Nicolas Kicker vs Rocco Valente Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L L W W W L W L
Form
L W W L W L W W W LHead-To-Head: Kicker 1 - 0 Valente
They have played 2 sets in total, with Kicker winning 2 and Valente winning 0. The last match between Kicker and Valente was at the M25 Punta del Este, 18-02-2025, Q3, Clay with Nicolas Kicker getting the victory 6-2 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Nicolas Kicker | 1 |
| Rocco Valente | 0 |
M25 Punta del Este(18-02-2025)
6
2
6
1
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Birrell VS Kostyuk PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
21 Mar 2025 / Second
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Minaur VS Yunchaokete PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
22 Mar 2025 / Second
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-1 |
Stats 
Nicolas Kicker
Player
Rocco Valente
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve %
89%
(
40 of
45)
0
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
0
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
33
|
||||
Stats
1
H2H Matches
0
2
Sets Won
0
12
Games Won
3
0
Aces (Total)
0
5
Total Double Faults
0
1:27:36
Average Match Time
1:27:36
58% (26/45)
1st Serve %
89% (40/45)
85% (22/26)
1st Serve Win %
45% (18/40)
47% (9/19)
2nd Serve Win %
20% (1/5)
56% (5/9)
Break Points Won % (Total)
50% (1/2)
58% (26/45)
Return Points Win %
31% (14/45)
100% (1/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/0)
100% (1/1)
1st Set Won, Won Match
0% (0/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (1/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Nicolas Kicker vs Rocco Valente Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Nicolas Kicker 1 - 0 Rocco Valente
- In the realm of recent performances, let us examine the second serve proficiency. Over the past six months, Kicker has displayed prowess by claiming victory in 46.76% of points on their second serve, while Valente has achieved success in 45.79% of such points. This statistical insight holds a strong correlation with the accuracy of match predictions.
- An analysis of return game statistics in recent times provides valuable information. The numbers reveal that Kicker, in their recent form, has triumphed in 51.94% of their opponent's second serve points. On the other hand, Valente has exhibited similar proficiency by winning 51.51% of these points. Comparable figures emerge when considering the first serve returns, with Kicker reaching 37.25% and Valente at 38.09%. These numbers significantly influence the determination of favoritism in their head-to-head matchup.
- The resilience of players under pressure is a key factor. In terms of saving breakpoints, Kicker has demonstrated composure by preserving 55.05% of such instances in recent matches. Valente, on the other hand, has proven to be highly effective in this regard, saving 60% of breakpoints. This statistic serves as a valuable tool for those seeking in-game betting prognostications.
- An overview of their overall performance provides insight into their recent records. Over the past year, Kicker has emerged victorious in 58.62% of matches played (a win-loss ratio of 17/12). Conversely, Valente has displayed an even stronger performance, securing triumphs in 62.26% of matches played (a win-loss ratio of 33/20). These statistics offer a comprehensive assessment of their head-to-head prediction.
- Now, let us delve into their performance vis-à-vis specific playing surfaces. Kicker has flourished on Clay, boasting a remarkable 60% career win percentage (W/L record of 331/221). However, their performance falters on I.hard, where they clinch a negligible 0% career win percentage (W/L record of 0/1). Valente's best career win percentage aligns with Clay, as they conquer 57% of matches played (W/L record of 49/37). Conversely, their weakest performance occurs on I.hard, with a mere 0% career win percentage (W/L record of 0/1).
- Understanding the level at which players compete is pivotal in predicting favoritism. Over the past year, Kicker has predominantly participated in the Challengers/ITF tournaments with a prize pool exceeding $10,000. Their triumphs account for 50% of matches played (W/L record of 7/7). In contrast, Valente has primarily engaged in the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments with a prize pool of $10,000, winning 63.46% of matches played (W/L record of 33/19). When comparing statistics between players to ascertain the favorite, it is crucial to consider the event level in which they have been honing their skills.
- Examining the quality of opponents faced sheds light on the caliber of their performances. Throughout the past year, Kicker has encountered adversaries boasting an average rank of 305.07. On the other hand, Valente has confronted players with an average rank of 127.26, thus facing opponents of superior standing on average.
- Intriguingly, when contemplating live predictions and betting, the performance in deciding sets becomes a significant aspect. Kicker has diligently prevailed in 77% of deciding sets over the past year. Meanwhile, Valente has showcased remarkable strength by triumphing in 71% of all matches played on the tour. These figures unveil their prowess during high-stakes encounters.
