K. Kang
To Win
A. Tripathi
To Win
Nicolas Mejia vs Kyle Kang Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W L W W L L L
Form
W L W W L W W W W WHead-2-Head: Mejia 1 - 0 Kang
They have played 2 sets in total, with Mejia winning 2 and Kang winning 0. The last match between Mejia and Kang was at the Tiburon Challenger, 30-09-2024, Round: Q3, Surface: Hard, with Nicolas Mejia getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Nicolas Mejia | 1 |
| Kyle Kang | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Tiburon Challenger(30-09-2024)
Nicolas Mejia
Kyle Kang
6
3
6
4
| Mejia | Stats | Kang |
|---|---|---|
| 53% (21-19) | YTD Win/Loss | 79% (11-3) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 243 | Ranking | 682 |
| 190 | Highest Rank | 591 |
| 25 | Age | 20 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 6 | Titles | 1 |
| 53% (241-212) | Career Total W/L | 57% (72-54) |
| $9,935 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
10 Jul 2025 / First
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Fritz VS Alcaraz PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London atp
11 Jul 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Sinner VS Djokovic PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London atp
11 Jul 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Nicolas Mejia
Player
Kyle Kang
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve %
48%
(
23 of
48)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
56%
(
20 of
36)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
16 of
23)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
49
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 7 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:26:30 | Average Match Time | 1:26:30 |
| 60% (36/60) | 1st Serve % | 48% (23/48) |
| 56% (20/36) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (16/23) |
| 71% (17/24) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (10/25) |
| 57% (4/7) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (2/5) |
| 46% (22/48) | Return Points Win % | 38% (23/60) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Nicolas Mejia Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Andres Andrade
Player
Nicolas Mejia
53%
(
50 of
94)
1st Serve %
68%
(
70 of
103)
5
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
3
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
47 of
70)
48%
(
21 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
43%
(
40 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
45 of
103)
99
Total Points Won
98
|
1-6 7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rei Sakamoto
Player
Nicolas Mejia
60%
(
80 of
133)
1st Serve %
53%
(
52 of
99)
12
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
69%
(
55 of
80)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
35 of
52)
51%
(
27 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
38%
(
51 of
133)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
39 of
99)
121
Total Points Won
111
|
6-7(8) 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Juan Carlos Prado Angelo
Player
Nicolas Mejia
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve %
71%
(
37 of
52)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nicolas Mejia
Player
Pedro Rodrigues
59%
(
76 of
129)
1st Serve %
71%
(
87 of
122)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
67%
(
51 of
76)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
53 of
87)
43%
(
23 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
43%
(
55 of
129)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
51 of
122)
125
Total Points Won
126
|
7-6(5) 6-7(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicolas Mejia
Player
Nicolas Kicker
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
68%
(
58 of
85)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
67%
(
20 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
25 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
85)
85
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(2) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Hiroki Moriya
Player
Nicolas Mejia
53%
(
46 of
86)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
1
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
3
54%
(
25 of
46)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
50%
(
20 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
48%
(
41 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
36 of
72)
81
Total Points Won
77
|
1-6 6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nicolas Mejia
Player
Alex Martinez
58%
(
46 of
79)
1st Serve %
65%
(
47 of
72)
5
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
5
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
42%
(
33 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
71
|
6-7(1) 6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nicolas Mejia
Player
Isaiah Strode
62%
(
51 of
82)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
79)
7
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
5
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
39%
(
32 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
79)
85
Total Points Won
76
|
6-3 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Kyle Kang Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Kyle Kang
Player
Dane Sweeny
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve %
61%
(
51 of
83)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
83)
79
Total Points Won
69
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Kyle Kang
Player
Dominique Rolland
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
17 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
55
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kyle Kang
Player
Hudson Rivera
58%
(
53 of
91)
1st Serve %
57%
(
52 of
92)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
8
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
37 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
38 of
92)
92
Total Points Won
91
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kyle Kang
Player
Joao Vitor Goncalves Ceolin
71%
(
62 of
87)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
73)
4
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
5
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
39%
(
34 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
73)
85
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kyle Kang
Player
Emon Van Loben Sels
55%
(
73 of
132)
1st Serve %
63%
(
92 of
145)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
60 of
92)
53%
(
31 of
59)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
42%
(
55 of
132)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
61 of
145)
138
Total Points Won
139
|
6-7(6) 7-6(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Garrett Johns
Player
Kyle Kang
52%
(
33 of
64)
1st Serve %
69%
(
44 of
64)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
26 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
59
|
6-1 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kyle Kang
Player
Quinn Vandecasteele
67%
(
60 of
90)
1st Serve %
52%
(
53 of
102)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
42%
(
38 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
45 of
102)
97
Total Points Won
95
|
3-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kyle Kang
Player
Andrew Fenty
59%
(
43 of
73)
1st Serve %
76%
(
68 of
90)
8
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
41%
(
30 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
44 of
90)
87
Total Points Won
76
|
3-6 7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 53% (241/212) | Win/Loss | 57% (72/54) |
| 53% (557/492) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (160/131) |
| 52% (5131/4744) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (1443/1353) |
| 52% (93/87) | Hard Win/Loss | 59% (51/36) |
| 58% (138/102) | Clay Win/Loss | 62% (21/13) |
| 31% (10/22) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/5) |
| 0% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.27 | Aces Per Game | 0.21 |
| 1316 | Aces Total | 286 |
| 0.2 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 972 | Total Double Faults | 228 |
| 1:43:45 | Average Match Time | 1:40:33 |
| 440.93 | Average Opponent Rank | 438.63 |
| 62% (17848/28608) | 1st Serve % | 59% (4705/7984) |
| 67% (12010/17848) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (3129/4705) |
| 51% (5470/10761) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (1679/3279) |
| 42% (1220/2906) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (351/834) |
| 40% (11521/28647) | Return Points Win % | 41% (3288/8029) |
| 0% (0/2) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 25% (4/12) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 30% (3/7) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 48% (120/129) | Challenger W/L | 31% (4/9) |
| 65% (114/62) | Futures W/L | 60% (68/45) |
| 53% (236/448) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (69/122) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 51% (74/145) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (19/37) |
| 46% (68/148) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (21/37) |
| 84% (249/209) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (64/56) |
| 16% (249/40) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (64/8) |
| 15% (204/30) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 26% (62/16) |
Mejia vs. Kang Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
