Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Niels Visker vs Mark Owen Endler Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Visker vs Endler analysis and find out who is favored!
Niels Visker vs Mark Owen Endler Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Visker has won 53.04% of points on his second serve, while Endler has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Visker, in recent form, has won 47.89% of his opponent's second serve points, while Endler has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.76% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Visker has saved 69.61% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Endler has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Visker has won 65% of matches played (W/L 52/ 28), with Endler winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Visker has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 68% (W/L 43/ 20), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 64/ 40). Endler has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 36% (W/L 4/ 7), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 14% (W/L 1/ 6).
- Player level: In the last year, Visker has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 64.94% of matches (W/L 50/ 27), where as Endler has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Visker winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Visker winning 2 and Endler winning 0. The last match between Visker and Endler was at the M25 Meerbusch, 13-04-2021, Q3, Clay with Niels Visker getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Visker and Endler have played a deciding set 0 times, with Visker winning 0 times and Endler 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Visker winning 0, and Endler 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Visker has played against opponents with an average rank of 138 while Endler has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Visker has won 59% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Endler has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Visker has converted 40.28% of breakpoint opportunities, and Endler has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Visker 1 - 0 Endler
593
Rank
593
High
22
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
21
Age
Plays
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
Form
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
64% (114-64)
Career Total W/L
28% (5-13)
71% (20-8)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Niels Visker | Mark Owen Endler |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 3 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:0:0 | 1:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (35/51) | 61% (27/44) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 71% (25/35) | 56% (15/27) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 75% (12/16) | 35% (6/17) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (4/8) | 0% (0/7) |
| Return Points W% | 52% (23/44) | 27% (14/51) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-2 |
Stats 
Niels Visker
Player
Mark Owen Endler
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
60
Total Points Won
35
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Niels Visker | Mark Owen Endler |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 71% (20/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 67% (41/20) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (318/275) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 73% (8/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 75% (6/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (6/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.76 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 220 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.25 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 73 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:29:42 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 115.57 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (1203/1904) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 76% (912/1203) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (357/700) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (62/144) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (658/1812) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 71% (20/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 70% (19/27) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 91% (10/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (4/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 91% (22/20) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 9% (22/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (6/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Niels Visker Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Liam Gavrielides
Player
Niels Visker
60%
(
65 of
108)
1st Serve %
54%
(
53 of
99)
6
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
9
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
44%
(
19 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
19 of
46)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
40%
(
43 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
47 of
99)
112
Total Points Won
95
|
4-6 6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Niels Visker
Player
Pavel Verbin
63%
(
52 of
83)
1st Serve %
75%
(
69 of
92)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
44 of
69)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
34%
(
28 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
92)
94
Total Points Won
81
|
6-2 3-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Niels Visker
Player
Jasza Szajrych
54%
(
48 of
89)
1st Serve %
56%
(
54 of
96)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
56%
(
23 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
38%
(
34 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
43 of
96)
98
Total Points Won
87
|
7-5 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
Player
Niels Visker
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
75)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
74
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Niels Visker
Player
Eero Vasa
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Niels Visker
Player
Deney Wassermann
50%
(
16 of
32)
1st Serve %
58%
(
15 of
26)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
63%
(
10 of
16)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
11 of
15)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
12 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
30
Total Points Won
28
|
6-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Niels Visker
Player
Joao Eduardo Schiessl
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
7
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
0
86%
(
30 of
35)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
15 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
21 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Niels Visker
Player
Lorenzo Carboni
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
48%
(
29 of
60)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
5
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
6-1 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniil Ostapenkov
Player
Niels Visker
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve %
75%
(
50 of
67)
9
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
19 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
24 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Niels Visker
Player
Daniel Khazime
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve %
66%
(
48 of
73)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
23%
(
14 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
73)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
view more
Mark Owen Endler Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Matej Panik
Player
Mark Owen Endler
51%
(
37 of
73)
1st Serve %
52%
(
34 of
66)
3
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
5
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
27 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-5 4-6 11-9 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 2-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-5 3-6 11-9 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Niels Visker
Player
Mark Owen Endler
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
60
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
view more
Visker Vs Endler Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
