MATCHSTAT PRO

Every edge, every game, every day

New customer offer
One Sport
All Sports Promo
Tennis
$29.99/billed monthly
  • Unlimited daily predictions
  • Unlock best bets with edge
  • Access all tipster picks
  • Filter & segment data
  • Unlock all models
  • CANCEL ANYTIME
Subscribe

Nerman Fatic vs Dusan Obradovic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

By Wojtek Kolan

Head-to-head: Fatic 2 - 0 Obradovic

They have played 4 sets in total, with Fatic winning 4 and Obradovic winning 0. The last match between Fatic and Obradovic was at the M15 Antalya, 19-02-2025, First, Clay with Nerman Fatic getting the victory 6-4 6-0.

M15 Antalya(19-02-2025)

92% (11-1)
YTD Win/Loss
50% (3-3)
2
Head-to-Head
0
398
Ranking
610
191
Highest Rank
511
30
Age
23
R
Plays
-
10
Titles
1
58% (368-270)
Career Total W/L
54% (128-110)
$73,995
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
0
Hard H2H
0
2
Clay H2H
0
0
Indoor H2H
0
0
Grass H2H
0

Upcoming Match

ODDS

N. Fatic

To Win

T. Skatov

To Win

Upcoming Match

ODDS

D. Obradovic

To Win

F. Agamenone

To Win

Today’s Tennis Tips:

Sabalenka VS Andreeva PREDICTION Hard

BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells wta

15 Mar 2025 / Final

ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE

Aryna Sabalenka

To Win

69.83 %
5.73%

Draper VS Alcaraz PREDICTION Hard

BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells atp

15 Mar 2025 / Semifinals

ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE

Jack Draper

To Win

30.95 %
9.3%

Fatic VS Obradovic H2H Matches played

Winning Player Losing Player Score
6-4 6-0
cross
Nerman Fatic
Player
Dusan Obradovic
65% ( 26 of 40)
1st Serve %
53% ( 27 of 51)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
81% ( 21 of 26)
1st Serve Won
41% ( 11 of 27)
64% ( 9 of 14)
2nd Serve Won
42% ( 10 of 24)
83% ( 5 of 6)
Break Points Won
100% ( 1 of 1)
25% ( 10 of 40)
Rtn Points Won
59% ( 30 of 51)
60
Total Points Won
31
6-1 6-1
cross
Nerman Fatic
Player
Dusan Obradovic
46% ( 19 of 41)
1st Serve %
52% ( 27 of 52)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
100% ( 19 of 19)
1st Serve Won
44% ( 12 of 27)
55% ( 12 of 22)
2nd Serve Won
48% ( 12 of 25)
71% ( 5 of 7)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 2)
24% ( 10 of 41)
Rtn Points Won
54% ( 28 of 52)
59
Total Points Won
34

Fatic VS Obradovic H2H Stats

Nerman Fatic Fatic
Stats
Dusan Obradovic Obradovic
2
H2H Matches
0
4
Sets Won
0
24
Games Won
6
8
Aces (Total)
2
8
Total Double Faults
9
0:47:32
Average Match Time
0:47:32
56% (45/81)
1st Serve %
52% (54/103)
89% (40/45)
1st Serve Win %
43% (23/54)
58% (21/36)
2nd Serve Win %
45% (22/49)
77% (10/13)
Break Points Won % (Total)
33% (1/3)
56% (58/103)
Return Points Win %
25% (20/81)
100% (2/2)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
0% (0/2)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/0)
100% (2/2)
1st Set Won, Won Match
0% (0/0)
0% (2/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (2/0)

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

Nerman Fatic vs Dusan Obradovic Important H2H Prediction Stats:

Head-to-head: Nerman Fatic 2 - 0 Dusan Obradovic

Predictions Insights for the Upcoming Tennis Match:

Examining the recent performance of both players will unveil crucial statistics that can significantly influence the outcome of the match.

Second serve performance recent form:

Assessing their performances in the last six months, it becomes evident that Fatic has triumphed in 46.67% of points on their second serve. In contrast, Obradovic has exhibited a slightly higher success rate, winning 48.37% of these points. It is worth noting that there exists a substantial correlation between this particular statistic and the accuracy of match predictions.

