Nerman Fatic vs Dusan Lajovic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan

Form
L W W W W W W L W L
Form
L W W W W L W W L LHead-To-Head: Fatic 1 - 0 Lajovic
They have played 2 sets in total, with Fatic winning 2 and Lajovic winning 0. The last match between Fatic and Lajovic was at the Perugia Challenger, 11-06-2025, Round: Second, Surface: Clay, with Nerman Fatic getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Nerman Fatic | 1 |
Dusan Lajovic | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Perugia Challenger(11-06-2025)
Fatic | Stats | Lajovic |
---|---|---|
79% (34-9) | YTD Win/Loss | 51% (24-23) |
1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
239 | Ranking | 118 |
191 | Highest Rank | 23 |
30 | Age | 35 |
R | Plays | R |
11 | Titles | 14 |
58% (391-278) | Career Total W/L | 54% (541-467) |
$73,995 | Career Prize Money | $4,963,415 |
2 | YTD Titles | 0 |
1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Bernet VS Popko PREDICTION Clay
EFG Swiss Open - Gstaad atp
12 Jul 2025 / Q1 round
Passaro VS Brunold PREDICTION Clay
EFG Swiss Open - Gstaad atp
12 Jul 2025 / Q1 round
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 6-4 |
![]() ![]()
Nerman Fatic
Player
Dusan Lajovic
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
70%
(
38 of
54)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
28 of
38)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
21 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
47
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
12 | Games Won | 6 |
2 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
0 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
1:25:44 | Average Match Time | 1:25:44 |
72% (38/53) | 1st Serve % | 70% (38/54) |
82% (31/38) | 1st Serve Win % | 74% (28/38) |
53% (8/15) | 2nd Serve Win % | 31% (5/16) |
75% (3/4) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/2) |
39% (21/54) | Return Points Win % | 26% (14/53) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Fatic vs Lajovic Match Preview :
- Fatic has a slightly lower success rate on second serve points, winning 41.68% compared to Lajovic's 44.33%. Could this indicate an edge for Lajovic? It suggests he might hold a slight advantage in serving under pressure.
- In terms of returning, Fatic wins 43.64% of their opponent's second serve points, slightly edging out Lajovic's 42.42%. However, on first serve returns, Fatic stands at 30.29% compared to Lajovic's 27.51%, giving him a notable edge.
- Saving breakpoints is critical in matches. Fatic saves 52.15% of these opportunities, while Lajovic saves 55.42%. Does this make Lajovic better under pressure? It could mean he has the resilience advantage.
- Overall, Fatic has a stronger match-winning record over the past year, achieving a 69.35% win rate, whereas Lajovic's is at 43.14%. Could Fatic's consistency be the key to victory?
- Both players excel on clay, with Fatic holding a 61% win rate and Lajovic close behind at 59%. This suggests a balanced face-off on their preferred surface.
- Fatic frequently competes at Challengers/ITF level and has won 58.06% of matches, while Lajovic primarily competes at the Main tour level, winning 40%. This difference might influence their competitive edge.
- In terms of competition level, Fatic's opponents have an average rank of 351.02, while Lajovic's are ranked at 101.65 on average. Does this indicate Lajovic is more battle-tested?
- When it comes to deciding sets, Fatic wins 68% of the time, considerably higher than Lajovic's 38%. This could sway momentum if the match reaches a crucial final set.
- Break point conversion is another area where Fatic excels, converting 38.3% compared to Lajovic's 32.73%. This can be a decisive factor in tight matches.
Editorial Prediction (June 10, 2025, UTC):
Both players show competence on clay, with Fatic slightly outperforming Lajovic in win percentages. Although their second serve stats are close, Fatic's superior return game and break point conversion provide him with a marked advantage.
Lajovic holds an edge in high-pressure situations, indicated by a better breakpoint save percentage. However, Fatic's ability to win deciding sets and overall stronger match-winning record suggest resilience and consistency in prolonged games.
While Lajovic has faced tougher opponents, Fatic's higher performance in recent metrics gives him the upper hand. Factoring in all these elements, Fatic seems poised as the more likely winner in this match.
Fatic vs Lajovic Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Nerman Fatic Recent Matches Played
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
Player
Nerman Fatic
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve %
69%
(
36 of
52)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
11 of
16)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
21 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Nerman Fatic
Player
Roman Andres Burruchaga
64%
(
67 of
104)
1st Serve %
62%
(
64 of
103)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
49 of
67)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
39 of
64)
38%
(
14 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
39%
(
41 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
45 of
103)
108
Total Points Won
99
|
4-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
F |
![]() ![]()
Andrea Pellegrino
Player
Nerman Fatic
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve %
81%
(
51 of
63)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Nerman Fatic
Player
Pierluigi Basile
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve %
50%
(
32 of
64)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
27 of
32)
69%
(
18 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
25%
(
18 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
21 of
64)
75
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Nerman Fatic
Player
Dalibor Svrcina
71%
(
54 of
76)
1st Serve %
71%
(
54 of
76)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
32 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
35 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Nerman Fatic
Player
Dusan Lajovic
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
70%
(
38 of
54)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
28 of
38)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
21 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Nerman Fatic
Player
Oriol Roca Batalla
64%
(
91 of
143)
1st Serve %
65%
(
71 of
109)
5
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
60%
(
55 of
91)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
52 of
71)
58%
(
30 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
41%
(
58 of
143)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
39 of
109)
124
Total Points Won
128
|
2-6 7-6(5) 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Nerman Fatic
Player
Andrea Picchione
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
56
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Dusan Lajovic Recent Matches Played
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Billy Harris
Player
Dusan Lajovic
71%
(
66 of
93)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
75)
8
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
34%
(
32 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
75)
93
Total Points Won
75
|
6-3 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Arthur Cazaux
Player
Dusan Lajovic
69%
(
80 of
116)
1st Serve %
74%
(
96 of
130)
12
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
75%
(
60 of
80)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
56 of
96)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
31%
(
36 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
55 of
130)
135
Total Points Won
111
|
6-7(6) 6-2 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
![]() ![]()
Dusan Lajovic
Player
Arthur Bouquier
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
2
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
7
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Dusan Lajovic
Player
Liam Draxl
70%
(
51 of
73)
1st Serve %
71%
(
63 of
89)
7
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
41 of
63)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
33%
(
24 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
89)
87
Total Points Won
75
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
F |
![]() ![]()
Carlos Taberner
Player
Dusan Lajovic
61%
(
55 of
90)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
40%
(
36 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
86
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Dusan Lajovic
Player
Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve %
80%
(
41 of
51)
7
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Dusan Lajovic
Player
Francesco Maestrelli
75%
(
60 of
80)
1st Serve %
52%
(
39 of
75)
2
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
30 of
39)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
27 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
75)
82
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Dusan Lajovic
Player
Albert Ramos-Vinolas
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve %
50%
(
26 of
52)
7
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
23 of
52)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H |
view more

