Nerman Fatic vs Jurij Rodionov Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
N. Fatic vs J. Rodionov

Nerman Fatic

BIH

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'3" (191 cm)

Height

6'3" (191 cm)

212

C. Rank

177

191

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$74.0K

Career Money

$530.9K

Right-Handed

Plays

Left-Handed

Jurij Rodionov

AUT

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'3" (191 cm)

Height

6'3" (191 cm)

212

C. Rank

177

191

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$74.0K

Career Money

$530.9K

Right-Handed

Plays

Left-Handed

Head-to-head: Fatic 1 - 0 Rodionov

They have played 2 sets in total, with Nerman Fatic winning 2 and Jurij Rodionov winning 0. The last match between Nerman Fatic and Jurij Rodionov was at the Salzburg Challenger, 13-07-2023, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Nerman Fatic getting the victory 7-5 6-4.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Fatic	1
Rodionov	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R2) Salzburg Challenger(07-13-23)

Stats

Nerman Fatic

Jurij Rodionov

N. Fatic vs J. Rodionov H2H Profile

N. Fatic	Stats	J. Rodionov
$73,995	Career Prize Money	$530,915
58.47% (404-287)	Career Total W/L	56.54% (320-246)
1	Clay	0
12	Titles	8
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0.00% (0-1)	YTD Win/Loss	60.00% (3-2)

N. Fatic vs J. Rodionov Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nerman Fatic has won 44.96% of points on their second serve, while Jurij Rodionov has won 45.84%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nerman Fatic, in recent form, has won 45.79% of their opponent's second serve points, while Jurij Rodionov has won 45.33%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.53% and 27.58% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Nerman Fatic has saved 53.66% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jurij Rodionov has saved 53.04% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Nerman Fatic has won 72.31% of matches played (W/L 47/18), with Jurij Rodionov winning 57.75% (W/L 41/30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Nerman Fatic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 341/218), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/2). Jurij Rodionov has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 61% (W/L 110/68), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 39% (W/L 11/17).
Player level: In the last year, Nerman Fatic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 64.10% of matches (W/L 25/14), where as Jurij Rodionov has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 61.40% of matches (W/L 35/22). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Nerman Fatic winning 1 times and Jurij Rodionov being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Nerman Fatic winning 2 and Jurij Rodionov winning 0.
The last match between Nerman Fatic and Jurij Rodionov was at the Salzburg Challenger, 13-07-2023, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Nerman Fatic getting the victory 7-5 6-4.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:39:50.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nerman Fatic has played against opponents with an average rank of 326.03 while Jurij Rodionov has played against players with an average rank of 247.06.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nerman Fatic has won 81% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jurij Rodionov has won 66% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Nerman Fatic has converted 30.72% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jurij Rodionov has converted 34.29% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Nerman Fatic vs Jurij Rodionov Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

N. Fatic vs J. Rodionov H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

N. Fatic	Stats	J. Rodionov
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
13	Games Won	9
7	Aces (Total)	1
4	Total Double Faults	1
1:39:50	Average Match Time	1:39:50
54% (34/63)	1st Serve %	50% (33/66)
82% (28/34)	1st Serve Win %	76% (25/33)
55% (16/29)	2nd Serve Win %	45% (15/33)
43% (3/7)	Break Pts Won %	25% (1/4)
39% (26/66)	Return Points Win %	30% (19/63)
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

N. Fatic Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Bergamo Challenger - 17-11-2025
R2 Federico ArnaboldiF. Arnaboldi	L	7-5 4-6 7-5	Stats
R1 Fabrizio AndaloroF. Andaloro	W	6-4 6-6 ret.	Stats
Helsinki Challenger - 03-11-2025
R1 Calvin HemeryC. Hemery	L	6-3 7-6(4)	Stats
M15 Bol - 20-10-2025
R2 Marko MiladinovicM. Miladinovic	L	7-6(2) ret.	Stats
R1 Antonio VoljavecA. Voljavec	W	6-2 6-3	Stats

View All

J. Rodionov Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Davis Cup, World Group, QF, ITA-AUT 2-0 - 17-11-2025
Rubber 1 Matteo BerrettiniM. Berrettini	L	6-3 7-6(4)	Stats
Taipei Challenger - 03-11-2025
R2 Masamichi ImamuraM. Imamura	L	6-4 6-0	Stats
R1 Ji Sung NamJ. Sung	W	2-6 7-6(3) 6-2	Stats
Seoul Challenger - 27-10-2025
QF Elias YmerE. Ymer	L	6-4 3-6 6-2	Stats
R2 Yuta ShimizuY. Shimizu	W	2-6 7-5 6-4	Stats

View All

N. Fatic vs J. Rodionov Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

N. Fatic	Stats	J. Rodionov
58.47% (404/287)	YTD Win/Loss	56.54% (320/246)
57.49% (890/658)	Sets Win/Loss	55.01% (746/610)
53.03% (7602/6734)	Games Win/Loss	51.33% (6724/6375)
51.19% (43/41)	Hard Win/Loss	56.76% (84/64)
61.00% (341/218)	Clay Win/Loss	54.50% (109/91)
43.48% (20/26)	Indoor Hard W/L	61.05% (116/74)
0.00% (0/2)	Grass Win/Loss	39.29% (11/17)
0.23	Aces Per Game	0.44
1598	Aces Total	2812
0.22	Double Faults Per Game	0.23
1517	Total Double Faults	1478
1:20:1	Average Match Time	1:33:39
509.22	Average Opponent Rank	420.63
66% (23791/35820)	1st Serve %	61% (23874/39269)
65% (15579/23791)	1st Serve Win %	70% (16826/23874)
48% (5772/12029)	2nd Serve Win %	50% (7622/15395)
47% (1969/4222)	Break Points Won % (Total)	41% (1422/3457)
43% (15618/36165)	Return Points Win %	38% (14610/38816)
20.00% (1/4)	Slam W/L	45.00% (18/22)
0.00% (0/1)	Masters W/L	30.00% (3/7)
40.00% (4/6)	Cups W/L	53.85% (7/6)
25.00% (3/9)	Main Tour W/L	41.43% (29/41)
52.89% (119/106)	Challenger W/L	59.89% (215/144)
63.24% (277/161)	Futures W/L	64.86% (48/26)
60% (394/662)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	56% (314/556)
0% (0/3)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	33% (2/6)
51% (79/156)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	55% (116/211)
54% (102/189)	Deciding Set Win %	52% (114/220)
88% (394/348)	1st Set Won, Won Match	83% (310/257)
11% (394/42)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	17% (310/53)
19% (297/57)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	24% (256/62)