Nicholas Bybel vs Zakhar Trapeznikov Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Bybel vs Trapeznikov analysis and find out who is favored!
Nicholas Bybel vs Zakhar Trapeznikov Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Bybel has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Trapeznikov has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Bybel, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Trapeznikov has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Bybel has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Trapeznikov has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Bybel has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Trapeznikov winning 55.56% (W/L 5/ 4) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Bybel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 72/ 58), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 4). Trapeznikov has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 54% (W/L 95/ 81), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 45% (W/L 9/ 11).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Bybel winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Bybel winning 2 and Trapeznikov winning 1. The last match between Bybel and Trapeznikov was at the Switzerland F5 (Schlieren), 03-09-2018, Q3, Clay with Nicholas Bybel getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:40:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Bybel and Trapeznikov have played a deciding set 1 times, with Bybel winning 1 times and Trapeznikov 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Bybel winning 0, and Trapeznikov 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Bybel has played against opponents with an average rank of while Trapeznikov has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Bybel has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Trapeznikov has won 100% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Bybel has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Trapeznikov has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Bybel 1 - 0 Trapeznikov
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
30
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
26
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
52% (127-117)
Career Total W/L
53% (104-92)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Bybel VS Trapeznikov H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Nicholas Bybel | Zakhar Trapeznikov |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
Games Won | 18 | 11 |
Aces (Total) | 2 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 5 | 7 |
Avg Match Time | 2:40:0 | 2:40:0 |
1st Serve % | 59% (65/110) | 66% (61/92) |
1st Serve Win% | 62% (40/65) | 59% (36/61) |
2nd Serve Win% | 49% (22/45) | 26% (8/31) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 88% (7/8) | 27% (3/11) |
Return Points W% | 52% (48/92) | 44% (48/110) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Bybel VS Trapeznikov H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-7(7) 6-2 6-2 |
Nicholas Bybel
Player
Zakhar Trapeznikov
59%
(
65 of
110)
1st Serve %
66%
(
61 of
92)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
7
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
36 of
61)
49%
(
22 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
8 of
31)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
44%
(
48 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
48 of
92)
110
Total Points Won
92
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Nicholas Bybel | Zakhar Trapeznikov |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Nicholas Bybel Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
R2 |
Niki Kaliyanda Poonacha
Player
Nicholas Bybel
61%
(
64 of
105)
1st Serve %
55%
(
56 of
101)
7
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
6
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
38 of
56)
46%
(
19 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
38%
(
40 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
37 of
101)
102
Total Points Won
104
|
7-6(1) 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Nicholas Bybel
Player
Arjun Mahadevan
51%
(
21 of
41)
1st Serve %
55%
(
28 of
51)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
80%
(
16 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
7 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 4-0 ret. | H2H | |||
QF |
Oliver Crawford
Player
Nicholas Bybel
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
71%
(
37 of
52)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Nicholas Bybel
Player
Piotr Kusiewicz
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
62%
(
26 of
42)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
14 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
56
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Nicholas Bybel
Player
Sergo Sikharulidze
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
37%
(
17 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
56
Total Points Won
34
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Matias Zukas
Player
Nicholas Bybel
58%
(
45 of
78)
1st Serve %
59%
(
50 of
85)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
37 of
50)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
36%
(
28 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
32 of
85)
82
Total Points Won
81
|
7-5 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Zakhar Trapeznikov Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Tibo Colson
Player
Zakhar Trapeznikov
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
50%
(
18 of
36)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
12 of
18)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
21%
(
9 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
53
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Zakhar Trapeznikov
Player
Carlo Venturini
80%
(
72 of
90)
1st Serve %
68%
(
47 of
69)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
61%
(
44 of
72)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
43%
(
39 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
82
Total Points Won
77
|
5-7 6-4 10-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Zakhar Trapeznikov
Player
Ronan Jachuck
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
34 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Renlong Pang
Player
Zakhar Trapeznikov
43%
(
23 of
54)
1st Serve %
52%
(
28 of
54)
1
Aces
0
11
Double Faults
7
48%
(
11 of
23)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
80%
(
8 of
10)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
56%
(
30 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
59
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 3-6 6-2 10-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Mirko Martinez
Player
Zakhar Trapeznikov
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve %
61%
(
40 of
66)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
2
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
14 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
37 of
66)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H |
view more