andrea Fiorentini
68%
(
51 of
75)
1st Serve %
48%
(
26 of
54)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
9
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
43%
(
32 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
77
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
John Sperle
Player
Andrea Fiorentini
56%
(
24 of
43)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
9
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Andrea Fiorentini
Player
Ioannis Xilas
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
47%
(
27 of
57)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
7
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
20 of
27)
33%
(
8 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
49%
(
31 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
57)
54
Total Points Won
66
|
6-1 3-6 10-4 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrea Fiorentini
Player
Izan Almazan Valiente
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
75)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
75)
73
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gabriel Evans
Player
Andrea Fiorentini
64%
(
63 of
98)
1st Serve %
60%
(
58 of
96)
8
Aces
9
7
Double Faults
3
75%
(
47 of
63)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
35%
(
34 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
96)
101
Total Points Won
93
|
7-6(5) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dinko Dinev
Player
Andrea Fiorentini
53%
(
29 of
55)
1st Serve %
53%
(
29 of
55)
12
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mirza Basic
Player
Andrea Fiorentini
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve %
43%
(
23 of
53)
0
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
5
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Gima
Player
Andrea Fiorentini
51%
(
25 of
49)
1st Serve %
45%
(
21 of
47)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
14 of
21)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
54% (76/66)
Win/Loss
54% (97/84)
53% (173/151)
Sets Win/Loss
53% (215/192)
52% (1606/1494)
Games Win/Loss
52% (2035/1909)
61% (25/16)
Hard Win/Loss
45% (15/18)
51% (51/49)
Clay Win/Loss
56% (82/65)
0% (0/1)
Indoor Hard W/L
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Grass Win/Loss
0% (0/0)
0.05
Aces Per Game
0.05
70
Aces Total
93
0.13
Double Faults Per Game
0.21
189
Total Double Faults
408
1:6:44
Average Match Time
1st Match
242.02
Average Opponent Rank
261.15
62% (3594/5797)
1st Serve %
65% (3560/5447)
59% (2129/3594)
1st Serve Win %
59% (2104/3560)
50% (1093/2203)
2nd Serve Win %
43% (802/1887)
47% (293/624)
Break Points Won % (Total)
43% (258/596)
43% (2466/5765)
Return Points Win %
43% (2254/5298)
0% (0/0)
Slam W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Masters W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Cups W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)
Challenger W/L
0% (0/0)
54% (76/65)
Futures W/L
54% (97/84)
53% (74/140)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
53% (93/174)
100% (1/1)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
46% (11/24)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
54% (19/35)
45% (18/40)
Deciding Set Win %
50% (26/52)
86% (76/65)
1st Set Won, Won Match
88% (93/82)
14% (76/11)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
12% (93/11)
17% (66/11)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
15% (88/13)
See recent tennis photos of Basic and Fiorentini
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
