search

Nick Broekhof vs Gabriel Decamps Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com

By Wojtek Kolan

At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Broekhof vs Decamps analysis and find out who is favored!

Our tennis head to head predictions work!
Sign up now!

Up to 78% win accuracy on past h2h matches

Nick Broekhof vs Gabriel Decamps Important H2H Prediction Stats:

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Broekhof has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Decamps has won 49.34%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Broekhof, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Decamps has won 55%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 34.95% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Broekhof has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Decamps has saved 59.8% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Broekhof has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Decamps winning 64.58% (W/L 31/ 17) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Broekhof has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 49% (W/L 21/ 22), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 46% (W/L 6/ 7). Decamps has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 83/ 41), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 8/ 12).
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Broekhof winning 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Broekhof winning 1 and Decamps winning 2. The last match between Broekhof and Decamps was at the Belgium F4 (Knokke), 15-07-2018, Q2 round, Clay with Gabriel Decamps getting the victory .
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
  • Deciding set H2H prediction: Broekhof and Decamps have played a deciding set 1 times, with Broekhof winning 0 times and Decamps 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
  • Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Broekhof winning 0, and Decamps 1.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Broekhof has played against opponents with an average rank of while Decamps has played against players with an average rank of 232.06.
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Broekhof has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Decamps has won 31% in all matches played on tour.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Broekhof has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Decamps has converted 43.7% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
bet365

Head-to-head: Broekhof 0 - 1 Decamps

Nick Broekhof

0

Total

0

Mast

0

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

0

Minor

Ret.

Rank

High

25

Age

Plays

0

Total

1

0

Hard

0

0

Clay

1

0

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

659

Rank

262

High

24

Age

R

Plays

Gabriel Decamps

2

Total

0

Mast

0

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

2

Minor

0

Total

1

0

Hard

0

0

Clay

1

0

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

W L W L L W L L W L

Form

W L W W W L W W L L

48% (27-29)

Career Total W/L

63% (158-91)

0% (0-0)

YTD W/L

71% (15-6)

$0

Career Prize Money

$0

0

YTD Titles

1

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

banner

Broekhof VS Decamps H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

stats Nick Broekhof Gabriel Decamps
All H2H Matches 0 1
Sets Won 1 2
Games Won 13 16
Aces (Total) 0 0
DFs (Total) 0 0
Avg Match Time 0:0:0 0:0:0
1st Serve % 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
1st Serve Win% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
2nd Serve Win% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
BPs Won% (Total) 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Return Points W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Best of 3 Sets W% 0% (0/1) 100% (1/1)
Best of 5 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
TBs Win% (Total) 0% (0/1) 100% (1/1)
Deciding Set Win% 0% (0/1) 100% (1/1)
1st set W, W 0% (1/0) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, L 100% (1/1) 0% (0/0)
1st set L, W 0% (0/0) 100% (1/1)

Broekhof VS Decamps H2h Matches played

Winning Player Losing Player Score
3-6 7-6(6) 6-1

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

stats Nick Broekhof Gabriel Decamps
YTD W/L 0% (0/0) 71% (15/6)
Sets Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 70% (32/14)
Games Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 57% (247/183)
Hard Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 74% (14/5)
Clay Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Indoor Hard W/L 0% (0/0) 50% (1/1)
Grass Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Aces pg 0 0.26
Aces Total 0 55
DFs per game 0 0.32
DFs Total 0 68
Avg Match Time 1st Match 1:26:48
Avg Opp Rank 0 247.62
1st Serve % 0% (0/0) 61% (708/1163)
1st Serve W% 0% (0/0) 71% (502/708)
2nd Serve W% 0% (0/0) 49% (221/455)
BPs Won% Total 0% (0/0) 43% (64/149)
Return Pts W% 0% (0/0) 43% (529/1234)
Slam W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Masters W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Cups W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Challenger W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Futures W/L 0% (0/0) 71% (15/6)
Best of 3 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 74% (14/19)
Best of 5 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 100% (1/1)
TBs Win% (Total) 0% (0/0) 67% (4/6)
Deciding Set W% 0% (0/0) 50% (2/4)
1st set W, W 0% (0/0) 100% (12/12)
1st set W, L 0% (0/0) 0% (12/0)
1st set L, W 0% (0/0) 33% (9/3)

Nick Broekhof Recent Matches Played

opponent Result Score H2H
Q2
cross
Alexander Bury
Player
Nick Broekhof
63% ( 37 of 59)
1st Serve %
63% ( 39 of 62)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
78% ( 29 of 37)
1st Serve Won
67% ( 26 of 39)
64% ( 14 of 22)
2nd Serve Won
57% ( 13 of 23)
50% ( 2 of 4)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 2)
27% ( 16 of 59)
Rtn Points Won
37% ( 23 of 62)
66
Total Points Won
55
L
6-4 6-3 H2H
Q1
cross
Nick Broekhof
Player
Iskandar Karimov
61% ( 28 of 46)
1st Serve %
71% ( 37 of 52)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
79% ( 22 of 28)
1st Serve Won
54% ( 20 of 37)
72% ( 13 of 18)
2nd Serve Won
47% ( 7 of 15)
57% ( 4 of 7)
Break Points Won
50% ( 1 of 2)
24% ( 11 of 46)
Rtn Points Won
48% ( 25 of 52)
60
Total Points Won
38
W
6-2 6-4 H2H
Q1
cross
Grigoriy Korobeynikov
Player
Nick Broekhof
66% ( 45 of 68)
1st Serve %
74% ( 52 of 70)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
5
58% ( 26 of 45)
1st Serve Won
50% ( 26 of 52)
43% ( 10 of 23)
2nd Serve Won
28% ( 5 of 18)
78% ( 7 of 9)
Break Points Won
42% ( 5 of 12)
47% ( 32 of 68)
Rtn Points Won
56% ( 39 of 70)
75
Total Points Won
63
L
6-3 7-5 H2H
QF
L
7-5 6-3 H2H
Q2
W
7-6(1) 6-4 H2H
Q1
L
4-6 6-4 6-3 H2H
Q2
L
6-1 5-7 6-2 H2H
Q1
W
6-2 6-4 H2H
Q2
L
6-3 6-0 H2H
Q1
W
6-2 6-1 H2H

