Nicolas Mahut vs Botic Van De Zandschulp Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Mahut vs Zandschulp analysis and find out who is favored!
Nicolas Mahut vs Botic Van De Zandschulp Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mahut has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Zandschulp has won 49.8%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mahut, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Zandschulp has won 51.02%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 28.45% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Mahut has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Zandschulp has saved 60.66% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Mahut has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Zandschulp winning 46% (W/L 23/ 27) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Mahut has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 65% (W/L 115/ 62), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 37% (W/L 48/ 82). Zandschulp has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 66% (W/L 87/ 45), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 48% (W/L 10/ 11).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Mahut winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Mahut winning 2 and Zandschulp winning 1. The last match between Mahut and Zandschulp was at the ABN AMRO World Tennis Tournament - Rotterdam, 10-02-2018, Q1 round, I.hard with Nicolas Mahut getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:27:31.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Mahut and Zandschulp have played a deciding set 1 times, with Mahut winning 1 times and Zandschulp 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Mahut winning 0, and Zandschulp 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mahut has played against opponents with an average rank of while Zandschulp has played against players with an average rank of 155.86.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mahut has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Zandschulp has won 60% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Mahut has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Zandschulp has converted 38.55% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Mahut 1 - 0 Zandschulp
16
Total
0
Mast
12
Chall
0
Slam
4
Main
0
Minor
Ret.
Rank
37
High
42
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
77
Rank
22
High
28
Age
R
Plays
7
Total
0
Mast
1
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
5
Minor
Form
55% (546-450)
Career Total W/L
63% (325-190)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
36% (5-9)
$2,914,710
Career Prize Money
$2,820,045
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Mahut VS Zandschulp H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Nicolas Mahut | Botic Van De Zandschulp |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
Games Won | 16 | 11 |
Aces (Total) | 11 | 15 |
DFs (Total) | 1 | 2 |
Avg Match Time | 1:27:31 | 1:27:31 |
1st Serve % | 65% (51/79) | 70% (48/69) |
1st Serve Win% | 84% (43/51) | 73% (35/48) |
2nd Serve Win% | 50% (14/28) | 52% (11/21) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 38% (3/8) | 25% (1/4) |
Return Points W% | 33% (23/69) | 28% (22/79) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Mahut VS Zandschulp H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4-6 6-1 6-4 |
Nicolas Mahut
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
65%
(
51 of
79)
1st Serve %
70%
(
48 of
69)
11
Aces
15
1
Double Faults
2
84%
(
43 of
51)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
35 of
48)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
22 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
23 of
69)
80
Total Points Won
68
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Nicolas Mahut | Botic Van De Zandschulp |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 36% (5/9) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 35% (11/20) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 45% (147/178) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 36% (4/7) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0.52 |
Aces Total | 0 | 82 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0.24 |
DFs Total | 0 | 38 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | 1:48:19 |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 200.29 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 64% (630/990) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 70% (438/630) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 49% (175/360) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 36% (26/72) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 35% (348/1000) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 38% (3/5) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 38% (5/13) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 56% (5/9) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/2) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 80% (5/4) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 20% (5/1) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 11% (9/1) |
Nicolas Mahut Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Jason Jung
Player
Nicolas Mahut
62%
(
61 of
98)
1st Serve %
51%
(
41 of
80)
4
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
6
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
41%
(
15 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
42%
(
41 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
36 of
80)
93
Total Points Won
85
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Federico Gaio
Player
Nicolas Mahut
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve %
42%
(
14 of
33)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
78%
(
14 of
18)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
86%
(
6 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
5 of
25)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
36
Total Points Won
22
|
6-3 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Nicolas Mahut
Player
Luke Saville
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve %
44%
(
26 of
59)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
19 of
26)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
Robin |
Nicolas Mahut
Player
Dennis Novak
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
12
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
84%
(
36 of
43)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
17 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
77
Total Points Won
54
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 | 14-11 13-15 15-14 | H2H | |||
R1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
R1 | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
R1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
R1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
R1 | 1-6 6-4 10-5 | H2H |
view more
Botic Van De Zandschulp Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Ugo Humbert
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve %
65%
(
35 of
54)
3
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
2
84%
(
37 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Rinky Hijikata
73%
(
61 of
84)
1st Serve %
54%
(
36 of
67)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
28 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
21 of
67)
77
Total Points Won
74
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Denis Shapovalov
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
8
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Sebastian Korda
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve %
58%
(
18 of
31)
10
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
10 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
49
Total Points Won
20
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Adrian Mannarino
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
69)
5
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
20 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Gael Monfils
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
67%
(
54 of
81)
1st Serve %
68%
(
45 of
66)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
27 of
66)
78
Total Points Won
69
|
6-1 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jannik Sinner
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
65%
(
46 of
71)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
71)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
Rubber 5 |
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Marc-Andrea Huesler
78%
(
72 of
92)
1st Serve %
62%
(
64 of
103)
10
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
52 of
72)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
47 of
64)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
29%
(
27 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
37 of
103)
102
Total Points Won
93
|
5-7 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
Rubber 2 |
Leandro Riedi
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
70%
(
50 of
71)
1st Serve %
54%
(
35 of
65)
2
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
3
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
25 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
24 of
65)
70
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jannik Sinner
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
58%
(
51 of
88)
1st Serve %
64%
(
69 of
107)
7
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
2
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
45 of
69)
65%
(
24 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
29 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
107)
106
Total Points Won
89
|
6-4 7-5 6-3 | H2H |
view more