Nerman Fatic vs Mark Vervoort Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Fatic vs Vervoort analysis and find out who is favored!
Nerman Fatic vs Mark Vervoort Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Fatic has won 48.09% of points on his second serve, while Vervoort has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Fatic, in recent form, has won 46.64% of his opponent's second serve points, while Vervoort has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.71% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Fatic has saved 56.99% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Vervoort has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Fatic has won 53.62% of matches played (W/L 37/ 32), with Vervoort winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Fatic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 279/ 189), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Vervoort has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 35% (W/L 68/ 125), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Fatic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 24/ 24), where as Vervoort has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Fatic winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Fatic winning 2 and Vervoort winning 0. The last match between Fatic and Vervoort was at the Perugia Challenger, 04-07-2021, Q1 round, Clay with Nerman Fatic getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:3:6.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Fatic and Vervoort have played a deciding set 0 times, with Fatic winning 0 times and Vervoort 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Fatic winning 0, and Vervoort 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Fatic has played against opponents with an average rank of 273.17 while Vervoort has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Fatic has won 48% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Vervoort has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Fatic has converted 40.51% of breakpoint opportunities, and Vervoort has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Fatic 1 - 0 Vervoort
8
Total
0
Mast
2
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
6
Minor
212
Rank
191
High
29
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
817
High
33
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
57% (339-252)
Career Total W/L
35% (86-160)
40% (6-9)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$73,995
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Nerman Fatic | Mark Vervoort |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 2 |
Aces (Total) | 6 | 1 |
DFs (Total) | 2 | 4 |
Avg Match Time | 1:3:6 | 1:3:6 |
1st Serve % | 39% (14/36) | 55% (31/56) |
1st Serve Win% | 93% (13/14) | 52% (16/31) |
2nd Serve Win% | 68% (15/22) | 36% (9/25) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 56% (5/9) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 55% (31/56) | 22% (8/36) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-1 6-1 |
Nerman Fatic
Player
Mark Vervoort
39%
(
14 of
36)
1st Serve %
55%
(
31 of
56)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
93%
(
13 of
14)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
59
Total Points Won
33
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Nerman Fatic | Mark Vervoort |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 40% (6/9) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 43% (15/20) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 46% (150/179) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 25% (2/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.43 | 0 |
Aces Total | 70 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.2 | 0 |
DFs Total | 33 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:33:7 | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 343.87 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 62% (574/926) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 68% (393/574) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 47% (167/352) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 33% (27/81) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 37% (360/982) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 30% (3/7) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 40% (6/15) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 60% (3/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 40% (2/5) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 71% (7/5) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 29% (7/2) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 13% (8/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Nerman Fatic Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Alejandro Moro Canas
Player
Nerman Fatic
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Nerman Fatic
Player
Edoardo Lavagno
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
23 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Zsombor Piros
Player
Nerman Fatic
73%
(
57 of
78)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
85)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
85)
89
Total Points Won
74
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Riccardo Bonadio
Player
Nerman Fatic
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve %
58%
(
29 of
50)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
55%
(
22 of
40)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
45%
(
29 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ugo Blanchet
Player
Nerman Fatic
59%
(
42 of
71)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
25 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
21 of
51)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Dimitar Kuzmanov
Player
Nerman Fatic
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
70%
(
52 of
74)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
6-0 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Franco Agamenone
Player
Nerman Fatic
73%
(
66 of
91)
1st Serve %
56%
(
50 of
89)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
55%
(
36 of
66)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
39)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
43%
(
39 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
45 of
89)
97
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Nerman Fatic
Player
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
69%
(
59 of
86)
1st Serve %
64%
(
63 of
99)
9
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
45 of
59)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
28 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
99)
103
Total Points Won
82
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-0 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Jakub Mensik
Player
Nerman Fatic
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
9
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Nerman Fatic
Player
Goncalo Oliveira
65%
(
56 of
86)
1st Serve %
69%
(
49 of
71)
9
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
0
79%
(
44 of
56)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
40 of
49)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
15 of
22)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
26 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
23%
(
16 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(3) 7-6(5) | H2H |
view more
Mark Vervoort Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Michael Geerts
Player
Mark Vervoort
62%
(
18 of
29)
1st Serve %
60%
(
25 of
42)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
83%
(
15 of
18)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
91%
(
10 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
4 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
51
Total Points Won
20
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Riccardo Balzerani
Player
Mark Vervoort
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
15 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
39 of
68)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Nerman Fatic
Player
Mark Vervoort
39%
(
14 of
36)
1st Serve %
55%
(
31 of
56)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
93%
(
13 of
14)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
59
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
QF |
Sem Verbeek
Player
Mark Vervoort
51%
(
26 of
51)
1st Serve %
57%
(
33 of
58)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
76%
(
19 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jonathan Eysseric
Player
Mark Vervoort
58%
(
23 of
40)
1st Serve %
55%
(
23 of
42)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
70%
(
16 of
23)
1st Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
14 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
54
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Mark Vervoort
Player
Youlian Iakovlev
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
25 of
34)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Riccardo Bellotti
Player
Mark Vervoort
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve %
68%
(
27 of
40)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
88%
(
14 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
6 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
57
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Jelle Sels
Player
Mark Vervoort
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 7-5 6-4 | H2H |
view more