Return game stats recent form:

Delving into the return game statistics, recent form indicates that Fatic has impressively secured victory in 52.24% of their opponent's second serve points. Notably, Obradovic has also displayed a commendable performance, winning 52.82% of such points. Comparable statistics exist for first serve returns, with Fatic achieving a 35.98% success rate and Obradovic with a slightly superior performance rate at 36.2%. These figures bear great relevance in predicting the favorite in this particular head-to-head matchup.

Under pressure analysis:

When subjected to intense pressure, Fatic has shown remarkable resilience by saving an impressive 51.16% of breakpoints in recent matches. Meanwhile, Obradovic has also demonstrated remarkable composure by saving 55.32% of breakpoints. This statistic proves to be highly valuable when making predictions for in-game betting.

Performance overview:

A comprehensive overview of their performances in the past year reveals that Fatic has emerged victorious in 45.24% of matches played (Win/Loss ratio: 19/23). In contrast, Obradovic has exemplified dominance, winning 59.09% of matches (Win/Loss ratio: 39/27). This analysis provides a holistic prediction for the head-to-head clash between the two players.

Best surface:

Examining their performances based on the playing surfaces, Fatic has excelled on clay with a win percentage of 59% (Win/Loss ratio: 297/203), while disappointingly struggling on grass with a win percentage of 0% (Win/Loss ratio: 0/2). In contrast, Obradovic has showcased exceptional skills on clay, winning 58% of matches (Win/Loss ratio: 120/87), but has faced challenges on hard courts, only securing victory in 25% of matches (Win/Loss ratio: 6/18).

Player level:

An investigation into their match statistics from the previous year divulges that Fatic has primarily competed in Challengers/ITF tournaments worth more than $10,000. Within this realm, they have achieved success in 36% of matches played (Win/Loss ratio: 9/16). Conversely, Obradovic has predominantly participated in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments with a value of $10,000, where they have secured victory in 60% of matches played (Win/Loss ratio: 36/24). When comparing the players' statistics to predict the favored contender, it is crucial to consider the event level at which they have been competing.

Direct H2H matches:

Throughout their previous encounters, Fatic has emerged triumphant in all their face-offs against Obradovic. They have contested a total of two sets, with Fatic winning both encounters. The last match between the two players took place at the M15 Zlatibor on September 18, 2019, on clay courts, where Fatic decisively secured a 6-1 6-1 victory.

Head to head match duration:

In their previous head-to-head matches, the average duration of the matches between these players was recorded as 0 hours 41 minutes.

Deciding set H2H prediction:

In significant deciding set scenarios, Fatic and Obradovic have faced each other on numerous occasions. Impressively, Fatic has emerged victorious in all such instances, while Obradovic has not managed to secure victory in any deciding sets. This statistic serves as a valuable indicator when predicting the outcome in the event of a match that goes the distance.

Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations:

In intense tiebreak situations against each other, Fatic and Obradovic have not played any tiebreaks.

Opponent quality stats:

Assessing their performances against opponents in the last 12 months, Fatic has encountered opponents with an average ranking of 319.5. On the other hand, Obradovic has faced adversaries with an average ranking of 300.64.

Deciding set performance vs all players:

For those interested in live predictions and betting, if the match enters into a deciding set, Fatic has emerged victorious in 36% of deciding sets played over the past 12 months. Comparatively, Obradovic has displayed significant dominance by securing victory in 56% of all matches played on the tour.

Current event H2H stats:

While past player performance serves as a valuable tool for predicting tennis matches, once a particular event is underway, it is crucial to consider the current event statistics to gauge the form of the players. Analysis of these up-to-date statistics can aid in predicting the outcome accurately. For current event stats, kindly refer to the section below.

Break point conversion:

Recent form suggests that Fatic has impressively converted 47.78% of breakpoint opportunities, indicating a knack for seizing crucial moments in the match. Conversely, Obradovic has converted 42% of their chances to break their opponent's serve. This statistic serves as a significant factor to consider for in-game live betting tips when either player is presented with a breakpoint opportunity.

If you are interested in models that accurately predict tennis matches, this article serves as an excellent starting point (Warning: For avid statistics enthusiasts only).

