Prediction of Nerman Fatic vs Daniel Michalski Head-to-Head, Best Odds & Picks At Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
57% (351-269)
Career Total W/L
63% (239-143)
41% (18-26)
YTD W/L
60% (39-26)
$73,995
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
2
Recent Form Stats
Nerman Fatic vs Daniel Michalski Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Fatic 1 - 1 Michalski
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Fatic has won 48.34% of points on their second serve, while Michalski has won 48.5%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Fatic, in recent form, has won 48.64% of their opponent's second serve points, while Michalski has won 56.38%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.25% and 40.46% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Fatic has saved 58.62% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Michalski has saved 55.56% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Fatic has won 44% of matches played (W/L 22/ 28), with Michalski winning 59.09% (W/L 39/ 27) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Fatic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 291/ 203), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Michalski has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 206/ 107), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 45% (W/L 5/ 6).
- Player level: In the last year, Fatic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 36.67% of matches (W/L 11/ 19), where as Michalski has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 71.43% of matches (W/L 25/ 10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Fatic winning 1 times and Michalski being victorious 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Fatic winning 2 and Michalski winning 3. The last match between Fatic and Michalski was at the M25 Santa Margherita di Pula, 15-10-2024, First, Clay with Nerman Fatic getting the victory 7-6(5) 0-6 6-0.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:18:3.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Fatic and Michalski have played a deciding set 1 times, with Fatic winning 1 times and Michalski 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Fatic winning 1, and Michalski 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Fatic has played against opponents with an average rank of 307.18 while Michalski has played against players with an average rank of 454.27.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Fatic has won 29% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Michalski has won 52% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Fatic has converted 39.76% of breakpoint opportunities, and Michalski has converted 52.45% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Nerman Fatic vs Daniel Michalski For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
stats | Nerman Fatic | Daniel Michalski |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
Sets Won | 2 | 3 |
Games Won | 19 | 25 |
Aces (Total) | 3 | 3 |
DFs Total | 9 | 3 |
Avg Match Time | 2:18:3 | 2:18:3 |
1st Serve % | 64% (98/153) | 69% (99/143) |
1st Serve Win% | 62% (61/98) | 63% (62/99) |
2nd Serve Win% | 35% (19/55) | 55% (24/44) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (6/12) | 41% (9/22) |
Return Points W% | 40% (57/143) | 48% (73/153) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-6(5) 0-6 6-0 |
Nerman Fatic
Player
Daniel Michalski
64%
(
62 of
97)
1st Serve %
73%
(
61 of
84)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
34%
(
12 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
45%
(
44 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
84)
89
Total Points Won
92
|
||||
7-5 6-1 |
Daniel Michalski
Player
Nerman Fatic
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Nerman Fatic | Daniel Michalski |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 41% (18/26) | 60% (39/26) |
Sets Win/Loss | 46% (46/55) | 58% (88/63) |
Games Win/Loss | 48% (467/512) | 54% (737/633) |
Hard Win/Loss | 38% (3/5) | 14% (1/6) |
Clay Win/Loss | 41% (14/20) | 65% (36/19) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 100% (1/0) | 67% (2/1) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.4 | 0.16 |
Aces Total | 189 | 108 |
DFs per game | 0.2 | 0.23 |
DFs Total | 94 | 153 |
Avg Match Time | 1:44:9 | 1:58:59 |
Avg Opp Rank | 283.55 | 454.57 |
1st Serve % | 62% (1816/2915) | 60% (2679/4471) |
1st Serve W% | 69% (1247/1816) | 66% (1756/2679) |
2nd Serve W% | 48% (530/1099) | 50% (894/1792) |
BPs Won% Total | 38% (95/250) | 50% (250/498) |
Return Pts W% | 37% (1100/2971) | 44% (1963/4427) |
Slam W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 38% (11/18) | 45% (14/17) |
Futures W/L | 67% (4/2) | 74% (25/9) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 40% (17/42) | 60% (39/65) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 53% (9/17) | 65% (11/17) |
Deciding Set W% | 23% (3/13) | 52% (11/21) |
1st set W, W | 81% (21/17) | 87% (38/33) |
1st set W, L | 19% (21/4) | 13% (38/5) |
1st set L, W | 4% (23/1) | 22% (27/6) |
Nerman Fatic Recent Matches Played
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Mariano Tammaro
Player
Nerman Fatic
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
58
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 5-2 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Nerman Fatic
Player
Daniel Michalski
64%
(
62 of
97)
1st Serve %
73%
(
61 of
84)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
34%
(
12 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
45%
(
44 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
84)
89
Total Points Won
92
|
7-6(5) 0-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
