Prediction of Niels Visker vs Victor Hugo Remondy Pagotto Head-to-Head, Best Odds & Picks At Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
63% (146-87)
Career Total W/L
57% (24-18)
0% (0-1)
YTD Win/Loss
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-3 |
Stats 
Niels Visker
Player
Victor Hugo Remondy Pagotto
48%
(
21 of
44)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
70)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
70)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
||||
| stats | Niels Visker | Victor Hugo Remondy Pagotto |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 5 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 2 |
| Total Double Faults | 3 | 4 |
| Average Match Time | 1:34:0 | 1:34:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 48% (21/44) | 61% (43/70) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 86% (18/21) | 49% (21/43) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 57% (13/23) | 48% (13/27) |
| Break Points Won% (Total) | 50% (5/10) | 100% (1/1) |
| Return Points Win% | 51% (36/70) | 30% (13/44) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tiebreaks Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Niels Visker vs Victor Hugo Remondy Pagotto Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Visker 1 - 0 Pagotto
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Visker has won 51.59% of points on their second serve, while Pagotto has won 54.5%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Visker, in recent form, has won 45.49% of their opponent's second serve points, while Pagotto has won 51.22%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.02% and 30.26% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Visker has saved 69.61% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Pagotto has saved 48.98% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Visker has won 61.73% of matches played (W/L 50/ 31), with Pagotto winning 57.14% (W/L 24/ 18) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Visker has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 68% (W/L 51/ 24), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 78/ 53). Pagotto has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 16/ 9), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 47% (W/L 8/ 9).
- Player level: In the last year, Visker has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 64% of matches (W/L 48/ 27), where as Pagotto has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 60% of matches (W/L 24/ 16). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Visker winning 1 times and Pagotto being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Visker winning 2 and Pagotto winning 0. The last match between Visker and Pagotto was at the M15 Stellenbosch, 12-12-2024, Second, Hard with Niels Visker getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:34:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Visker and Pagotto have played a deciding set 0 times, with Visker winning 0 times and Pagotto 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Visker winning 0, and Pagotto 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Visker has played against opponents with an average rank of 375.3 while Pagotto has played against players with an average rank of 123.48.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Visker has won 41% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Pagotto has won 75% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Visker has converted 41.41% of breakpoint opportunities, and Pagotto has converted 53.19% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Niels Visker Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Kai Wehnelt
Player
Niels Visker
73%
(
76 of
104)
1st Serve %
59%
(
67 of
114)
8
Aces
23
2
Double Faults
5
83%
(
63 of
76)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
54 of
67)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
27 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
33 of
114)
110
Total Points Won
108
|
6-7(4) 6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yuta Kikuchi
Player
Niels Visker
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve %
53%
(
9 of
17)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
13 of
17)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
50%
(
3 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
7 of
23)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
25
Total Points Won
15
|
5-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Niels Visker
Player
Victor Hugo Remondy Pagotto
48%
(
21 of
44)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
70)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
70)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Niels Visker
Player
Leo Matthysen
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
6
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Nino Ehrenschneider
Player
Niels Visker
65%
(
53 of
81)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
5
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
8
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
34 of
41)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
31%
(
25 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
22 of
68)
78
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Niels Visker
Player
Alec Beckley
67%
(
54 of
81)
1st Serve %
60%
(
44 of
73)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
45 of
54)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
34 of
44)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
25 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
25 of
73)
81
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(6) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Niels Visker
Player
Carl Roothman
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
44%
(
18 of
41)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
9
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
55
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Niels Visker
Player
James Beaven
52%
(
40 of
77)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
72)
11
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
32 of
45)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
25 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
26 of
72)
78
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kilian Feldbausch
Player
Niels Visker
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Niels Visker
Player
Alberto Morolli
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
26 of
35)
74%
(
17 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
24 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Victor Hugo Remondy Pagotto Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Niels Visker
Player
Victor Hugo Remondy Pagotto
48%
(
21 of
44)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
70)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
70)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Victor Hugo Remondy Pagotto
Player
Gabriele Volpi
50%
(
29 of
58)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
7
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Kris Van Wyk
Player
Victor Hugo Remondy Pagotto
51%
(
35 of
68)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
70)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
70)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-3 4-6 10-8 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Jasza Szajrych
Player
Victor Hugo Remondy Pagotto
52%
(
34 of
65)
1st Serve %
68%
(
40 of
59)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Victor Hugo Remondy Pagotto
Player
Daniel Vishnick
62%
(
47 of
76)
1st Serve %
63%
(
37 of
59)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
36%
(
27 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
23 of
59)
72
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Victor Hugo Remondy Pagotto
Player
Luke Cripps
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve %
67%
(
34 of
51)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
6
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
22 of
51)
56
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Visker vs Pagotto?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Visker Vs Pagotto is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Niels Visker | Victor Hugo Remondy Pagotto |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 47% (17/19) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 1.28 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 23 | 0 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.28 | 0 |
| Total Double Faults | 5 | 0 |
| Average Match Time | 2:28:8 | 1st Match |
| Average Opponent Rank | 811 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (67/114) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 81% (54/67) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 57% (27/47) | 0% (0/0) |
| Break Points Won% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points Win% | 26% (27/104) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tiebreaks Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