Nerman Fatic Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
SF
cross
Nerman Fatic
Player
Mili Poljicak
77% ( 51 of 66)
1st Serve %
70% ( 54 of 77)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
69% ( 35 of 51)
1st Serve Won
54% ( 29 of 54)
27% ( 4 of 15)
2nd Serve Won
35% ( 8 of 23)
64% ( 7 of 11)
Break Points Won
80% ( 4 of 5)
41% ( 27 of 66)
Rtn Points Won
52% ( 40 of 77)
79
Total Points Won
64
W
3-6 6-3 6-1 H2H
QF
cross
Nerman Fatic
Player
Jan Kupcic
79% ( 33 of 42)
1st Serve %
58% ( 26 of 45)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
82% ( 27 of 33)
1st Serve Won
46% ( 12 of 26)
44% ( 4 of 9)
2nd Serve Won
37% ( 7 of 19)
63% ( 5 of 8)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 2)
26% ( 11 of 42)
Rtn Points Won
58% ( 26 of 45)
57
Total Points Won
30
W
6-1 6-1 H2H
R2
cross
Nerman Fatic
Player
Nemanja Malesevic
40% ( 4 of 10)
1st Serve %
73% ( 16 of 22)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
100% ( 4 of 4)
1st Serve Won
44% ( 7 of 16)
50% ( 3 of 6)
2nd Serve Won
50% ( 3 of 6)
25% ( 1 of 4)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
30% ( 3 of 10)
Rtn Points Won
55% ( 12 of 22)
19
Total Points Won
13
W
6-3 6-4 H2H
R1
cross
Nerman Fatic
Player
Ante Petar Ercegovic
48% ( 14 of 29)
1st Serve %
46% ( 19 of 41)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
100% ( 14 of 14)
1st Serve Won
37% ( 7 of 19)
67% ( 10 of 15)
2nd Serve Won
32% ( 7 of 22)
75% ( 6 of 8)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
17% ( 5 of 29)
Rtn Points Won
66% ( 27 of 41)
51
Total Points Won
19
W
6-0 6-1 H2H
QF
cross
Mirza Basic
Player
Nerman Fatic
52% ( 34 of 65)
1st Serve %
62% ( 33 of 53)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
79% ( 27 of 34)
1st Serve Won
67% ( 22 of 33)
39% ( 12 of 31)
2nd Serve Won
15% ( 3 of 20)
71% ( 5 of 7)
Break Points Won
33% ( 2 of 6)
40% ( 26 of 65)
Rtn Points Won
53% ( 28 of 53)
67
Total Points Won
51
L
6-3 6-2 H2H
R2
cross
Nerman Fatic
Player
Giuseppe La Vela
53% ( 21 of 40)
1st Serve %
64% ( 38 of 59)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
71% ( 15 of 21)
1st Serve Won
53% ( 20 of 38)
63% ( 12 of 19)
2nd Serve Won
24% ( 5 of 21)
50% ( 6 of 12)
Break Points Won
25% ( 1 of 4)
33% ( 13 of 40)
Rtn Points Won
58% ( 34 of 59)
61
Total Points Won
38
W
6-1 6-2 H2H
R1
cross
Nerman Fatic
Player
Kaya Arinc
49% ( 33 of 68)
1st Serve %
74% ( 49 of 66)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
70% ( 23 of 33)
1st Serve Won
59% ( 29 of 49)
54% ( 19 of 35)
2nd Serve Won
41% ( 7 of 17)
50% ( 5 of 10)
Break Points Won
43% ( 3 of 7)
38% ( 26 of 68)
Rtn Points Won
45% ( 30 of 66)
72
Total Points Won
62
W
7-5 6-4 H2H
F
cross
Nerman Fatic
Player
Andrej Nedic
66% ( 35 of 53)
1st Serve %
57% ( 24 of 42)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
66% ( 23 of 35)
1st Serve Won
67% ( 16 of 24)
50% ( 9 of 18)
2nd Serve Won
39% ( 7 of 18)
75% ( 3 of 4)
Break Points Won
14% ( 1 of 7)
40% ( 21 of 53)
Rtn Points Won
45% ( 19 of 42)
51
Total Points Won
44
W
6-2 6-3 H2H
SF
cross
Nerman Fatic
Player
Pietro Marino
68% ( 54 of 80)
1st Serve %
72% ( 53 of 74)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
67% ( 36 of 54)
1st Serve Won
57% ( 30 of 53)
50% ( 13 of 26)
2nd Serve Won
48% ( 10 of 21)
50% ( 5 of 10)
Break Points Won
25% ( 2 of 8)
39% ( 31 of 80)
Rtn Points Won
46% ( 34 of 74)
83
Total Points Won
71
W
2-6 6-2 6-0 H2H
QF
cross
Nerman Fatic
Player
Mirza Basic
66% ( 51 of 77)
1st Serve %
74% ( 58 of 78)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
63% ( 32 of 51)
1st Serve Won
55% ( 32 of 58)
62% ( 16 of 26)
2nd Serve Won
50% ( 10 of 20)
54% ( 7 of 13)
Break Points Won
57% ( 4 of 7)
38% ( 29 of 77)
Rtn Points Won
46% ( 36 of 78)
84
Total Points Won
71
W
4-6 6-4 6-1 H2H

