Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Nerman Fatic vs Emiliano Maggioli Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Fatic vs Maggioli analysis and find out who is favored!
Nerman Fatic vs Emiliano Maggioli Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Fatic has won 47.76% of points on his second serve, while Maggioli has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Fatic, in recent form, has won 46.69% of his opponent's second serve points, while Maggioli has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.08% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Fatic has saved 56.99% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Maggioli has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Fatic has won 53.62% of matches played (W/L 37/ 32), with Maggioli winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Fatic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 279/ 189), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Maggioli has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 34/ 21), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 43% (W/L 3/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Fatic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 24/ 24), where as Maggioli has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Fatic winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Fatic winning 2 and Maggioli winning 0. The last match between Fatic and Maggioli was at the M25 Santa Margherita Di Pula, 05-10-2019, Semifinals, Clay with Nerman Fatic getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:36:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Fatic and Maggioli have played a deciding set 0 times, with Fatic winning 0 times and Maggioli 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Fatic winning 0, and Maggioli 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Fatic has played against opponents with an average rank of 273.17 while Maggioli has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Fatic has won 48% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Maggioli has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Fatic has converted 40.89% of breakpoint opportunities, and Maggioli has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Fatic 1 - 0 Maggioli
212
Rank
191
High
29
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
569
High
22
Age
Plays
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
Form
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
57% (339-252)
Career Total W/L
58% (80-57)
40% (6-9)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$73,995
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Nerman Fatic | Emiliano Maggioli |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 5 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:36:0 | 1:36:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 77% (40/52) | 65% (45/69) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 60% (24/40) | 44% (20/45) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (6/12) | 46% (11/24) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (6/12) | 43% (3/7) |
| Return Points W% | 55% (38/69) | 42% (22/52) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Nerman Fatic
Player
Emiliano Maggioli
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
1
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
22 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
38 of
69)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Nerman Fatic | Emiliano Maggioli |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 40% (6/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 43% (15/20) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 46% (150/179) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 25% (2/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.43 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 70 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.2 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 33 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:33:7 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 343.87 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (574/926) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (393/574) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (167/352) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 33% (27/81) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (360/982) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 30% (3/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 40% (6/15) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 60% (3/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 40% (2/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 71% (7/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 29% (7/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 13% (8/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Nerman Fatic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Alejandro Moro Canas
Player
Nerman Fatic
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Edoardo Lavagno
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
23 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zsombor Piros
Player
Nerman Fatic
73%
(
57 of
78)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
85)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
85)
89
Total Points Won
74
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Riccardo Bonadio
Player
Nerman Fatic
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve %
58%
(
29 of
50)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
55%
(
22 of
40)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
45%
(
29 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ugo Blanchet
Player
Nerman Fatic
59%
(
42 of
71)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
25 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
21 of
51)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dimitar Kuzmanov
Player
Nerman Fatic
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
70%
(
52 of
74)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
6-0 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Franco Agamenone
Player
Nerman Fatic
73%
(
66 of
91)
1st Serve %
56%
(
50 of
89)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
55%
(
36 of
66)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
39)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
43%
(
39 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
45 of
89)
97
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
69%
(
59 of
86)
1st Serve %
64%
(
63 of
99)
9
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
45 of
59)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
28 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
99)
103
Total Points Won
82
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jakub Mensik
Player
Nerman Fatic
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
9
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Goncalo Oliveira
65%
(
56 of
86)
1st Serve %
69%
(
49 of
71)
9
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
0
79%
(
44 of
56)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
40 of
49)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
15 of
22)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
26 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
23%
(
16 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(3) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Emiliano Maggioli Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Fabrizio Andaloro
Player
Emiliano Maggioli
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve %
45%
(
18 of
40)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
13 of
18)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
56
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Andrew Paulson
Player
Emiliano Maggioli
65%
(
51 of
78)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
73)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
29 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
28 of
73)
77
Total Points Won
74
|
6-2 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emiliano Maggioli
Player
Chien-Hsun Lo
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve %
61%
(
23 of
38)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
16 of
21)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
7 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
53
Total Points Won
18
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emiliano Maggioli
Player
Adrian Oetzbach
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
2
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
4
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
21 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marek Gengel
Player
Emiliano Maggioli
79%
(
73 of
92)
1st Serve %
64%
(
65 of
102)
3
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
2
78%
(
57 of
73)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
44 of
65)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
25 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
37 of
102)
104
Total Points Won
90
|
6-3 6-7(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emiliano Maggioli
Player
Mason Recci
60%
(
63 of
105)
1st Serve %
68%
(
66 of
97)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
47 of
66)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
39%
(
41 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
36 of
97)
100
Total Points Won
102
|
5-7 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emiliano Maggioli
Player
Daniil Ostapenkov
70%
(
62 of
88)
1st Serve %
76%
(
53 of
70)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
41%
(
36 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
70)
86
Total Points Won
72
|
3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Francesco Vilardo
Player
Emiliano Maggioli
63%
(
62 of
98)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
82)
4
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
58%
(
21 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
39 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
82)
91
Total Points Won
89
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emiliano Maggioli
Player
Loic Cloes
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
4
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emiliano Maggioli
Player
Nikoloz Davlianidze
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
76%
(
50 of
66)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
47%
(
29 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
59
|
4-6 6-3 10-6 | H2H | ||
view more
Fatic Vs Maggioli Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
