Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Niels Desein vs Marius Copil Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Desein vs Copil analysis and find out who is favored!
Niels Desein vs Marius Copil Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Desein has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Copil has won 49.74%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Desein, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Copil has won 47.48%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 28.11% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Desein has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Copil has saved 56.31% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Desein has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Copil winning 52.94% (W/L 27/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Desein has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 61% (W/L 131/ 83), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 38% (W/L 9/ 15). Copil has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 64% (W/L 167/ 95), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 47% (W/L 149/ 165).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Desein winning 2 times. They have played 8 sets in total, with Desein winning 4 and Copil winning 4. The last match between Desein and Copil was at the Shenzhen Challenger, 21-03-2016, Q3, Hard with Niels Desein getting the victory 1100036970.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:45:2.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Desein and Copil have played a deciding set 2 times, with Desein winning 2 times and Copil 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Desein winning 1, and Copil 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Desein has played against opponents with an average rank of while Copil has played against players with an average rank of 314.51.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Desein has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Copil has won 73% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Desein has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Copil has converted 36.54% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Desein 2 - 1 Copil
Ret.
Rank
154
High
36
Age
R
Plays
2
Total1
2
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor1
0
Grass0
360
Rank
56
High
33
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
Form
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
60% (515-347)
Career Total W/L
54% (506-426)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
47% (8-9)
$81,829
Career Prize Money
$1,305,320
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Niels Desein | Marius Copil |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 4 |
| Games Won | 43 | 44 |
| Aces (Total) | 19 | 42 |
| DFs (Total) | 12 | 8 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:45:2 | 0:45:2 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (128/225) | 64% (129/201) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 75% (96/128) | 80% (103/129) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 52% (50/97) | 38% (27/72) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 36% (4/11) | 19% (4/21) |
| Return Points W% | 35% (71/201) | 35% (79/225) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (2/3) | 33% (1/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 33% (3/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (3/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 67% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-6 7-6(5) 7-5 |
Stats 
Niels Desein
Player
Marius Copil
59%
(
71 of
121)
1st Serve %
67%
(
62 of
93)
11
Aces
19
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
49 of
71)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
51 of
62)
56%
(
28 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
44 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
27 of
93)
104
Total Points Won
110
|
||||
| 7-5 7-6(4) | |||||
| 4-6 6-3 6-4 |
Stats
Niels Desein
Player
Marius Copil
55%
(
57 of
104)
1st Serve %
62%
(
67 of
108)
8
Aces
23
11
Double Faults
6
82%
(
47 of
57)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
52 of
67)
47%
(
22 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
12 of
41)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
34%
(
35 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
44 of
108)
113
Total Points Won
99
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Niels Desein | Marius Copil |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 47% (8/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 44% (17/22) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 49% (192/200) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 57% (8/6) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.69 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 132 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.24 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 46 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:38:11 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 282.35 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 58% (649/1112) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 76% (495/649) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 51% (235/463) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 35% (33/94) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 36% (431/1202) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 53% (8/7) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 47% (8/17) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 56% (5/9) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 80% (4/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (8/8) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (8/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (9/0) |
Niels Desein Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Niels Desein
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
78%
(
14 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Frederico Gil
Player
Niels Desein
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matteo Martineau
Player
Niels Desein
57%
(
47 of
83)
1st Serve %
59%
(
52 of
88)
14
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
83%
(
39 of
47)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
37 of
52)
36%
(
13 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
88)
88
Total Points Won
83
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Niels Desein
Player
Hugo Voljacques
65%
(
45 of
69)
1st Serve %
54%
(
40 of
74)
9
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
6
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
31 of
40)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
68
|
2-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Niels Desein
Player
Joshua Paris
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve %
63%
(
25 of
40)
5
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
7 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
49
Total Points Won
22
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Benjamin Lock
Player
Niels Desein
58%
(
60 of
103)
1st Serve %
67%
(
57 of
85)
10
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
5
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
38 of
57)
42%
(
18 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
41%
(
42 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
85)
99
Total Points Won
89
|
4-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gleb Sakharov
Player
Niels Desein
53%
(
26 of
49)
1st Serve %
49%
(
35 of
71)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
78%
(
18 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
32 of
71)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Niels Desein
Player
Jonas Merckx
61%
(
50 of
82)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
77)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
8
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
32 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
30 of
77)
80
Total Points Won
79
|
6-4 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Niels Desein
Player
Pedro Gabriel Rodrigues
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christopher Diaz-Figueroa
Player
Niels Desein
59%
(
20 of
34)
1st Serve %
71%
(
25 of
35)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
35%
(
12 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
40
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Marius Copil Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Benjamin Bonzi
Player
Marius Copil
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
63)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sergi Perez Contri
Player
Marius Copil
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
22 of
30)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
36%
(
25 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
20 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Damir Dzumhur
Player
Marius Copil
74%
(
45 of
61)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
38%
(
23 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Arthur Gea
Player
Marius Copil
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
9
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
22 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Arthur Bouquier
Player
Marius Copil
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
65%
(
42 of
65)
10
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
0
87%
(
34 of
39)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
16 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
21 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lucas Poullain
Player
Marius Copil
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
19 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Henri Squire
Player
Marius Copil
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve %
48%
(
19 of
40)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
51
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marius Copil
Player
Lloyd Harris
54%
(
51 of
95)
1st Serve %
61%
(
65 of
107)
7
Aces
14
4
Double Faults
2
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
46 of
65)
68%
(
30 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
15 of
42)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
28 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
46 of
107)
113
Total Points Won
89
|
7-6(4) 6-7(7) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marius Copil
Player
Altug Celikbilek
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
54%
(
43 of
79)
8
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
27%
(
15 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
79)
78
Total Points Won
57
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Desein Vs Copil Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
