Niels Desein vs Tim Van Terheijden Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Desein vs Terheijden analysis and find out who is favored!
Niels Desein vs Tim Van Terheijden Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Desein has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Terheijden has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Desein, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Terheijden has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Desein has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Terheijden has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Desein has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Terheijden winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Desein has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 61% (W/L 131/ 83), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 38% (W/L 9/ 15). Terheijden has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 91/ 82), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Desein winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Desein winning 2 and Terheijden winning 0. The last match between Desein and Terheijden was at the Scheveningen Challenger, 04-07-2011, Q2 round, Clay with Niels Desein getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Desein and Terheijden have played a deciding set 0 times, with Desein winning 0 times and Terheijden 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Desein winning 1, and Terheijden 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Desein has played against opponents with an average rank of while Terheijden has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Desein has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Terheijden has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Desein has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Terheijden has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Desein 1 - 0 Terheijden
27
Total
0
Mast
1
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
26
Minor
Ret.
Rank
154
High
36
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
34
Age
L
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
60% (515-347)
Career Total W/L
52% (113-103)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$81,829
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Desein VS Terheijden H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Niels Desein | Tim Van Terheijden |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 13 | 10 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Desein VS Terheijden H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-6(2) 6-4 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Niels Desein | Tim Van Terheijden |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Niels Desein Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Zizou Bergs
Player
Niels Desein
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
78%
(
14 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Frederico Gil
Player
Niels Desein
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Matteo Martineau
Player
Niels Desein
57%
(
47 of
83)
1st Serve %
59%
(
52 of
88)
14
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
83%
(
39 of
47)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
37 of
52)
36%
(
13 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
88)
88
Total Points Won
83
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Niels Desein
Player
Hugo Voljacques
65%
(
45 of
69)
1st Serve %
54%
(
40 of
74)
9
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
6
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
31 of
40)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
68
|
2-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Niels Desein
Player
Joshua Paris
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve %
63%
(
25 of
40)
5
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
7 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
49
Total Points Won
22
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Benjamin Lock
Player
Niels Desein
58%
(
60 of
103)
1st Serve %
67%
(
57 of
85)
10
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
5
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
38 of
57)
42%
(
18 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
41%
(
42 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
85)
99
Total Points Won
89
|
4-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Gleb Sakharov
Player
Niels Desein
53%
(
26 of
49)
1st Serve %
49%
(
35 of
71)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
78%
(
18 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
32 of
71)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Niels Desein
Player
Jonas Merckx
61%
(
50 of
82)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
77)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
8
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
32 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
30 of
77)
80
Total Points Won
79
|
6-4 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Niels Desein
Player
Pedro Gabriel Rodrigues
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Christopher Diaz-Figueroa
Player
Niels Desein
59%
(
20 of
34)
1st Serve %
71%
(
25 of
35)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
35%
(
12 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
40
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 2-1 ret. | H2H |
view more
Tim Van Terheijden Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Titouan Droguet
Player
Tim Van Terheijden
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
4
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Tim Van Terheijden
Player
Mats Hermans
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
47%
(
28 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
QF |
Javier Naser
Player
Tim Van Terheijden
70%
(
67 of
96)
1st Serve %
57%
(
69 of
122)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
16
55%
(
37 of
67)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
45 of
69)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
17 of
53)
29%
(
7 of
24)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
48%
(
46 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
60 of
122)
110
Total Points Won
108
|
4-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
R2 |
Adrian Bodmer
Player
Tim Van Terheijden
67%
(
66 of
99)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
86)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
8
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
38%
(
38 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
36 of
86)
97
Total Points Won
88
|
7-6(5) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Tim Van Terheijden
Player
Giorgio Ricca
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve %
64%
(
41 of
64)
0
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
4
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H |
view more