Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Niels Visker vs Ignacio Monzon Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Visker vs Monzon analysis and find out who is favored!
Niels Visker vs Ignacio Monzon Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Visker has won 53.04% of points on his second serve, while Monzon has won 45.33%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Visker, in recent form, has won 47.89% of his opponent's second serve points, while Monzon has won 56.66%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.76% and 36.74% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Visker has saved 69.61% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Monzon has saved 55.42% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Visker has won 65% of matches played (W/L 52/ 28), with Monzon winning 52.94% (W/L 36/ 32) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Visker has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 68% (W/L 43/ 20), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 64/ 40). Monzon has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 54% (W/L 225/ 193), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 15% (W/L 2/ 11).
- Player level: In the last year, Visker has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 64.94% of matches (W/L 50/ 27), where as Monzon has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 56.41% of matches (W/L 22/ 17). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Visker winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Visker winning 2 and Monzon winning 1. The last match between Visker and Monzon was at the M15 Cairo, 24-11-2020, Q3, Clay with Niels Visker getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:22:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Visker and Monzon have played a deciding set 1 times, with Visker winning 1 times and Monzon 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Visker winning 0, and Monzon 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Visker has played against opponents with an average rank of 138 while Monzon has played against players with an average rank of 206.09.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Visker has won 59% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Monzon has won 52% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Visker has converted 40.28% of breakpoint opportunities, and Monzon has converted 49.54% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Visker 1 - 0 Monzon
593
Rank
593
High
22
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
524
Rank
476
High
26
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
Form
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
64% (114-64)
Career Total W/L
53% (227-204)
71% (20-8)
YTD W/L
50% (7-7)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Niels Visker | Ignacio Monzon |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 18 | 11 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:22:0 | 1:22:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 70% (40/57) | 74% (40/54) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 65% (26/40) | 63% (25/40) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 53% (9/17) | 36% (5/14) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (2/4) | 40% (2/5) |
| Return Points W% | 44% (24/54) | 39% (22/57) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-6 6-2 10-3 |
Stats 
Niels Visker
Player
Ignacio Monzon
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve %
74%
(
40 of
54)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
54)
59
Total Points Won
52
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Niels Visker | Ignacio Monzon |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 71% (20/8) | 50% (7/7) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 67% (41/20) | 51% (18/17) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (318/275) | 51% (163/158) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 73% (8/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 75% (6/2) | 50% (7/7) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (6/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.76 | 0.09 |
| Aces Total | 220 | 14 |
| DFs per game | 0.25 | 0.34 |
| DFs Total | 73 | 53 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:29:42 | 2:27:10 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 115.57 | 182.5 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (1203/1904) | 69% (763/1098) |
| 1st Serve W% | 76% (912/1203) | 59% (448/763) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (357/700) | 40% (135/335) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (62/144) | 55% (66/120) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (658/1812) | 46% (472/1032) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 40% (2/3) |
| Futures W/L | 71% (20/8) | 56% (5/4) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 70% (19/27) | 50% (7/14) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 91% (10/11) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (4/6) | 43% (3/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 91% (22/20) | 71% (7/5) |
| 1st set W, L | 9% (22/2) | 29% (7/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (6/0) | 29% (7/2) |
Niels Visker Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Liam Gavrielides
Player
Niels Visker
60%
(
65 of
108)
1st Serve %
54%
(
53 of
99)
6
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
9
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
44%
(
19 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
19 of
46)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
40%
(
43 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
47 of
99)
112
Total Points Won
95
|
4-6 6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Niels Visker
Player
Pavel Verbin
63%
(
52 of
83)
1st Serve %
75%
(
69 of
92)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
44 of
69)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
34%
(
28 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
92)
94
Total Points Won
81
|
6-2 3-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Niels Visker
Player
Jasza Szajrych
54%
(
48 of
89)
1st Serve %
56%
(
54 of
96)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
56%
(
23 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
38%
(
34 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
43 of
96)
98
Total Points Won
87
|
7-5 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
Player
Niels Visker
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
75)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
74
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Niels Visker
Player
Eero Vasa
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Niels Visker
Player
Deney Wassermann
50%
(
16 of
32)
1st Serve %
58%
(
15 of
26)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
63%
(
10 of
16)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
11 of
15)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
12 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
30
Total Points Won
28
|
6-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Niels Visker
Player
Joao Eduardo Schiessl
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
7
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
0
86%
(
30 of
35)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
15 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
21 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Niels Visker
Player
Lorenzo Carboni
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
48%
(
29 of
60)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
5
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
6-1 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniil Ostapenkov
Player
Niels Visker
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve %
75%
(
50 of
67)
9
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
19 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
24 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Niels Visker
Player
Daniel Khazime
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve %
66%
(
48 of
73)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
23%
(
14 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
73)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
view more
Ignacio Monzon Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Franco Roncadelli
Player
Ignacio Monzon
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
73)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
58%
(
22 of
38)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
30%
(
6 of
20)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
40 of
73)
72
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ignacio Antonio Becerra Otarola
Player
Ignacio Monzon
76%
(
62 of
82)
1st Serve %
83%
(
71 of
86)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
25%
(
5 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
86%
(
6 of
7)
48%
(
39 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
47 of
86)
90
Total Points Won
78
|
3-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ignacio Monzon
Player
Benjamin Torrealba
76%
(
51 of
67)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
29 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
36 of
56)
74
Total Points Won
49
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ignacio Monzon
Player
Manuel Mouilleron Salvo
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
65%
(
32 of
49)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
41%
(
21 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joaquin Aguilar Cardozo
Player
Ignacio Monzon
61%
(
59 of
97)
1st Serve %
75%
(
67 of
89)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
3
58%
(
34 of
59)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
40 of
67)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
4 of
22)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
45%
(
44 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
45 of
89)
98
Total Points Won
88
|
6-3 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Luciano Emanuel Ambrogi
Player
Ignacio Monzon
82%
(
45 of
55)
1st Serve %
76%
(
38 of
50)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
80%
(
8 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ignacio Monzon
Player
Juan Bautista Otegui
73%
(
74 of
102)
1st Serve %
53%
(
57 of
108)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
16
51%
(
38 of
74)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
14 of
51)
77%
(
10 of
13)
Break Points Won
73%
(
8 of
11)
51%
(
52 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
58 of
108)
108
Total Points Won
102
|
6-7(4) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ignacio Monzon
Player
Bautista Vilicich
70%
(
82 of
117)
1st Serve %
65%
(
64 of
98)
2
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
4
59%
(
48 of
82)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
46%
(
54 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
45 of
98)
108
Total Points Won
107
|
3-6 7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ignacio Monzon
Player
Fermin Tenti
63%
(
62 of
98)
1st Serve %
71%
(
88 of
124)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
56%
(
35 of
62)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
45 of
88)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
39%
(
9 of
23)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
48%
(
47 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
64 of
124)
115
Total Points Won
107
|
6-2 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Guido Ivan Justo
Player
Ignacio Monzon
73%
(
59 of
81)
1st Serve %
75%
(
78 of
104)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
47 of
78)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
35%
(
28 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
47 of
104)
100
Total Points Won
85
|
6-4 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Visker Vs Monzon Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