Gabriel Decamps Recent Matches Played

opponent Result Score H2H
R1
cross
Demetris Azoides
Player
Gabriel Decamps
61% ( 65 of 107)
1st Serve %
54% ( 63 of 116)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
12
62% ( 40 of 65)
1st Serve Won
60% ( 38 of 63)
43% ( 18 of 42)
2nd Serve Won
34% ( 18 of 53)
44% ( 8 of 18)
Break Points Won
40% ( 6 of 15)
46% ( 49 of 107)
Rtn Points Won
52% ( 60 of 116)
118
Total Points Won
105
L
6-2 5-7 6-4 H2H
QF
cross
Martin Klizan
Player
Gabriel Decamps
53% ( 10 of 19)
1st Serve %
60% ( 9 of 15)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
70% ( 7 of 10)
1st Serve Won
33% ( 3 of 9)
78% ( 7 of 9)
2nd Serve Won
17% ( 1 of 6)
100% ( 2 of 2)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 1)
26% ( 5 of 19)
Rtn Points Won
73% ( 11 of 15)
25
Total Points Won
9
L
5-0 ret. H2H
R2
cross
Gabriel Decamps
Player
Ofek Shimanov
64% ( 47 of 73)
1st Serve %
49% ( 37 of 75)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
68% ( 32 of 47)
1st Serve Won
65% ( 24 of 37)
42% ( 11 of 26)
2nd Serve Won
29% ( 11 of 38)
54% ( 7 of 13)
Break Points Won
67% ( 4 of 6)
41% ( 30 of 73)
Rtn Points Won
53% ( 40 of 75)
83
Total Points Won
65
W
3-6 6-2 6-0 H2H
R1
cross
Gabriel Decamps
Player
Gian Matias Di Natale
46% ( 24 of 52)
1st Serve %
61% ( 38 of 62)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
4
71% ( 17 of 24)
1st Serve Won
53% ( 20 of 38)
54% ( 15 of 28)
2nd Serve Won
38% ( 9 of 24)
55% ( 6 of 11)
Break Points Won
50% ( 3 of 6)
38% ( 20 of 52)
Rtn Points Won
53% ( 33 of 62)
65
Total Points Won
49
W
6-4 6-2 H2H
SF
cross
Adria Soriano Barrera
Player
Gabriel Decamps
67% ( 42 of 63)
1st Serve %
60% ( 42 of 70)
9
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
83% ( 35 of 42)
1st Serve Won
69% ( 29 of 42)
62% ( 13 of 21)
2nd Serve Won
61% ( 17 of 28)
25% ( 1 of 4)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
24% ( 15 of 63)
Rtn Points Won
34% ( 24 of 70)
72
Total Points Won
61
L
6-3 7-6(6) H2H
QF
cross
Gabriel Decamps
Player
Alejandro Melero Kretzer
61% ( 25 of 41)
1st Serve %
66% ( 27 of 41)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
80% ( 20 of 25)
1st Serve Won
56% ( 15 of 27)
56% ( 9 of 16)
2nd Serve Won
14% ( 2 of 14)
71% ( 5 of 7)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
29% ( 12 of 41)
Rtn Points Won
59% ( 24 of 41)
53
Total Points Won
29
W
6-1 6-1 H2H
R2
cross
Gabriel Decamps
Player
Louis Dussin
60% ( 36 of 60)
1st Serve %
58% ( 37 of 64)
0
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
4
64% ( 23 of 36)
1st Serve Won
57% ( 21 of 37)
33% ( 8 of 24)
2nd Serve Won
26% ( 7 of 27)
70% ( 7 of 10)
Break Points Won
67% ( 4 of 6)
48% ( 29 of 60)
Rtn Points Won
56% ( 36 of 64)
67
Total Points Won
57
W
6-4 6-3 H2H
R1
cross
Gabriel Decamps
Player
A.j. Catanzariti
55% ( 42 of 76)
1st Serve %
65% ( 55 of 84)
7
Aces
5
9
Double Faults
3
86% ( 36 of 42)
1st Serve Won
58% ( 32 of 55)
38% ( 13 of 34)
2nd Serve Won
55% ( 16 of 29)
50% ( 5 of 10)
Break Points Won
50% ( 3 of 6)
36% ( 27 of 76)
Rtn Points Won
43% ( 36 of 84)
85
Total Points Won
75
W
3-6 6-3 6-2 H2H
QF
cross
Leopold Zima
Player
Gabriel Decamps
61% ( 63 of 104)
1st Serve %
56% ( 43 of 77)
11
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
75% ( 47 of 63)
1st Serve Won
70% ( 30 of 43)
44% ( 18 of 41)
2nd Serve Won
59% ( 20 of 34)
100% ( 2 of 2)
Break Points Won
10% ( 1 of 10)
38% ( 39 of 104)
Rtn Points Won
35% ( 27 of 77)
92
Total Points Won
89
L
7-5 6-7(7) 10-8 H2H
Q2
W
6-3 6-2 H2H

Broekhof Vs Decamps Prediction H2H Images To Share

Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions

Unlock All Predictions