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
58% (391/278) | Win/Loss | 54% (541/467) |
57% (863/639) | Sets Win/Loss | 53% (1290/1156) |
53% (7354/6529) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (12021/11565) |
51% (41/40) | Hard Win/Loss | 49% (116/120) |
61% (331/212) | Clay Win/Loss | 59% (348/242) |
44% (19/24) | Indoor Hard W/L | 47% (69/78) |
0% (0/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 23% (8/27) |
0.22 | Aces Per Game | 0.26 |
1493 | Aces Total | 3044 |
0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.12 |
1472 | Total Double Faults | 1424 |
1:19:42 | Average Match Time | 1:22:9 |
508.06 | Average Opponent Rank | 474.53 |
67% (22970/34460) | 1st Serve % | 66% (40994/62452) |
65% (15000/22970) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (28026/40994) |
48% (5503/11490) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (11255/21458) |
47% (1895/4061) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (2269/5685) |
43% (15057/34806) | Return Points Win % | 38% (23498/62444) |
20% (1/4) | Slam W/L | 39% (35/54) |
0% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 51% (82/78) |
44% (4/5) | Cups W/L | 47% (18/20) |
25% (3/9) | Main Tour W/L | 49% (176/185) |
53% (112/99) | Challenger W/L | 64% (140/78) |
63% (271/160) | Futures W/L | 64% (90/51) |
59% (382/643) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (497/902) |
0% (0/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 38% (34/90) |
52% (79/151) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (171/345) |
54% (99/184) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (159/312) |
88% (383/338) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (571/475) |
11% (383/41) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (571/95) |
19% (286/54) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (437/62) |
Fatic vs. Lajovic Prediction Form Trend:

Other Predictions
- Loading news...