Nicole Fossa Huergo vs Emily Seibold Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L W L W L W L L
Form
L W W L W W L W L LHead-To-Head: Huergo 1 - 0 Seibold
They have played 2 sets in total, with Huergo winning 2 and Seibold winning 0. The last match between Huergo and Seibold was at the W50 Vacaria, 19-03-2025, Round: First, Surface: Clay, with Nicole Fossa Huergo getting the victory 6-1 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Nicole Fossa Huergo | 1 |
| Emily Seibold | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: W50 Vacaria(19-03-2025)
Nicole Fossa Huergo
Emily Seibold
6
1
6
2
| Huergo | Stats | Seibold |
|---|---|---|
| 38% (9-15) | YTD Win/Loss | 50% (9-9) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 273 | Ranking | 684 |
| 256 | Highest Rank | 442 |
| 29 | Age | 25 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 1 | Titles | 2 |
| 58% (250-181) | Career Total W/L | 53% (172-151) |
| $4,745 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Khachanov VS Ofner PREDICTION Clay
Gonet Geneva Open - Geneva atp
22 May 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Linette VS Rybakina PREDICTION Clay
Internationaux de Strasbourg - Strasbourg wta
22 May 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-2 |
Stats 
Nicole Fossa Huergo
Player
Emily Seibold
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
68%
(
30 of
44)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
56
Total Points Won
37
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 3 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:17:4 | Average Match Time | 1:17:4 |
| 63% (31/49) | 1st Serve % | 68% (30/44) |
| 74% (23/31) | 1st Serve Win % | 50% (15/30) |
| 61% (11/18) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (7/14) |
| 57% (4/7) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 50% (22/44) | Return Points Win % | 31% (15/49) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Huergo vs Seibold Match Preview :
In evaluating the upcoming tennis match, it is important to consider the respective strengths and weaknesses of players Seibold and Huergo, especially in terms of their second-serve performance. Over the past six months, Seibold has demonstrated slightly superior efficacy by winning 42.43% of points on their second serve, compared to Huergo's 37.34%. This statistic is crucial, as it often correlates strongly with match prediction accuracy.
On the return game front, Huergo gains a slight edge. He has won 54.26% of his opponents’ second serve points, while Seibold has managed to win 46.72% in similar scenarios. The first serve return percentage also favors Huergo with 37%, as opposed to Seibold’s 32.99%. These figures have a high correlation in determining which player may have an upper hand in this head-to-head match.
When placed under pressure, Huergo performs marginally better by saving 45.23% of breakpoints compared to Seibold's 43.15%. Moreover, Seibold and Huergo display nearly identical breakpoint conversion rates, converting 45.98% and 45% of their chances, respectively. These numbers offer critical insights for making in-game betting predictions.
Considering surface preferences, Seibold’s strongest career surface is Hard courts, where he wins 58% of his matches. Conversely, Huergo's performance peaks on Clay courts, winning 60%. Both players share a lower success rate of 40% and 50% on Indoor hard surfaces respectively.
Both competitors primarily engage in Challenger and ITF tournaments above $10K, with Huergo showing a notably higher success rate at 64.71% versus Seibold's 51.72% over the past year. Huergo also benefits from facing opponents with a better average rank of 392.35, compared to Seibold's 445.68, suggesting he competes against higher-caliber opponents more frequently.
In matches progressing to deciding sets, Huergo holds an advantage, clinching 54% of these scenarios, whereas Seibold succeeds only 33% of the time. This is a critical consideration for those interested in live predictions or betting when a match reaches this pivotal stage.
Ultimately, based on overall performance metrics and situational statistics, Huergo appears to have the upper hand going into this match, marking him as the favorite in this anticipated encounter.