Dusan Obradovic Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
R1
cross
Samuele Pieri
Player
Dusan Obradovic
66% ( 61 of 93)
1st Serve %
64% ( 47 of 73)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
57% ( 35 of 61)
1st Serve Won
53% ( 25 of 47)
59% ( 19 of 32)
2nd Serve Won
38% ( 10 of 26)
71% ( 5 of 7)
Break Points Won
24% ( 4 of 17)
42% ( 39 of 93)
Rtn Points Won
52% ( 38 of 73)
92
Total Points Won
74
L
2-6 6-2 6-3 H2H
R1
cross
Nerman Fatic
Player
Dusan Obradovic
65% ( 26 of 40)
1st Serve %
53% ( 27 of 51)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
81% ( 21 of 26)
1st Serve Won
41% ( 11 of 27)
64% ( 9 of 14)
2nd Serve Won
42% ( 10 of 24)
83% ( 5 of 6)
Break Points Won
100% ( 1 of 1)
25% ( 10 of 40)
Rtn Points Won
59% ( 30 of 51)
60
Total Points Won
31
L
6-4 6-0 H2H
SF
cross
Akira Santillan
Player
Dusan Obradovic
77% ( 55 of 71)
1st Serve %
61% ( 30 of 49)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
55% ( 30 of 55)
1st Serve Won
57% ( 17 of 30)
56% ( 9 of 16)
2nd Serve Won
16% ( 3 of 19)
60% ( 6 of 10)
Break Points Won
19% ( 3 of 16)
45% ( 32 of 71)
Rtn Points Won
59% ( 29 of 49)
68
Total Points Won
52
L
6-2 6-4 H2H
QF
cross
Dusan Obradovic
Player
John Sperle
65% ( 55 of 84)
1st Serve %
66% ( 46 of 70)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
62% ( 34 of 55)
1st Serve Won
39% ( 18 of 46)
34% ( 10 of 29)
2nd Serve Won
54% ( 13 of 24)
54% ( 7 of 13)
Break Points Won
45% ( 5 of 11)
48% ( 40 of 84)
Rtn Points Won
56% ( 39 of 70)
83
Total Points Won
71
W
6-3 7-5 H2H
R2
cross
Dusan Obradovic
Player
Alessandro Battiston
76% ( 34 of 45)
1st Serve %
58% ( 28 of 48)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
65% ( 22 of 34)
1st Serve Won
46% ( 13 of 28)
55% ( 6 of 11)
2nd Serve Won
25% ( 5 of 20)
100% ( 6 of 6)
Break Points Won
40% ( 2 of 5)
38% ( 17 of 45)
Rtn Points Won
63% ( 30 of 48)
58
Total Points Won
35
W
6-3 6-1 H2H
R1
cross
Dusan Obradovic
Player
Antoni Fabre
56% ( 54 of 97)
1st Serve %
67% ( 56 of 83)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
57% ( 31 of 54)
1st Serve Won
59% ( 33 of 56)
49% ( 21 of 43)
2nd Serve Won
37% ( 10 of 27)
50% ( 5 of 10)
Break Points Won
75% ( 6 of 8)
46% ( 45 of 97)
Rtn Points Won
48% ( 40 of 83)
92
Total Points Won
88
W
7-6(4) 1-6 6-2 H2H
R1
cross
Martin Klizan
Player
Dusan Obradovic
66% ( 31 of 47)
1st Serve %
65% ( 30 of 46)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
81% ( 25 of 31)
1st Serve Won
57% ( 17 of 30)
63% ( 10 of 16)
2nd Serve Won
31% ( 5 of 16)
57% ( 4 of 7)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 2)
26% ( 12 of 47)
Rtn Points Won
52% ( 24 of 46)
59
Total Points Won
34
L
6-0 6-4 H2H
R2
cross
Martin Klizan
Player
Dusan Obradovic
72% ( 36 of 50)
1st Serve %
63% ( 25 of 40)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
83% ( 30 of 36)
1st Serve Won
60% ( 15 of 25)
50% ( 7 of 14)
2nd Serve Won
60% ( 9 of 15)
60% ( 3 of 5)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 1)
26% ( 13 of 50)
Rtn Points Won
40% ( 16 of 40)
53
Total Points Won
37
L
6-3 6-2 H2H
R1
cross
Dusan Obradovic
Player
William Bartram
54% ( 25 of 46)
1st Serve %
63% ( 37 of 59)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
84% ( 21 of 25)
1st Serve Won
65% ( 24 of 37)
76% ( 16 of 21)
2nd Serve Won
41% ( 9 of 22)
38% ( 3 of 8)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
20% ( 9 of 46)
Rtn Points Won
44% ( 26 of 59)
63
Total Points Won
42
W
6-2 6-4 H2H
R2
cross
Maxence Bertimon
Player
Dusan Obradovic
63% ( 68 of 108)
1st Serve %
63% ( 68 of 108)
4
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
3
69% ( 47 of 68)
1st Serve Won
60% ( 41 of 68)
43% ( 17 of 40)
2nd Serve Won
50% ( 20 of 40)
33% ( 5 of 15)
Break Points Won
36% ( 4 of 11)
41% ( 44 of 108)
Rtn Points Won
44% ( 47 of 108)
111
Total Points Won
105
L
4-6 6-4 6-4 H2H
banner

