Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Nicole Nadel vs Amike Botha Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nadel vs Botha analysis and find out who is favored!
Nicole Nadel vs Amike Botha Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nadel has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Botha has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nadel, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Botha has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nadel has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Botha has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nadel has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Botha winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nadel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 54% (W/L 84/ 72), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 28% (W/L 9/ 23). Botha has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Nadel winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Nadel winning 2 and Botha winning 0. The last match between Nadel and Botha was at the W25 Johannesburg / Markspark, 12-09-2021, Q1 round, Hard with Nicole Nadel getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:46:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Nadel and Botha have played a deciding set 0 times, with Nadel winning 0 times and Botha 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Nadel winning 0, and Botha 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nadel has played against opponents with an average rank of while Botha has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nadel has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Botha has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nadel has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Botha has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Nadel 1 - 0 Botha
820
Rank
707
High
23
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
17
Age
Plays
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
Form
L
L
49% (94-97)
Career Total W/L
0% (0-2)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Nicole Nadel | Amike Botha |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 1 |
| Aces (Total) | 6 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:46:0 | 0:46:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 39% (14/36) | 21% (7/34) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 93% (13/14) | 29% (2/7) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 68% (15/22) | 37% (10/27) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 71% (5/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 65% (22/34) | 22% (8/36) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-0 |
Stats 
Nicole Nadel
Player
Amike Botha
39%
(
14 of
36)
1st Serve %
21%
(
7 of
34)
6
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
93%
(
13 of
14)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
50
Total Points Won
20
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Nicole Nadel | Amike Botha |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Nicole Nadel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Raluca Georgiana Serban
Player
Nicole Nadel
62%
(
45 of
73)
1st Serve %
48%
(
25 of
52)
-
Aces
-
8
Double Faults
4
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicole Nadel
Player
Arlinda Rushiti
34%
(
34 of
101)
1st Serve %
59%
(
62 of
105)
4
Aces
0
12
Double Faults
10
59%
(
20 of
34)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
46%
(
31 of
67)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
14 of
43)
50%
(
9 of
18)
Break Points Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
50%
(
50 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
55 of
105)
106
Total Points Won
100
|
4-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sohyun Park
Player
Nicole Nadel
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
28%
(
16 of
58)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
7
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nicole Nadel
Player
Ofer Kivity
44%
(
27 of
62)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
40%
(
14 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
44%
(
27 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Sofia Shapatava
Player
Nicole Nadel
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve %
35%
(
24 of
68)
0
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
8
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
20 of
24)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
13 of
44)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
28 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Anastasiia Gureva
Player
Nicole Nadel
64%
(
60 of
94)
1st Serve %
65%
(
55 of
85)
6
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
2
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
36 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
85)
97
Total Points Won
82
|
4-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nicole Nadel
Player
Vivian Yang
53%
(
42 of
80)
1st Serve %
61%
(
49 of
80)
8
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
39%
(
15 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
9 of
31)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
45%
(
36 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
80)
82
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nicole Nadel
Player
Zijun Jiang
57%
(
39 of
69)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
74)
2
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
4
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
33%
(
10 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
46%
(
32 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
40 of
74)
77
Total Points Won
66
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicole Nadel
Player
Nicole Teodosescu
57%
(
55 of
97)
1st Serve %
61%
(
54 of
89)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
45%
(
44 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
43 of
89)
96
Total Points Won
90
|
7-6(10) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Amike Botha Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Nicole Nadel
Player
Amike Botha
39%
(
14 of
36)
1st Serve %
21%
(
7 of
34)
6
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
93%
(
13 of
14)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
50
Total Points Won
20
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Eden Silva
Player
Amike Botha
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve %
56%
(
18 of
32)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
90%
(
19 of
21)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
7%
(
1 of
14)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
7 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
75%
(
24 of
32)
49
Total Points Won
15
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Nadel Vs Botha Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
