N. Fatic
To Win
T. Skatov
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W W L W W W WForm
L W L L W W W L L LThey have played 4 sets in total, with Fatic winning 4 and Obradovic winning 0. The last match between Fatic and Obradovic was at the M15 Antalya, 19-02-2025, First, Clay with Nerman Fatic getting the victory 6-4 6-0.
M15 Antalya(19-02-2025)
- / First
- / Q1 round
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells wta
15 Mar 2025 / Final
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells atp
15 Mar 2025 / Semifinals
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 6-0 |
![]() ![]()
Nerman Fatic
Player
Dusan Obradovic
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
31
|
||||
6-1 6-1 |
![]() ![]()
Nerman Fatic
Player
Dusan Obradovic
46%
(
19 of
41)
1st Serve %
52%
(
27 of
52)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
100%
(
19 of
19)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
10 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Predictions Insights for the Upcoming Tennis Match:
Examining the recent performance of both players will unveil crucial statistics that can significantly influence the outcome of the match.
Second serve performance recent form:
Assessing their performances in the last six months, it becomes evident that Fatic has triumphed in 46.67% of points on their second serve. In contrast, Obradovic has exhibited a slightly higher success rate, winning 48.37% of these points. It is worth noting that there exists a substantial correlation between this particular statistic and the accuracy of match predictions.
Return game stats recent form:
Delving into the return game statistics, recent form indicates that Fatic has impressively secured victory in 52.24% of their opponent's second serve points. Notably, Obradovic has also displayed a commendable performance, winning 52.82% of such points. Comparable statistics exist for first serve returns, with Fatic achieving a 35.98% success rate and Obradovic with a slightly superior performance rate at 36.2%. These figures bear great relevance in predicting the favorite in this particular head-to-head matchup.
Under pressure analysis:
When subjected to intense pressure, Fatic has shown remarkable resilience by saving an impressive 51.16% of breakpoints in recent matches. Meanwhile, Obradovic has also demonstrated remarkable composure by saving 55.32% of breakpoints. This statistic proves to be highly valuable when making predictions for in-game betting.
Performance overview:
A comprehensive overview of their performances in the past year reveals that Fatic has emerged victorious in 45.24% of matches played (Win/Loss ratio: 19/23). In contrast, Obradovic has exemplified dominance, winning 59.09% of matches (Win/Loss ratio: 39/27). This analysis provides a holistic prediction for the head-to-head clash between the two players.
Best surface:
Examining their performances based on the playing surfaces, Fatic has excelled on clay with a win percentage of 59% (Win/Loss ratio: 297/203), while disappointingly struggling on grass with a win percentage of 0% (Win/Loss ratio: 0/2). In contrast, Obradovic has showcased exceptional skills on clay, winning 58% of matches (Win/Loss ratio: 120/87), but has faced challenges on hard courts, only securing victory in 25% of matches (Win/Loss ratio: 6/18).
Player level:
An investigation into their match statistics from the previous year divulges that Fatic has primarily competed in Challengers/ITF tournaments worth more than $10,000. Within this realm, they have achieved success in 36% of matches played (Win/Loss ratio: 9/16). Conversely, Obradovic has predominantly participated in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments with a value of $10,000, where they have secured victory in 60% of matches played (Win/Loss ratio: 36/24). When comparing the players' statistics to predict the favored contender, it is crucial to consider the event level at which they have been competing.
Direct H2H matches:
Throughout their previous encounters, Fatic has emerged triumphant in all their face-offs against Obradovic. They have contested a total of two sets, with Fatic winning both encounters. The last match between the two players took place at the M15 Zlatibor on September 18, 2019, on clay courts, where Fatic decisively secured a 6-1 6-1 victory.
Head to head match duration:
In their previous head-to-head matches, the average duration of the matches between these players was recorded as 0 hours 41 minutes.
Deciding set H2H prediction:
In significant deciding set scenarios, Fatic and Obradovic have faced each other on numerous occasions. Impressively, Fatic has emerged victorious in all such instances, while Obradovic has not managed to secure victory in any deciding sets. This statistic serves as a valuable indicator when predicting the outcome in the event of a match that goes the distance.
Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations:
In intense tiebreak situations against each other, Fatic and Obradovic have not played any tiebreaks.