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

58% (368/270)
Win/Loss
54% (128/110)
57% (816/617)
Sets Win/Loss
53% (293/257)
53% (6980/6223)
Games Win/Loss
52% (2686/2522)
51% (41/40)
Hard Win/Loss
25% (6/18)
60% (308/204)
Clay Win/Loss
57% (120/89)
44% (19/24)
Indoor Hard W/L
40% (2/3)
0% (0/2)
Grass Win/Loss
0% (0/0)
0.22
Aces Per Game
0.16
1389
Aces Total
411
0.22
Double Faults Per Game
0.12
1418
Total Double Faults
302
1:18:10
Average Match Time
1:10:31
511.13
Average Opponent Rank
360.97
67% (21571/32331)
1st Serve %
58% (6929/11957)
65% (14048/21571)
1st Serve Win %
66% (4542/6929)
48% (5123/10760)
2nd Serve Win %
51% (2560/5028)
47% (1785/3800)
Break Points Won % (Total)
44% (566/1301)
43% (14108/32571)
Return Points Win %
42% (5040/12099)
20% (1/4)
Slam W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)
Masters W/L
0% (0/0)
44% (4/5)
Cups W/L
0% (0/0)
25% (3/9)
Main Tour W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
51% (94/92)
Challenger W/L
50% (3/3)
63% (266/159)
Futures W/L
54% (125/107)
59% (359/612)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
54% (128/237)
0% (0/3)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
51% (72/141)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
52% (25/48)
53% (93/177)
Deciding Set Win %
51% (38/75)
88% (362/318)
1st Set Won, Won Match
81% (132/107)
11% (362/40)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
18% (132/24)
18% (276/51)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
20% (106/21)

See recent tennis photos of Fatic and Obradovic

Potential H2H Matches This Week For Nerman Fatic

Zadar Challenger

Ymer vs Fatic H2H (), could play in The Quarterfinals

Prizmic vs Fatic H2H (), could play in The Quarterfinals

Andreev vs Fatic H2H (), could play in The Quarterfinals

Royer vs Fatic H2H (), could play in The Quarterfinals

Fatic vs Kopriva H2H (), could play in The Second round

Fatic vs Jover H2H (), could play in The Second round

View full predicted draw for Fatic

Other Predictions

Murcia Challenger

flag
flag
Prediction

Murcia Challenger

flag
flag
Prediction

Murcia Challenger

flag
flag
Prediction
  • Loading news...