Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Nerman Fatic vs Zizou Bergs Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Fatic vs Bergs analysis and find out who is favored!
Nerman Fatic vs Zizou Bergs Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Fatic has won 47.89% of points on his second serve, while Bergs has won 51.45%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Fatic, in recent form, has won 46.83% of his opponent's second serve points, while Bergs has won 51.47%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.18% and 32.93% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Fatic has saved 58.47% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Bergs has saved 61.47% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Fatic has won 52.86% of matches played (W/L 37/ 33), with Bergs winning 65.71% (W/L 46/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Fatic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 279/ 190), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Bergs has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 72% (W/L 13/ 5), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 61% (W/L 80/ 51).
- Player level: In the last year, Fatic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 48.98% of matches (W/L 24/ 25), where as Bergs has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 74.42% of matches (W/L 32/ 11). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Fatic winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Fatic winning 0 and Bergs winning 2. The last match between Fatic and Bergs was at the St. Petersburg 1 Challenger, 28-02-2021, Q1 round, I.hard with Zizou Bergs getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:16:51.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Fatic and Bergs have played a deciding set 0 times, with Fatic winning 0 times and Bergs 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Fatic winning 0, and Bergs 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Fatic has played against opponents with an average rank of 272.47 while Bergs has played against players with an average rank of 267.79.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Fatic has won 48% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Bergs has won 61% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Fatic has converted 41.62% of breakpoint opportunities, and Bergs has converted 41.01% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Fatic 0 - 1 Bergs
211
Rank
191
High
29
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor1
0
Grass0
103
Rank
103
High
24
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
Form
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
57% (339-253)
Career Total W/L
63% (277-166)
38% (6-10)
YTD W/L
67% (20-10)
$73,995
Career Prize Money
$293,475
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Nerman Fatic | Zizou Bergs |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 6 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:16:51 | 1:16:51 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (42/66) | 73% (38/52) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 60% (25/42) | 68% (26/38) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 29% (7/24) | 50% (7/14) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (2/6) | 38% (5/13) |
| Return Points W% | 37% (19/52) | 52% (34/66) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-2 |
Stats 
Zizou Bergs
Player
Nerman Fatic
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Nerman Fatic | Zizou Bergs |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 38% (6/10) | 67% (20/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 42% (16/22) | 63% (46/27) |
| Games Win/Loss | 46% (163/193) | 53% (368/321) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (3/3) | 43% (3/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 22% (2/7) | 83% (10/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 100% (1/0) | 64% (7/4) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.43 | 0.66 |
| Aces Total | 75 | 223 |
| DFs per game | 0.2 | 0.27 |
| DFs Total | 34 | 90 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:36:29 | 1:50:11 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 336.38 | 286.6 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (632/1009) | 61% (1320/2152) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (434/632) | 74% (972/1320) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (181/377) | 51% (423/832) |
| BPs Won% Total | 35% (29/84) | 40% (85/215) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (389/1068) | 39% (847/2156) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 50% (2/2) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (1/0) | 100% (2/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 50% (1/1) | 50% (3/3) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 27% (3/8) | 75% (12/4) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 40% (6/15) | 70% (19/27) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 33% (1/3) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 78% (7/9) |
| Deciding Set W% | 40% (2/5) | 56% (5/9) |
| 1st set W, W | 63% (8/5) | 78% (23/18) |
| 1st set W, L | 38% (8/3) | 22% (23/5) |
| 1st set L, W | 13% (8/1) | 29% (7/2) |
Nerman Fatic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Nerman Fatic
57%
(
49 of
86)
1st Serve %
70%
(
58 of
83)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
29 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
28 of
83)
85
Total Points Won
84
|
3-6 7-6(6) 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alejandro Moro Canas
Player
Nerman Fatic
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Edoardo Lavagno
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
23 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zsombor Piros
Player
Nerman Fatic
73%
(
57 of
78)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
85)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
85)
89
Total Points Won
74
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Riccardo Bonadio
Player
Nerman Fatic
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve %
58%
(
29 of
50)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
55%
(
22 of
40)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
45%
(
29 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ugo Blanchet
Player
Nerman Fatic
59%
(
42 of
71)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
25 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
21 of
51)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dimitar Kuzmanov
Player
Nerman Fatic
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
70%
(
52 of
74)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
6-0 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Franco Agamenone
Player
Nerman Fatic
73%
(
66 of
91)
1st Serve %
56%
(
50 of
89)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
55%
(
36 of
66)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
39)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
43%
(
39 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
45 of
89)
97
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
69%
(
59 of
86)
1st Serve %
64%
(
63 of
99)
9
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
45 of
59)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
28 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
99)
103
Total Points Won
82
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jakub Mensik
Player
Nerman Fatic
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
9
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Zizou Bergs Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Mitchell Krueger
70%
(
58 of
83)
1st Serve %
73%
(
53 of
73)
5
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
35 of
53)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
26 of
73)
78
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Calvin Hemery
63%
(
50 of
79)
1st Serve %
65%
(
55 of
85)
9
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
0
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
27 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
36 of
85)
88
Total Points Won
76
|
3-6 6-4 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Gerald Melzer
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
68%
(
36 of
53)
8
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
10 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Clement Tabur
59%
(
69 of
117)
1st Serve %
51%
(
54 of
105)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
77%
(
53 of
69)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
46%
(
22 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
36%
(
42 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
105)
117
Total Points Won
105
|
7-6(4) 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Toby Alex Kodat
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
52%
(
25 of
48)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
20%
(
10 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
18 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Thanasi Kokkinakis
Player
Zizou Bergs
49%
(
36 of
73)
1st Serve %
57%
(
44 of
77)
9
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
77)
80
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 1-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Tennys Sandgren
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve %
43%
(
52 of
120)
8
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
8
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
25 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
53 of
120)
104
Total Points Won
92
|
6-2 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Mitchell Krueger
52%
(
40 of
77)
1st Serve %
68%
(
54 of
79)
4
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
3
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
41%
(
15 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
47%
(
36 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
79)
76
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Kaylan Bigun
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
59%
(
26 of
44)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
22 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Oliver Crawford
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
43%
(
20 of
47)
9
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
8
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Fatic Vs Bergs Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Zizou Bergs
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
