Nicolai Budkov Kjaer vs Giovanni Fonio Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 29 Aug at 10:58 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
N. Budkov Kjaer vs G. Fonio

NOR
1
Win
Played
0
Win

ITA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Kjaer 1 - 0 Fonio
They have played 2 sets in total, with Nicolai Budkov Kjaer winning 2 and Giovanni Fonio winning 0. The last match between Nicolai Budkov Kjaer and Giovanni Fonio was at the Como Challenger, 29-08-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Nicolai Budkov Kjaer getting the victory 6-4 7-6(8).
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Kjaer | 1 |
| Fonio | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) Como Challenger(08-29-25)
N. B. Kjaer vs G. Fonio H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $58,345 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 65.52% (76-40) | Career Total W/L | 57.90% (348-253) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 6 | Titles | 4 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 37.50% (3-5) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
N. B. Kjaer vs G. Fonio Match Preview:
- How does second serve performance impact outcomes? Kjaer and Fonio are quite similar with Fonio slightly ahead, winning 43.96% compared to Kjaer's 43.04%, indicating a minor edge for Fonio.
- What about return game effectiveness? Kjaer excels by winning 44.96% of opponents' second serve points while Fonio wins 42.02%. Kjaer also leads in first serve returns with 30.56% versus Fonio's 28.6%, suggesting Kjaer's stronger return game.
- Under pressure, who is more reliable? Fonio shows resilience, saving 56.63% of breakpoints compared to Kjaer's 51.34%, hinting at Fonio's potential to manage critical moments better.
- In terms of overall performance over the past year, Kjaer has a slight advantage with a 64.86% match win rate against Fonio's 62.32%.
- When considering the best surface, does it favor one over the other? Kjaer performs best on indoor hard courts with a 68% win rate, whereas Fonio shines on hard courts with a 61% win rate. Grass is their weakest surface for both.
- What about tournament level and opponent quality? Kjaer has been competing in lower-ranked tournaments compared to Fonio and usually faces opponents ranked around 317, while Fonio faces tougher competition with an average opponent rank of 196.
- If the match reaches a deciding set, Kjaer has a clear advantage by winning 63% of those sets against Fonio's 48%.
- Kjaer slightly leads in break point conversion, with 36.53% compared to Fonio's 35.2%, suggesting Kjaer’s better opportunity conversion under pressure.
Editorial Prediction (August 29, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing recent performance trends, Kjaer demonstrates a slight advantage in key areas such as return games and break point conversions. These elements suggest a potential edge in critical match situations.
Fonio, while showcasing better resilience under pressure and facing stronger opponents over the year, might struggle against Kjaer's current form, especially considering the likelihood of the match extending into decisive sets.
Given these factors, Kjaer appears to have a favorable chance of winning the upcoming tennis match. Their ability to capitalize on return games and manage decisive moments gives Kjaer the upper hand in this matchup.
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer vs Giovanni Fonio Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
N. B. Kjaer vs G. Fonio H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 10 |
| 7 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:32:3 | Average Match Time | 1:32:3 |
| 72% (53/74) | 1st Serve % | 61% (49/80) |
| 85% (45/53) | 1st Serve Win % | 76% (37/49) |
| 38% (8/21) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (13/31) |
| 33% (2/6) | Break Pts Won % | 17% (1/6) |
| 38% (30/80) | Return Points Win % | 28% (21/74) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
N. B. Kjaer Recent Matches Played
G. Fonio Recent Matches Played

N. B. Kjaer vs G. Fonio Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 65.52% (76/40) | YTD Win/Loss | 57.90% (348/253) |
| 62.17% (166/101) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.34% (789/587) |
| 53.74% (1365/1175) | Games Win/Loss | 52.81% (6869/6139) |
| 63.16% (12/7) | Hard Win/Loss | 61.40% (70/44) |
| 66.07% (37/19) | Clay Win/Loss | 57.14% (260/195) |
| 68.57% (24/11) | Indoor Hard W/L | 56.67% (17/13) |
| 50.00% (3/3) | Grass Win/Loss | 50.00% (1/1) |
| 0.31 | Aces Per Game | 0.27 |
| 383 | Aces Total | 1733 |
| 0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.23 |
| 276 | Total Double Faults | 1447 |
| 1:34:40 | Average Match Time | 1:26:41 |
| 340.56 | Average Opponent Rank | 467.63 |
| 62% (4605/7425) | 1st Serve % | 63% (22400/35549) |
| 68% (3132/4605) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (15292/22400) |
| 52% (1459/2820) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (6843/13149) |
| 45% (346/766) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (1550/3634) |
| 41% (3070/7407) | Return Points Win % | 40% (14306/35653) |
| 50.00% (1/1) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 50.00% (4/4) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 40.00% (4/6) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 68.33% (41/19) | Challenger W/L | 54.55% (144/120) |
| 74.29% (26/9) | Futures W/L | 60.90% (204/131) |
| 66% (76/115) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (343/591) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 75% (3/4) |
| 69% (22/32) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (94/183) |
| 61% (22/36) | Deciding Set Win % | 47% (82/176) |
| 91% (69/63) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (348/297) |
| 9% (69/6) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (348/50) |
| 28% (47/13) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (253/51) |