SF |
Jay Clarke
Player
Nerman Fatic
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Nerman Fatic
Player
Lorenzo Giustino
53%
(
37 of
70)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
77)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
7
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
64%
(
21 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
24 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
77)
80
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(8) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Nerman Fatic
Player
Martin Krumich
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve %
47%
(
31 of
66)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
26 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
78
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Nerman Fatic
Player
Marcello Serafini
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
7
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
41%
(
18 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
35 of
60)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Valentin Royer
Player
Nerman Fatic
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve %
47%
(
25 of
53)
1
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
3
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
20 of
25)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
15 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
20 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Alibek Kachmazov
Player
Nerman Fatic
51%
(
36 of
71)
1st Serve %
60%
(
44 of
73)
10
Aces
16
4
Double Faults
4
86%
(
31 of
36)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
32 of
44)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
21 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
28 of
73)
78
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Joel Schwaerzler
Player
Nerman Fatic
53%
(
42 of
80)
1st Serve %
56%
(
53 of
95)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
38 of
53)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
38%
(
30 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
95)
89
Total Points Won
86
|
7-5 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Gustavo Heide
Player
Nerman Fatic
58%
(
65 of
112)
1st Serve %
63%
(
67 of
106)
4
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
2
75%
(
49 of
65)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
45 of
67)
40%
(
19 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
39%
(
44 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
106)
115
Total Points Won
103
|
6-2 5-7 7-6(5) | H2H |
view more
Daniel Michalski Recent Matches Played
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Joaquin Aguilar Cardozo
Player
Daniel Michalski
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve %
56%
(
14 of
25)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
68%
(
15 of
22)
1st Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
43%
(
15 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
18 of
25)
38
Total Points Won
22
|
6-1 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Daniel Michalski
Player
Gabriele Vulpitta
53%
(
30 of
57)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
69)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
38 of
69)
73
Total Points Won
53
|
6-0 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Nerman Fatic
Player
Daniel Michalski
64%
(
62 of
97)
1st Serve %
73%
(
61 of
84)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
34%
(
12 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
45%
(
44 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
84)
89
Total Points Won
92
|
7-6(5) 0-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
QF |
Andrea Picchione
Player
Daniel Michalski
59%
(
40 of
68)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
44%
(
30 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
59
|
1-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Daniel Michalski
Player
Giovanni Oradini
52%
(
26 of
50)
1st Serve %
57%
(
33 of
58)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Daniel Michalski
Player
Federico Iannaccone
50%
(
21 of
42)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
F |
Daniel Michalski
Player
Niccolo Catini
45%
(
31 of
69)
1st Serve %
71%
(
34 of
48)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
42%
(
29 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
SF |
Daniel Michalski
Player
Gabriele Pennaforti
58%
(
53 of
92)
1st Serve %
52%
(
49 of
95)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
42%
(
39 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
43 of
95)
96
Total Points Won
91
|
7-5 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Daniel Michalski
Player
Lorenzo Carboni
54%
(
28 of
52)
1st Serve %
58%
(
22 of
38)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
1
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
57
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Daniel Michalski
Player
Carlo Alberto Caniato
54%
(
51 of
95)
1st Serve %
58%
(
60 of
104)
2
Aces
4
8
Double Faults
4
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
50%
(
22 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
40%
(
38 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
46 of
104)
103
Total Points Won
96
|
5-7 7-5 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Free Tennis Predictions For Today's Matches
A few tennis predictions for upcoming lower level events head to head tennis matches are below. If you want to get access to the best matches that will win you the most, subscribe to our tennis predictions plan for a low monthly fee and get full access to all our expert picks with full odds analysis and value bets.