- While analyzing past player performances serves as an invaluable tool in predicting tennis matches, it is prudent to examine current event statistics during an ongoing tournament. These statistics reflect the current form and prowess of players. You may peruse the pertinent section below for insights when one of the players has already participated in the present event. Additionally, it is worth considering that particular players often excel at specific events, which should be taken into account when predicting the ultimate outcome.
- The conversion rate of break points offers compelling insights. Considering recent form, Kicker has successfully converted 54.38% of breakpoint opportunities, whereas Valente has attained a conversion rate of 50% when attempting to break their opponent's serve. This metric is particularly illuminating for live betting tips when either player is presented with a break point opportunity.
- For those seeking intricate models that predict tennis matches, a comprehensive article offers a suitable starting point. A word of caution: this resource caters to the peculiar interests of statistics enthusiasts.
Nicolas Kicker Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Mariano Kestelboim
Player
Nicolas Kicker
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve %
63%
(
38 of
60)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
40%
(
27 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nicolas Kicker
Player
Arvid Nordquist
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
71%
(
47 of
66)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
19)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
35 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Daniel Dutra Da Silva
Player
Nicolas Kicker
61%
(
55 of
90)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
32 of
42)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
36%
(
32 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
19 of
66)
77
Total Points Won
79
|
2-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nicolas Kicker
Player
Felix Corwin
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve %
62%
(
28 of
45)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
38%
(
3 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
12 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
50
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nicolas Kicker
Player
Bruno Fernandez
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve %
66%
(
25 of
38)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
33%
(
3 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
12 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
44
Total Points Won
26
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicolas Kicker
Player
Franco Roncadelli
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve %
65%
(
28 of
43)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
80%
(
8 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
10 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
53
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matias Soto
Player
Nicolas Kicker
51%
(
19 of
37)
1st Serve %
66%
(
27 of
41)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
79%
(
15 of
19)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
11 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
54
Total Points Won
24
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gustavo Ribeiro De Almeida
Player
Nicolas Kicker
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
8
57%
(
21 of
37)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
23 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nicolas Kicker
Player
Rocco Valente
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve %
89%
(
40 of
45)
0
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
0
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 3-6 6-1 10-6 | H2H | |||
view more
Rocco Valente Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Joaquin Aguilar Cardozo
Player
Rocco Valente
65%
(
13 of
20)
1st Serve %
68%
(
15 of
22)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
85%
(
11 of
13)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
4 of
20)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
25
Total Points Won
17
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-7(4) 10-6 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Nicolas Kicker
Player
Rocco Valente
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve %
89%
(
40 of
45)
0
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
0
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-2 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Rocco Valente
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
71%
(
45 of
63)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
27 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Rocco Valente
Player
Bruno Fernandez
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
63%
(
24 of
38)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
55%
(
17 of
31)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
40%
(
18 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
50
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Matias Soto
Player
Rocco Valente
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve %
78%
(
62 of
80)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
88%
(
36 of
41)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
39 of
62)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
22 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
80)
80
Total Points Won
69
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
59% (370/260)
Win/Loss
57% (52/40)
57% (843/635)
Sets Win/Loss
53% (113/99)
53% (7270/6451)
Games Win/Loss
51% (1106/1064)
53% (33/29)
Hard Win/Loss
0% (0/0)
60% (336/225)
Clay Win/Loss
57% (52/39)
0% (0/1)
Indoor Hard W/L
0% (0/1)
17% (1/5)
Grass Win/Loss
0% (0/0)
0.1
Aces Per Game
0.01
691
Aces Total
12
0.14
Double Faults Per Game
0.09
948
Total Double Faults
101
1:11:40
Average Match Time
1st Match
510.29
Average Opponent Rank
146.32
65% (18862/29096)
1st Serve %
69% (1442/2081)
65% (12349/18862)
1st Serve Win %
57% (826/1442)
51% (5263/10234)
2nd Serve Win %
45% (285/639)
44% (1379/3155)
Break Points Won % (Total)
45% (98/220)
42% (12279/29556)
Return Points Win %
43% (841/1974)
27% (7/19)
Slam W/L
0% (0/0)
46% (6/7)
Masters W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)
Cups W/L
0% (0/0)
45% (28/34)
Main Tour W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
57% (154/115)
Challenger W/L
0% (0/2)
68% (175/84)
Futures W/L
58% (52/38)
59% (363/616)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
57% (52/92)
42% (5/12)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
53% (92/174)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
52% (13/25)
52% (106/204)
Deciding Set Win %
68% (19/28)
85% (368/311)
1st Set Won, Won Match
87% (45/39)
15% (368/56)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
13% (45/6)
22% (262/58)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
28% (47/13)
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
