Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Nerman Fatic vs Marco Cecchinato Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Fatic vs Cecchinato analysis and find out who is favored!
Nerman Fatic vs Marco Cecchinato Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Fatic has won 47.71% of points on his second serve, while Cecchinato has won 45.26%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Fatic, in recent form, has won 47.19% of his opponent's second serve points, while Cecchinato has won 51.56%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.27% and 32.24% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Fatic has saved 57.79% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Cecchinato has saved 55.83% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Fatic has won 53.62% of matches played (W/L 37/ 32), with Cecchinato winning 34.21% (W/L 13/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Fatic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 279/ 189), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Cecchinato has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 437/ 269), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 18% (W/L 2/ 9).
- Player level: In the last year, Fatic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 24/ 24), where as Cecchinato has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 31.25% of matches (W/L 5/ 11). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Fatic winning 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Fatic winning 2 and Cecchinato winning 3. The last match between Fatic and Cecchinato was at the Como Challenger, 30-08-2022, First, Clay with Nerman Fatic getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:19:46.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Fatic and Cecchinato have played a deciding set 1 times, with Fatic winning 1 times and Cecchinato 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 3 tiebreaks against each other with Fatic winning 1, and Cecchinato 2.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Fatic has played against opponents with an average rank of 273.91 while Cecchinato has played against players with an average rank of 263.24.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Fatic has won 48% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Cecchinato has won 80% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Fatic has converted 40.47% of breakpoint opportunities, and Cecchinato has converted 47.56% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Fatic 1 - 1 Cecchinato
212
Rank
191
High
29
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard0
1
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
288
Rank
16
High
31
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
Form
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
57% (339-252)
Career Total W/L
57% (479-363)
40% (6-9)
YTD W/L
38% (6-10)
$73,995
Career Prize Money
$2,233,276
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Fatic VS Cecchinato H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Nerman Fatic | Marco Cecchinato |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 3 |
| Games Won | 28 | 27 |
| Aces (Total) | 6 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:19:46 | 2:19:46 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (110/191) | 63% (112/177) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 65% (71/110) | 61% (68/112) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 47% (38/81) | 48% (31/65) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 48% (11/23) | 35% (9/26) |
| Return Points W% | 44% (78/177) | 43% (82/191) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (1/3) | 67% (2/3) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Fatic VS Cecchinato H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-7(2) 7-6(2) 6-1 |
Stats 
Nerman Fatic
Player
Marco Cecchinato
53%
(
60 of
113)
1st Serve %
58%
(
60 of
104)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
42 of
60)
51%
(
27 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
17 of
44)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
39%
(
44 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
45 of
104)
114
Total Points Won
103
|
||||
| 6-3 7-6(4) |
Stats
Marco Cecchinato
Player
Nerman Fatic
71%
(
52 of
73)
1st Serve %
64%
(
50 of
78)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
50%
(
26 of
52)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
45%
(
33 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
78)
78
Total Points Won
73
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Nerman Fatic | Marco Cecchinato |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 40% (6/9) | 38% (6/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 43% (15/20) | 36% (12/21) |
| Games Win/Loss | 46% (150/179) | 46% (138/160) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 25% (2/6) | 43% (6/8) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.43 | 0.21 |
| Aces Total | 70 | 30 |
| DFs per game | 0.2 | 0.38 |
| DFs Total | 33 | 54 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:33:7 | 1:31:40 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 347.27 | 313.19 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (574/926) | 62% (628/1008) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (393/574) | 64% (403/628) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (167/352) | 45% (172/380) |
| BPs Won% Total | 33% (27/81) | 48% (39/82) |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (360/982) | 40% (369/933) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 50% (1/1) | 33% (1/2) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 30% (3/7) | 42% (5/7) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 40% (6/15) | 38% (6/16) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 60% (3/5) | 33% (1/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 40% (2/5) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 71% (7/5) | 100% (5/5) |
| 1st set W, L | 29% (7/2) | 0% (5/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 13% (8/1) | 9% (11/1) |
Nerman Fatic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Alejandro Moro Canas
Player
Nerman Fatic
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Edoardo Lavagno
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
23 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zsombor Piros
Player
Nerman Fatic
73%
(
57 of
78)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
85)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
85)
89
Total Points Won
74
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Riccardo Bonadio
Player
Nerman Fatic
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve %
58%
(
29 of
50)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
55%
(
22 of
40)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
45%
(
29 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ugo Blanchet
Player
Nerman Fatic
59%
(
42 of
71)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
25 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
21 of
51)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dimitar Kuzmanov
Player
Nerman Fatic
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
70%
(
52 of
74)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
6-0 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Franco Agamenone
Player
Nerman Fatic
73%
(
66 of
91)
1st Serve %
56%
(
50 of
89)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
55%
(
36 of
66)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
39)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
43%
(
39 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
45 of
89)
97
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
69%
(
59 of
86)
1st Serve %
64%
(
63 of
99)
9
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
45 of
59)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
28 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
99)
103
Total Points Won
82
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jakub Mensik
Player
Nerman Fatic
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
9
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Goncalo Oliveira
65%
(
56 of
86)
1st Serve %
69%
(
49 of
71)
9
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
0
79%
(
44 of
56)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
40 of
49)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
15 of
22)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
26 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
23%
(
16 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(3) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Marco Cecchinato Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Marco Cecchinato
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve %
56%
(
20 of
36)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
6%
(
1 of
16)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
9 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
46
Total Points Won
21
|
6-1 4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marco Cecchinato
Player
Miguel Damas
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
48%
(
22 of
46)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
44%
(
23 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Francesco Maestrelli
Player
Marco Cecchinato
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve %
66%
(
48 of
73)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
33%
(
22 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
73)
74
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Radu Albot
Player
Marco Cecchinato
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
71)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
32 of
71)
69
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pedro Sakamoto
Player
Marco Cecchinato
69%
(
50 of
72)
1st Serve %
63%
(
51 of
81)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
36%
(
26 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
32 of
81)
78
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alex Molcan
Player
Marco Cecchinato
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve %
67%
(
47 of
70)
4
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
7
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
28 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Roman Andres Burruchaga
Player
Marco Cecchinato
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
66
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marco Cecchinato
Player
Nicolas Kicker
76%
(
48 of
63)
1st Serve %
64%
(
29 of
45)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
35%
(
22 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Felix Gill
Player
Marco Cecchinato
55%
(
48 of
87)
1st Serve %
49%
(
37 of
75)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
43%
(
37 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
85
Total Points Won
77
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marco Cecchinato
Player
Guido Andreozzi
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve %
45%
(
31 of
69)
6
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
8
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
33 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Fatic Vs Cecchinato Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
