Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Nicole Gibbs vs Coco Vandeweghe Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gibbs vs Vandeweghe analysis and find out who is favored!
Nicole Gibbs vs Coco Vandeweghe Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gibbs has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Vandeweghe has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gibbs, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Vandeweghe has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gibbs has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Vandeweghe has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gibbs has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Vandeweghe winning 33.33% (W/L 3/ 6) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gibbs has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 219/ 147), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 43% (W/L 9/ 12). Vandeweghe has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 67% (W/L 70/ 34), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 45% (W/L 42/ 52).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Gibbs winning 0 times. They have played 7 sets in total, with Gibbs winning 1 and Vandeweghe winning 6. The last match between Gibbs and Vandeweghe was at the Oracle Challenger Series - Newport Beach, 30-01-2020, Third, Hard with Coco Vandeweghe getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:36:37.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Gibbs and Vandeweghe have played a deciding set 1 times, with Gibbs winning 0 times and Vandeweghe 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Gibbs winning 0, and Vandeweghe 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gibbs has played against opponents with an average rank of while Vandeweghe has played against players with an average rank of 342.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gibbs has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Vandeweghe has won 100% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gibbs has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Vandeweghe has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Gibbs 0 - 3 Vandeweghe
Ret.
Rank
68
High
31
Age
R
Plays
0
Total3
0
Hard3
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
722
Rank
9
High
32
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
Form
L
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
57% (281-213)
Career Total W/L
52% (308-281)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$1,145,381
Career Prize Money
$4,045,196
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Gibbs VS Vandeweghe H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Nicole Gibbs | Coco Vandeweghe |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 3 |
| Sets Won | 1 | 6 |
| Games Won | 23 | 39 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 19 |
| DFs (Total) | 8 | 17 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:36:37 | 1:36:37 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (137/220) | 52% (128/244) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 57% (78/137) | 74% (95/128) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 46% (38/83) | 45% (52/116) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 29% (6/21) | 44% (14/32) |
| Return Points W% | 40% (97/244) | 47% (104/220) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/3) | 100% (3/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (1/0) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 100% (1/1) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 100% (1/1) |
Gibbs VS Vandeweghe H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-4 |
Stats 
Coco Vandeweghe
Player
Nicole Gibbs
54%
(
55 of
101)
1st Serve %
54%
(
43 of
79)
6
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
3
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
41%
(
19 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
41%
(
41 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
34 of
79)
94
Total Points Won
86
|
||||
| 6-0 6-2 |
Stats
Coco Vandeweghe
Player
Nicole Gibbs
47%
(
21 of
45)
1st Serve %
75%
(
44 of
59)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
16 of
21)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
||||
| 2-6 6-4 6-2 |
Stats
Coco Vandeweghe
Player
Nicole Gibbs
53%
(
52 of
98)
1st Serve %
61%
(
50 of
82)
9
Aces
2
11
Double Faults
4
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
37%
(
17 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
44%
(
43 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
82)
93
Total Points Won
87
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Nicole Gibbs | Coco Vandeweghe |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Nicole Gibbs Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Shelby Rogers
Player
Nicole Gibbs
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
45%
(
32 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sara Errani
Player
Nicole Gibbs
75%
(
50 of
67)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
45%
(
30 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
74
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nicole Gibbs
Player
Fernanda Contreras Gomez
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
69%
(
37 of
54)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
25 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
68
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Coco Vandeweghe
Player
Nicole Gibbs
54%
(
55 of
101)
1st Serve %
54%
(
43 of
79)
6
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
3
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
41%
(
19 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
41%
(
41 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
34 of
79)
94
Total Points Won
86
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nicole Gibbs
Player
Hailey Baptiste
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve %
60%
(
38 of
63)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
42%
(
29 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Harriet Dart
Player
Nicole Gibbs
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
69%
(
36 of
52)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nicole Gibbs
Player
Cristina Bucsa
70%
(
70 of
100)
1st Serve %
50%
(
36 of
72)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
56%
(
39 of
70)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
44%
(
44 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
90
Total Points Won
82
|
6-0 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Shelby Rogers
Player
Nicole Gibbs
51%
(
52 of
102)
1st Serve %
60%
(
64 of
106)
8
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
41 of
52)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
45 of
64)
54%
(
27 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
34 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
106)
108
Total Points Won
100
|
6-3 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nicole Gibbs
Player
Jasmine Paolini
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nicole Gibbs
Player
Monica Niculescu
65%
(
44 of
68)
1st Serve %
76%
(
45 of
59)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
44%
(
30 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Coco Vandeweghe Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Eva Lys
Player
Coco Vandeweghe
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
37%
(
19 of
52)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
67
Total Points Won
43
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Robin Montgomery
Player
Coco Vandeweghe
53%
(
39 of
73)
1st Serve %
40%
(
25 of
63)
9
Aces
10
9
Double Faults
11
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
18 of
25)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Carol Zhao
Player
Coco Vandeweghe
78%
(
53 of
68)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
78)
11
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
4
87%
(
46 of
53)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
15 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
26 of
78)
79
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Coco Vandeweghe
Player
Barbora Palicova
57%
(
44 of
77)
1st Serve %
81%
(
50 of
62)
6
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
1
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
30 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
74
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Coco Vandeweghe
Player
Su Jeong Jang
49%
(
42 of
86)
1st Serve %
75%
(
69 of
92)
3
Aces
9
7
Double Faults
3
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
40 of
69)
50%
(
22 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
34 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
38 of
92)
90
Total Points Won
88
|
6-3 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Xinyu Wang
Player
Coco Vandeweghe
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
53%
(
30 of
57)
2
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
6
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
22 of
30)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Coco Vandeweghe
Player
Carol Zhao
55%
(
23 of
42)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
9
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
96%
(
22 of
23)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lena Papadakis
Player
Coco Vandeweghe
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve %
51%
(
22 of
43)
5
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
7
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
54
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Francesca Jones
Player
Coco Vandeweghe
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
40%
(
19 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Elvina Kalieva
Player
Coco Vandeweghe
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
35%
(
17 of
49)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
9 of
32)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
18 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
62
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Gibbs Vs Vandeweghe Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
