Nick Chappell vs Strong Kirchheimer Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Chappell vs Kirchheimer analysis and find out who is favored!
Nick Chappell vs Strong Kirchheimer Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Chappell has won 48.64% of points on his second serve, while Kirchheimer has won 49.53%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Chappell, in recent form, has won 52.46% of his opponent's second serve points, while Kirchheimer has won 48.98%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.72% and 29.95% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Chappell has saved 56.56% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kirchheimer has saved 62.88% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Chappell has won 51.9% of matches played (W/L 41/ 38), with Kirchheimer winning 49.09% (W/L 27/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Chappell has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 216/ 147), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3). Kirchheimer has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 53/ 40), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 147/ 115).
- Player level: In the last year, Chappell has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 63.64% of matches (W/L 28/ 16), where as Kirchheimer has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 45.24% of matches (W/L 19/ 23). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Chappell winning 1 times. They have played 8 sets in total, with Chappell winning 3 and Kirchheimer winning 5. The last match between Chappell and Kirchheimer was at the Mexico City Challenger, 03-04-2022, Q1 round, Clay with Nick Chappell getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:6:44.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Chappell and Kirchheimer have played a deciding set 2 times, with Chappell winning 1 times and Kirchheimer 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Chappell winning 0, and Kirchheimer 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Chappell has played against opponents with an average rank of 255.27 while Kirchheimer has played against players with an average rank of 291.15.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Chappell has won 38% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kirchheimer has won 44% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Chappell has converted 42.46% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kirchheimer has converted 42.24% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Chappell 1 - 2 Kirchheimer
2
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
2
Minor
438
Rank
329
High
31
Age
L
Plays
1
Total2
0
Hard2
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
486
Rank
375
High
28
Age
R
Plays
1
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
1
Minor
Form
53% (300-264)
Career Total W/L
56% (272-211)
41% (9-13)
YTD W/L
38% (5-8)
$24,525
Career Prize Money
$3,990
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Chappell VS Kirchheimer H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Nick Chappell | Strong Kirchheimer |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 2 |
Sets Won | 3 | 5 |
Games Won | 36 | 44 |
Aces (Total) | 13 | 21 |
DFs (Total) | 10 | 7 |
Avg Match Time | 2:6:44 | 2:6:44 |
1st Serve % | 56% (136/245) | 64% (152/237) |
1st Serve Win% | 63% (85/136) | 69% (105/152) |
2nd Serve Win% | 61% (67/109) | 64% (54/85) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 46% (6/13) | 50% (9/18) |
Return Points W% | 33% (78/237) | 38% (93/245) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 33% (1/3) | 67% (2/3) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
1st set W, W | 50% (2/1) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 50% (2/1) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 50% (2/1) |
Chappell VS Kirchheimer H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 4-6 7-5 |
Nick Chappell
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
50%
(
56 of
113)
1st Serve %
58%
(
53 of
91)
5
Aces
6
8
Double Faults
4
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
58%
(
33 of
57)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
42 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
33 of
91)
104
Total Points Won
100
|
||||
7-5 6-3 |
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Nick Chappell
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve %
70%
(
43 of
61)
10
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
72%
(
13 of
18)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
19 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
||||
4-6 6-2 6-3 |
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Nick Chappell
65%
(
53 of
82)
1st Serve %
52%
(
37 of
71)
5
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
72%
(
21 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
32%
(
26 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
71)
83
Total Points Won
70
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Nick Chappell | Strong Kirchheimer |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 41% (9/13) | 38% (5/8) |
Sets Win/Loss | 42% (21/29) | 45% (15/18) |
Games Win/Loss | 48% (222/243) | 47% (143/162) |
Hard Win/Loss | 50% (8/8) | 50% (2/2) |
Clay Win/Loss | 25% (1/3) | 33% (1/2) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/2) | 33% (2/4) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.18 | 0.39 |
Aces Total | 40 | 57 |
DFs per game | 0.19 | 0.27 |
DFs Total | 44 | 40 |
Avg Match Time | 1:43:29 | 1:53:20 |
Avg Opp Rank | 291.23 | 525.77 |
1st Serve % | 62% (914/1483) | 62% (615/996) |
1st Serve W% | 65% (594/914) | 69% (422/615) |
2nd Serve W% | 47% (270/569) | 50% (191/381) |
BPs Won% Total | 39% (63/162) | 39% (28/72) |
Return Pts W% | 40% (611/1543) | 35% (330/941) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 25% (2/6) | 42% (5/7) |
Futures W/L | 50% (7/7) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 41% (9/22) | 38% (5/13) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/5) | 50% (2/4) |
Deciding Set W% | 50% (3/6) | 29% (2/7) |
1st set W, W | 80% (10/8) | 43% (7/3) |
1st set W, L | 20% (10/2) | 57% (7/4) |
1st set L, W | 8% (12/1) | 33% (6/2) |
Nick Chappell Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Nick Chappell
60%
(
61 of
102)
1st Serve %
69%
(
64 of
93)
0
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
0
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
42 of