Huergo vs Seibold Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Nicole Fossa Huergo Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Arantxa Rus
Player
Nicole Fossa Huergo
66%
(
73 of
110)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
84)
2
Aces
1
12
Double Faults
5
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
42%
(
46 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
44 of
84)
108
Total Points Won
86
|
6-3 6-7(7) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tatiana Pieri
Player
Nicole Fossa Huergo
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve %
66%
(
58 of
88)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
52%
(
16 of
31)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
44%
(
8 of
18)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
52%
(
23 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
53 of
88)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nicole Fossa Huergo
Player
Diae El Jardi
77%
(
48 of
62)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Camilla Rosatello
Player
Nicole Fossa Huergo
50%
(
22 of
44)
1st Serve %
74%
(
35 of
47)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
17 of
22)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nicole Fossa Huergo
Player
Marina Bassols Ribera
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve %
72%
(
54 of
75)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
42%
(
27 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
36 of
75)
74
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(1) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Olivia Gadecki
Player
Nicole Fossa Huergo
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
68%
(
26 of
38)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
64%
(
16 of
25)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
56
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nicole Fossa Huergo
Player
Carla Tomai
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve %
53%
(
20 of
38)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
36%
(
12 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
48
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cristina Diaz Adrover
Player
Nicole Fossa Huergo
57%
(
43 of
75)
1st Serve %
71%
(
46 of
65)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
47%
(
35 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
70
Total Points Won
70
|
0-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Emily Seibold Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Yasmine Mansouri
Player
Emily Seibold
60%
(
52 of
86)
1st Serve %
83%
(
64 of
77)
3
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
2
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
39 of
64)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
45%
(
39 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
77)
80
Total Points Won
83
|
1-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Julia Grabher
Player
Emily Seibold
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve %
75%
(
38 of
51)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Emily Seibold
Player
Sofia Milatova
65%
(
54 of
83)
1st Serve %
73%
(
68 of
93)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
42 of
68)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
46%
(
38 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
44 of
93)
89
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kathinka Von Deichmann
Player
Emily Seibold
79%
(
88 of
111)
1st Serve %
64%
(
81 of
126)
1
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
6
66%
(
58 of
88)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
48 of
81)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
38%
(
42 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
57 of
126)
126
Total Points Won
111
|
7-6(3) 6-7(8) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emily Seibold
Player
Julia Konishi Camargo Silva
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve %
68%
(
23 of
34)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
56%
(
15 of
27)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
51%
(
21 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
43
Total Points Won
32
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Emily Seibold
Player
Carolina Bohrer Martins
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
61%
(
20 of
33)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
51
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicole Fossa Huergo
Player
Emily Seibold
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
68%
(
30 of
44)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
56
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emily Seibold
Player
Antonia Vergara Rivera
74%
(
43 of
58)
1st Serve %
86%
(
42 of
49)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
86%
(
6 of
7)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (250/181) | Win/Loss | 53% (172/151) |
| 56% (549/435) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (390/327) |
| 54% (4830/4186) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (3317/2964) |
| 51% (29/28) | Hard Win/Loss | 58% (38/28) |
| 59% (205/141) | Clay Win/Loss | 54% (120/101) |
| 57% (16/12) | Indoor Hard W/L | 39% (14/22) |
| 0.09 | Aces Per Game | 0.13 |
| 389 | Aces Total | 399 |
| 0.26 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.31 |
| 1161 | Total Double Faults | 946 |
| 1:16:5 | Average Match Time | 1:16:55 |
| 443.53 | Average Opponent Rank | 458.37 |
| 68% (13412/19841) | 1st Serve % | 61% (9072/14971) |
| 61% (8173/13412) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (5430/9072) |
| 44% (2845/6429) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (2589/5899) |
| 52% (1299/2501) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (1053/2108) |
| 47% (9255/19710) | Return Points Win % | 48% (7434/15569) |
| 0% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 40% (2/3) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 54% (120/101) | Challenger W/L | 46% (70/83) |
| 63% (128/76) | Futures W/L | 60% (102/68) |
| 58% (246/424) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (169/309) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 48% (39/82) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 39% (17/44) |
| 59% (76/129) | Deciding Set Win % | 46% (36/79) |
| 88% (249/219) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (179/157) |
| 12% (249/30) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (179/22) |
| 17% (182/31) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 12% (144/17) |
Huergo vs. Seibold Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
