Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Nerman Fatic vs Mate Valkusz Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Fatic vs Valkusz analysis and find out who is favored!
Nerman Fatic vs Mate Valkusz Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Fatic has won 47.95% of points on his second serve, while Valkusz has won 48.4%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Fatic, in recent form, has won 46.69% of his opponent's second serve points, while Valkusz has won 49.58%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.05% and 28.72% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Fatic has saved 58.1% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Valkusz has saved 59.79% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Fatic has won 53.62% of matches played (W/L 37/ 32), with Valkusz winning 57.45% (W/L 27/ 20) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Fatic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 279/ 190), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Valkusz has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 71% (W/L 164/ 66), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Fatic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 24/ 24), where as Valkusz has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 61.11% of matches (W/L 22/ 14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Fatic winning 0 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Fatic winning 0 and Valkusz winning 4. The last match between Fatic and Valkusz was at the Split Challenger, 19-04-2022, First, Clay with Mate Valkusz getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:17:49.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Fatic and Valkusz have played a deciding set 0 times, with Fatic winning 0 times and Valkusz 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Fatic winning 0, and Valkusz 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Fatic has played against opponents with an average rank of 276.42 while Valkusz has played against players with an average rank of 298.96.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Fatic has won 48% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Valkusz has won 47% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Fatic has converted 41.34% of breakpoint opportunities, and Valkusz has converted 41.46% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Fatic 0 - 2 Valkusz
211
Rank
191
High
29
Age
R
Plays
0
Total2
0
Hard0
0
Clay2
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
227
Rank
204
High
25
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
Form
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
57% (339-253)
Career Total W/L
67% (205-102)
38% (6-10)
YTD W/L
38% (3-5)
$73,995
Career Prize Money
$132,900
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Nerman Fatic | Mate Valkusz |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 2 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 4 |
| Games Won | 8 | 24 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 10 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:17:49 | 1:17:49 |
| 1st Serve % | 75% (85/114) | 73% (72/98) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 56% (48/85) | 71% (51/72) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 17% (5/29) | 65% (17/26) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 25% (1/4) | 36% (9/25) |
| Return Points W% | 31% (30/98) | 54% (61/114) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/2) | 100% (2/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-0 6-3 |
Stats 
Mate Valkusz
Player
Nerman Fatic
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve %
76%
(
31 of
41)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
60
Total Points Won
33
|
||||
| 6-4 6-1 |
Stats
Mate Valkusz
Player
Nerman Fatic
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
74%
(
54 of
73)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
7
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
16%
(
3 of
19)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
38 of
73)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Nerman Fatic | Mate Valkusz |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 38% (6/10) | 38% (3/5) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 42% (16/22) | 43% (9/12) |
| Games Win/Loss | 46% (163/193) | 46% (91/105) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (3/3) | 60% (3/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 22% (2/7) | 0% (0/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.43 | 0.34 |
| Aces Total | 75 | 33 |
| DFs per game | 0.2 | 0.42 |
| DFs Total | 34 | 40 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:36:29 | 1:47:41 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 336.38 | 234.75 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (632/1009) | 65% (414/635) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (434/632) | 68% (281/414) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (181/377) | 42% (92/221) |
| BPs Won% Total | 35% (29/84) | 39% (24/62) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (389/1068) | 39% (247/634) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 75% (3/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Main Tour W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 27% (3/8) | 0% (0/2) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 40% (6/15) | 43% (3/7) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 40% (2/5) | 33% (1/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 63% (8/5) | 50% (4/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 38% (8/3) | 50% (4/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 13% (8/1) | 25% (4/1) |
Nerman Fatic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Nerman Fatic
57%
(
49 of
86)
1st Serve %
70%
(
58 of
83)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
29 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
28 of
83)
85
Total Points Won
84
|
3-6 7-6(6) 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alejandro Moro Canas
Player
Nerman Fatic
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Edoardo Lavagno
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
23 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zsombor Piros
Player
Nerman Fatic
73%
(
57 of
78)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
85)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
85)
89
Total Points Won
74
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Riccardo Bonadio
Player
Nerman Fatic
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve %
58%
(
29 of
50)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
55%
(
22 of
40)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
45%
(
29 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ugo Blanchet
Player
Nerman Fatic
59%
(
42 of
71)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
25 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
21 of
51)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dimitar Kuzmanov
Player
Nerman Fatic
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
70%
(
52 of
74)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
6-0 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Franco Agamenone
Player
Nerman Fatic
73%
(
66 of
91)
1st Serve %
56%
(
50 of
89)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
55%
(
36 of
66)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
39)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
43%
(
39 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
45 of
89)
97
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
69%
(
59 of
86)
1st Serve %
64%
(
63 of
99)
9
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
45 of
59)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
28 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
99)
103
Total Points Won
82
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jakub Mensik
Player
Nerman Fatic
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
9
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Mate Valkusz Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Jaime Faria
Player
Mate Valkusz
51%
(
37 of
72)
1st Serve %
60%
(
46 of
77)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
7
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
77)
79
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Martineau
Player
Mate Valkusz
63%
(
51 of
81)
1st Serve %
64%
(
60 of
94)
6
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
7
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
10 of
34)
35%
(
7 of
20)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
33 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
50 of
94)
98
Total Points Won
77
|
4-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 4 |
Stats
Jan-Lennard Struff
Player
Mate Valkusz
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
10
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Max Purcell
Player
Mate Valkusz
60%
(
81 of
136)
1st Serve %
66%
(
89 of
135)
17
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
11
75%
(
61 of
81)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
66 of
89)
55%
(
30 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
33%
(
45 of
136)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
48 of
135)
139
Total Points Won
132
|
3-6 7-6(2) 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mate Valkusz
Player
Andrea Vavassori
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Mate Valkusz
Player
Francisco Comesana
74%
(
51 of
69)
1st Serve %
67%
(
52 of
78)
2
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
28%
(
5 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
39%
(
27 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
78)
78
Total Points Won
69
|
2-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mate Valkusz
Player
Tung-Lin Wu
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve %
59%
(
53 of
90)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
41 of
90)
86
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(0) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yu Hsiou Hsu
Player
Mate Valkusz
59%
(
44 of
75)
1st Serve %
67%
(
56 of
84)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
26 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
84)
86
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alexander Shevchenko
Player
Mate Valkusz
67%
(
48 of
72)
1st Serve %
62%
(
52 of
84)
10
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
85%
(
41 of
48)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
36 of
52)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
26%
(
19 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
84)
87
Total Points Won
69
|
7-5 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mate Valkusz
Player
Daniel Altmaier
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve %
65%
(
39 of
60)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
13 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Fatic Vs Valkusz Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