64)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
36%
(
37 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
93)
102
Total Points Won
93
|
2-6 7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Nick Chappell
Player
Santiago Ruiz Velasco
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
21%
(
10 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Dominik Palan
Player
Nick Chappell
55%
(
37 of
67)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
9
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
28%
(
19 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Skander Mansouri
Player
Nick Chappell
56%
(
62 of
111)
1st Serve %
60%
(
56 of
94)
15
Aces
3
10
Double Faults
4
79%
(
49 of
62)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
42 of
56)
53%
(
26 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
32%
(
36 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
31 of
94)
106
Total Points Won
99
|
7-6(5) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Nick Chappell
Player
Jose Statham
55%
(
53 of
96)
1st Serve %
48%
(
52 of
108)
11
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
13
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
37 of
52)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
34 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
40 of
108)
102
Total Points Won
102
|
6-4 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Niki Kaliyanda Poonacha
Player
Nick Chappell
56%
(
49 of
87)
1st Serve %
60%
(
60 of
100)
9
Aces
3
9
Double Faults
6
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
40 of
60)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
33 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
42 of
100)
96
Total Points Won
91
|
7-6(4) 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Diego Barreto Sanchez
Player
Nick Chappell
44%
(
19 of
43)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
63%
(
12 of
19)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
83%
(
20 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
57
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Federico Iannaccone
Player
Nick Chappell
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
20 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
59
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jaime Faria
Player
Nick Chappell
60%
(
62 of
104)
1st Serve %
57%
(
62 of
108)
10
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
1
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
41 of
62)
45%
(
19 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
42 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
108)
109
Total Points Won
103
|
4-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Keegan Smith
Player
Nick Chappell
71%
(
60 of
84)
1st Serve %
66%
(
47 of
71)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
35 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
83
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 7-6(7) | H2H |
view more
Strong Kirchheimer Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Gabi Adrian Boitan
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
63%
(
48 of
76)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
19 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
76)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
2-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Bogdan Bobrov
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
56%
(
57 of
102)
1st Serve %
72%
(
65 of
90)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
39 of
65)
47%
(
21 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
40 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
40 of
90)
102
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Thomas Fancutt
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve %
52%
(
26 of
50)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
21 of
26)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
14 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
18 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Adan Freire Da Silva
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve %
57%
(
55 of
97)
6
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
7
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
41 of
55)
64%
(
21 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
27 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
97)
95
Total Points Won
84
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Clement Chidekh
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve %
66%
(
29 of
44)
2
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
59
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Kenny de Schepper
59%
(
69 of
117)
1st Serve %
68%
(
69 of
101)
12
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
3
74%
(
51 of
69)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
52 of
69)
60%
(
29 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
32%
(
37 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
32 of
101)
112
Total Points Won
106
|
6-7(2) 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Henri Squire
59%
(
51 of
87)
1st Serve %
54%
(
57 of
105)
9
Aces
12
4
Double Faults
5
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
41 of
57)
61%
(
22 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
32%
(
28 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
105)
101
Total Points Won
91
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
David Poljak
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
55%
(
51 of
93)
1st Serve %
56%
(
51 of
91)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
7
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
39 of
51)
62%
(
26 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
29 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
31 of
91)
95
Total Points Won
89
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Stefan Kozlov
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
59%
(
57 of
97)
1st Serve %
56%
(
63 of
112)
4
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
0
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
41 of
63)
60%
(
24 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
20%
(
3 of
15)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
35%
(
34 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
46 of
112)
109
Total Points Won
100
|
3-6 6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Zachary Svajda
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve %
54%
(
25 of
46)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H |
view more