Opponent quality stats:
Assessing their performances against opponents in the last 12 months, Fatic has encountered opponents with an average ranking of 319.5. On the other hand, Obradovic has faced adversaries with an average ranking of 300.64.
Deciding set performance vs all players:
For those interested in live predictions and betting, if the match enters into a deciding set, Fatic has emerged victorious in 36% of deciding sets played over the past 12 months. Comparatively, Obradovic has displayed significant dominance by securing victory in 56% of all matches played on the tour.
Current event H2H stats:
While past player performance serves as a valuable tool for predicting tennis matches, once a particular event is underway, it is crucial to consider the current event statistics to gauge the form of the players. Analysis of these up-to-date statistics can aid in predicting the outcome accurately. For current event stats, kindly refer to the section below.
Break point conversion:
Recent form suggests that Fatic has impressively converted 47.78% of breakpoint opportunities, indicating a knack for seizing crucial moments in the match. Conversely, Obradovic has converted 42% of their chances to break their opponent's serve. This statistic serves as a significant factor to consider for in-game live betting tips when either player is presented with a breakpoint opportunity.
If you are interested in models that accurately predict tennis matches, this article serves as an excellent starting point (Warning: For avid statistics enthusiasts only).
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SF |
![]() ![]()
Nerman Fatic
Player
Mili Poljicak
77%
(
51 of
66)
1st Serve %
70%
(
54 of
77)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
27%
(
4 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
41%
(
27 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
40 of
77)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
3-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Nerman Fatic
Player
Jan Kupcic
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Nerman Fatic
Player
Nemanja Malesevic
40%
(
4 of
10)
1st Serve %
73%
(
16 of
22)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
100%
(
4 of
4)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
50%
(
3 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
19
Total Points Won
13
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Nerman Fatic
Player
Ante Petar Ercegovic
48%
(
14 of
29)
1st Serve %
46%
(
19 of
41)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
100%
(
14 of
14)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
5 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
51
Total Points Won
19
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Mirza Basic
Player
Nerman Fatic
52%
(
34 of
65)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
39%
(
12 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
3 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
26 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Nerman Fatic
Player
Giuseppe La Vela
53%
(
21 of
40)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
13 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Nerman Fatic
Player
Kaya Arinc
49%
(
33 of
68)
1st Serve %
74%
(
49 of
66)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
26 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
72
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
F |
![]() ![]()
Nerman Fatic
Player
Andrej Nedic
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
57%
(
24 of
42)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
51
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Nerman Fatic
Player
Pietro Marino
68%
(
54 of
80)
1st Serve %
72%
(
53 of
74)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
31 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
83
Total Points Won
71
|
2-6 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Nerman Fatic
Player
Mirza Basic
66%
(
51 of
77)
1st Serve %
74%
(
58 of
78)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
38%
(
29 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
78)
84
Total Points Won
71
|
4-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Samuele Pieri
Player
Dusan Obradovic
66%
(
61 of
93)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
73)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
42%
(
39 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
38 of
73)
92
Total Points Won
74
|
2-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Nerman Fatic
Player
Dusan Obradovic
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
31
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Akira Santillan
Player
Dusan Obradovic
77%
(
55 of
71)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
16%
(
3 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
45%
(
32 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Dusan Obradovic
Player
John Sperle
65%
(
55 of
84)
1st Serve %
66%
(
46 of
70)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
18 of
46)
34%
(
10 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
48%
(
40 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
39 of
70)
83
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Dusan Obradovic
Player
Alessandro Battiston
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve %
58%
(
28 of
48)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
17 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Dusan Obradovic
Player
Antoni Fabre
56%
(
54 of
97)
1st Serve %
67%
(
56 of
83)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
49%
(
21 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
46%
(
45 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
83)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
7-6(4) 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Martin Klizan
Player
Dusan Obradovic
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
65%
(
30 of
46)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Martin Klizan
Player
Dusan Obradovic
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve %
63%
(
25 of
40)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
53
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Dusan Obradovic
Player
William Bartram
54%
(
25 of
46)
1st Serve %
63%
(
37 of
59)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Maxence Bertimon
Player
Dusan Obradovic
63%
(
68 of
108)
1st Serve %
63%
(
68 of
108)
4
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
3
69%
(
47 of
68)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
41 of
68)
43%
(
17 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
41%
(
44 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
108)
111
Total Points Won
105
|
4-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H |
view more
View full predicted draw for Fatic