Nerman Fatic vs Paul Jubb Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Fatic vs Jubb analysis and find out who is favored!
Nerman Fatic vs Paul Jubb Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Fatic has won 47.72% of points on his second serve, while Jubb has won 53.59%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Fatic, in recent form, has won 47.23% of his opponent's second serve points, while Jubb has won 51.86%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.11% and 35.76% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Fatic has saved 60.54% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jubb has saved 61.78% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Fatic has won 54.93% of matches played (W/L 39/ 32), with Jubb winning 66.67% (W/L 36/ 18) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Fatic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 278/ 186), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Jubb has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 76% (W/L 51/ 16), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 45% (W/L 9/ 11).
- Player level: In the last year, Fatic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 54% of matches (W/L 27/ 23), where as Jubb has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 69.7% of matches (W/L 23/ 10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Fatic winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Fatic winning 2 and Jubb winning 0. The last match between Fatic and Jubb was at the M15 Antalya, 18-12-2020, Quarterfinals, Clay with Nerman Fatic getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:22:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Fatic and Jubb have played a deciding set 0 times, with Fatic winning 0 times and Jubb 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Fatic winning 1, and Jubb 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Fatic has played against opponents with an average rank of 262.93 while Jubb has played against players with an average rank of 296.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Fatic has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jubb has won 39% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Fatic has converted 41.33% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jubb has converted 43.47% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Fatic 1 - 0 Jubb
8
Total
0
Mast
2
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
6
Minor
200
Rank
191
High
29
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
417
Rank
196
High
24
Age
R
Plays
9
Total
0
Mast
1
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
8
Minor
Form
58% (338-249)
Career Total W/L
69% (183-81)
45% (5-6)
YTD W/L
62% (13-8)
$70,890
Career Prize Money
$54,540
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Nerman Fatic | Paul Jubb |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 14 | 11 |
Aces (Total) | 3 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 3 | 8 |
Avg Match Time | 2:22:0 | 2:22:0 |
1st Serve % | 73% (67/92) | 53% (51/97) |
1st Serve Win% | 55% (37/67) | 61% (31/51) |
2nd Serve Win% | 56% (14/25) | 46% (21/46) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (5/10) | 40% (4/10) |
Return Points W% | 46% (45/97) | 45% (41/92) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-6(5) 7-5 |
Nerman Fatic
Player
Paul Jubb
73%
(
67 of
92)
1st Serve %
53%
(
51 of
97)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
8
55%
(
37 of
67)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
45%
(
41 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
45 of
97)
96
Total Points Won
93
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Nerman Fatic | Paul Jubb |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 45% (5/6) | 62% (13/8) |
Sets Win/Loss | 46% (12/14) | 60% (31/21) |
Games Win/Loss | 47% (117/133) | 55% (276/228) |
Hard Win/Loss | 50% (3/3) | 67% (4/2) |
Clay Win/Loss | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/2) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 100% (1/0) | 69% (9/4) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.5 | 0.42 |
Aces Total | 61 | 104 |
DFs per game | 0.2 | 0.23 |
DFs Total | 25 | 57 |
Avg Match Time | 1:33:35 | 1:53:12 |
Avg Opp Rank | 310.73 | 278.29 |
1st Serve % | 62% (425/683) | 63% (962/1532) |
1st Serve W% | 72% (304/425) | 73% (699/962) |
2nd Serve W% | 48% (125/258) | 55% (313/570) |
BPs Won% Total | 31% (17/54) | 38% (67/177) |
Return Pts W% | 36% (260/730) | 41% (694/1704) |
Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 38% (3/5) | 62% (13/8) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 45% (5/11) | 62% (13/21) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 60% (3/5) | 40% (2/5) |
Deciding Set W% | 50% (2/4) | 50% (5/10) |
1st set W, W | 80% (5/4) | 83% (12/10) |
1st set W, L | 20% (5/1) | 17% (12/2) |
1st set L, W | 17% (6/1) | 33% (9/3) |
Nerman Fatic Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Ugo Blanchet
Player
Nerman Fatic
59%
(
42 of
71)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
25 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
21 of
51)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Dimitar Kuzmanov
Player
Nerman Fatic
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
70%
(
52 of
74)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
6-0 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Franco Agamenone
Player
Nerman Fatic
73%
(
66 of
91)
1st Serve %
56%
(
50 of
89)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
55%
(
36 of
66)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
39)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
43%
(
39 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
45 of
89)
97
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Nerman Fatic
Player
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
69%
(
59 of
86)
1st Serve %
64%
(
63 of
99)
9
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
45 of
59)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
28 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
99)
103
Total Points Won
82
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-0 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Jakub Mensik
Player
Nerman Fatic
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
9
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Nerman Fatic
Player
Goncalo Oliveira
65%
(
56 of
86)
1st Serve %
69%
(
49 of
71)
9
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
0
79%
(
44 of
56)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
40 of
49)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
15 of
22)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
26 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
23%
(
16 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(3) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
Rubber 1 | 3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q2 |
Terence Atmane
Player
Nerman Fatic
68%
(
76 of
111)
1st Serve %
63%
(
49 of
78)
11
Aces
12
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
56 of
76)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
38 of
49)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
33%
(
37 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
27%
(
21 of
78)
95
Total Points Won
94
|
6-3 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Nerman Fatic
Player
Illya Marchenko
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
85)
9
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
15 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
33 of
85)
79
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
QF |
Denis Yevseyev
Player
Nerman Fatic
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
51%
(
30 of
59)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Paul Jubb Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Juan Pablo Varillas
Player
Paul Jubb
64%
(
62 of
97)
1st Serve %
67%
(
69 of
103)
5
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
45 of
69)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
35 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
39 of
103)
101
Total Points Won
99
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Valerio Aboian
Player
Paul Jubb
63%
(
59 of
94)
1st Serve %
59%
(
51 of
87)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
40%
(
38 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
87)
94
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
F |
Clement Chidekh
Player
Paul Jubb
62%
(
52 of
84)
1st Serve %
60%
(
49 of
81)
1
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
1
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
45%
(
38 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
81)
81
Total Points Won
84
|
0-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
SF |
Paul Jubb
Player
Elmar Ejupovic
73%
(
58 of
80)
1st Serve %
66%
(
80 of
121)
10
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
4
86%
(
50 of
58)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
58 of
80)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
20%
(
16 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
47 of
121)
111
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Paul Jubb
Player
Henry Searle
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve %
64%
(
61 of
95)
5
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
2
82%
(
41 of
50)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
43 of
61)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
26%
(
18 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
40 of
95)
92
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Paul Jubb
Player
Charlie Robertson
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Paul Jubb
Player
Francesco Maestrelli
63%
(
57 of
91)
1st Serve %
57%
(
65 of
114)
6
Aces
11
4
Double Faults
5
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
48 of
65)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
19 of
49)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
30 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
47 of
114)
108
Total Points Won
97
|
6-4 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Paul Jubb
Player
David Poljak
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
46%
(
30 of
65)
6
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
2
85%
(
34 of
40)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
25 of
30)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
13 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
24 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Paul Jubb
Player
George Houghton
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
46%
(
33 of
72)
11
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
5
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
25 of
33)
84%
(
16 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
9 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
72)
72
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Hamish Stewart
Player
Paul Jubb
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve %
65%
(
47 of
72)
6
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
27 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H |
view more