Nerman Fatic vs Gianluca Mager Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
N. Fatic vs G. Mager

Nerman Fatic

BIH

1

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

6'3" (191 cm)

Height

6'2" (188 cm)

214

C. Rank

899

191

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$74.0K

Career Money

$668.3K

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Gianluca Mager

ITA

1

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

6'3" (191 cm)

Height

6'2" (188 cm)

214

C. Rank

899

191

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$74.0K

Career Money

$668.3K

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Fatic 1 - 1 Mager

They have played 4 sets in total, with Nerman Fatic winning 2 and Gianluca Mager winning 2. The last match between Gianluca Mager and Nerman Fatic was at the Antalya Challenger, 10-03-2023, Round: QF, Surface: Clay, with Gianluca Mager getting the victory 6-4 1-0 ret..

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Fatic	1
Mager	1

Last 2 H2H Matches:

(QF) Antalya Challenger(03-10-23)

Stats

Gianluca Mager

Nerman Fatic

(R1) Trieste Challenger(07-19-22)

Stats

Nerman Fatic

Gianluca Mager

N. Fatic vs G. Mager H2H Profile

N. Fatic	Stats	G. Mager
$73,995	Career Prize Money	$668,315
58.49% (403-286)	Career Total W/L	54.83% (403-332)
1	Clay	1
12	Titles	11
1	Total H2H Matches	1
0.00% (0-1)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

N. Fatic vs G. Mager Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nerman Fatic has won 44.18% of points on their second serve, while Gianluca Mager has won 46.83%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nerman Fatic, in recent form, has won 45.12% of their opponent's second serve points, while Gianluca Mager has won 43.56%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.43% and 23.20% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Nerman Fatic has saved 53.99% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Gianluca Mager has saved 70.45% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Nerman Fatic has won 75.00% of matches played (W/L 51/17), with Gianluca Mager winning 22.73% (W/L 5/17) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Nerman Fatic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 341/218), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/2). Gianluca Mager has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 330/236), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 44% (W/L 28/35).
Player level: In the last year, Nerman Fatic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 64.86% of matches (W/L 24/13), where as Gianluca Mager has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 23.81% of matches (W/L 5/16). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Nerman Fatic winning 1 times and Gianluca Mager being victorious 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Nerman Fatic winning 2 and Gianluca Mager winning 2.
The last match between Nerman Fatic and Gianluca Mager was at the Antalya Challenger, 10-03-2023, Round: QF, Surface: Clay, with Gianluca Mager getting the victory 6-4 1-0 ret..
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:58:32.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nerman Fatic has played against opponents with an average rank of 345.6 while Gianluca Mager has played against players with an average rank of 338.18.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nerman Fatic has won 89% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Gianluca Mager has won 29% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Nerman Fatic has converted 35.90% of breakpoint opportunities, and Gianluca Mager has converted 21.43% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Nerman Fatic vs Gianluca Mager Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

N. Fatic vs G. Mager H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

N. Fatic	Stats	G. Mager
1	H2H Matches Won	1
2	Sets Won	2
16	Games Won	10
6	Aces (Total)	8
7	Total Double Faults	7
0:58:32	Average Match Time	0:58:32
52% (48/93)	1st Serve %	57% (47/82)
73% (35/48)	1st Serve Win %	64% (30/47)
53% (24/45)	2nd Serve Win %	46% (16/35)
50% (4/8)	Break Pts Won %	22% (2/9)
44% (36/82)	Return Points Win %	37% (34/93)
50% (1/2)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	50% (1/2)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	100% (1/1)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/1)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

N. Fatic Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Helsinki Challenger - 03-11-2025
R1 Calvin HemeryC. Hemery	L	6-3 7-6(4)	Stats
M15 Bol - 20-10-2025
R2 Marko MiladinovicM. Miladinovic	L	7-6(2) ret.	Stats
R1 Antonio VoljavecA. Voljavec	W	6-2 6-3	Stats
Olbia Challenger - 13-10-2025
QF Hugo GrenierH. Grenier	L	6-3 6-4	Stats
R2 Carlo Alberto CaniatoC. Alberto	W	3-6 6-3 6-3	Stats

View All

G. Mager Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
San Marino Challenger - 14-07-2025
Q1 Oleg PrihodkoO. Prihodko	L	6-4 6-1	Stats
Milan Challenger - 23-06-2025
Q1 Giovanni FonioG. Fonio	L	6-3 6-3	Stats
Sassuolo Challenger - 16-06-2025
Q1 Ryan NijboerR. Nijboer	L	7-5 ret.	Stats
Perugia Challenger - 09-06-2025
Q1 Alexander WeisA. Weis	L	7-5 7-6(10)	Stats
Turin Challenger - 12-05-2025
Q1 Oleg PrihodkoO. Prihodko	L	7-6(3) 6-2	Stats

View All

N. Fatic vs G. Mager Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

N. Fatic	Stats	G. Mager
58.49% (403/286)	YTD Win/Loss	54.83% (403/332)
57.51% (888/656)	Sets Win/Loss	53.99% (927/790)
53.04% (7574/6706)	Games Win/Loss	51.64% (8474/7935)
51.19% (43/41)	Hard Win/Loss	45.00% (36/44)
61.00% (341/218)	Clay Win/Loss	58.30% (330/236)
43.18% (19/25)	Indoor Hard W/L	40.74% (33/48)
0.00% (0/2)	Grass Win/Loss	50.00% (4/4)
0.23	Aces Per Game	0.4
1568	Aces Total	3237
0.22	Double Faults Per Game	0.21
1510	Total Double Faults	1701
1:19:52	Average Match Time	1:16:29
509.43	Average Opponent Rank	209.68
66% (23679/35628)	1st Serve %	59% (24011/40961)
65% (15504/23679)	1st Serve Win %	71% (17163/24011)
48% (5733/11949)	2nd Serve Win %	50% (8456/16950)
47% (1961/4201)	Break Points Won % (Total)	40% (1557/3930)
43% (15552/35990)	Return Points Win %	38% (15918/41684)
20.00% (1/4)	Slam W/L	28.57% (6/15)
0.00% (0/1)	Masters W/L	36.84% (7/12)
40.00% (4/6)	Cups W/L	100.00% (1/0)
25.00% (3/9)	Main Tour W/L	47.54% (29/32)
52.91% (118/105)	Challenger W/L	52.80% (217/194)
63.24% (277/161)	Futures W/L	64.41% (143/79)
60% (394/661)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	56% (395/702)
0% (0/3)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	18% (3/17)
51% (79/156)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	52% (141/272)
54% (102/188)	Deciding Set Win %	52% (124/239)
88% (393/347)	1st Set Won, Won Match	83% (402/334)
11% (393/42)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	17% (402/67)
19% (296/57)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	20% (333/66)