Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Matchstat.com expert prediction for the Fatic Dzumhur H2H. Here is our in-depth stats analysis and accurate prediction of the Fatic Dzumhur head to head.
Full Stats Used To Calculate Our Fatic Vs Dzumhur Prediction Are Further Down This Page. Here Is A Brief Snapshot
The best career year for Fatic was 2019 when he won 72% of matches played on all surfaces (46/18). Dzumhur was in the best form in 2013 when he had victories of 68% of his matches (53/25). In their last event played, Dzumhur made the Second round at Danderyd Challenger, whereas Fatic played Maspalomas Challenger and made the First round.
217
Rank
191
High
29
Age
R
Plays
3
Total1
0
Hard0
3
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
154
Rank
23
High
31
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
Form
W
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
58% (333-243)
Career Total W/L
58% (514-367)
56% (36-28)
YTD W/L
55% (41-34)
$5,890
Career Prize Money
$2,553,988
1
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Nerman Fatic | Damir Dzumhur |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 3 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 6 | 3 |
| Games Won | 45 | 36 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 8 | 9 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:57:1 | 1:57:1 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (170/271) | 74% (221/299) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 61% (104/170) | 56% (124/221) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (50/101) | 49% (38/78) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 39% (16/41) | 37% (11/30) |
| Return Points W% | 46% (137/299) | 43% (117/271) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 75% (3/4) | 25% (1/4) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (3/3) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (3/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (3/0) |
Recent Form Is Very Important In Predicting An Upcoming H2H. Recent Matches With Stats…
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-4 |
Stats 
Nerman Fatic
Player
Damir Dzumhur
55%
(
36 of
66)
1st Serve %
72%
(
41 of
57)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
67%
(
20 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
38%
(
25 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
||||
| 6-4 3-6 6-4 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Damir Dzumhur
67%
(
66 of
99)
1st Serve %
78%
(
73 of
94)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
58%
(
38 of
66)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
39 of
73)
39%
(
13 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
48%
(
48 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
45 of
94)
96
Total Points Won
97
|
||||
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Damir Dzumhur
49%
(
26 of
53)
1st Serve %
78%
(
60 of
77)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
37 of
77)
69
Total Points Won
61
|
||||
| 7-5 2-1 ret. |
Stats
Damir Dzumhur
Player
Nerman Fatic
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve %
79%
(
42 of
53)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
38%
(
27 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
67
Total Points Won
57
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Nerman Fatic | Damir Dzumhur |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 56% (36/28) | 55% (41/34) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 56% (81/64) | 54% (90/78) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (720/647) | 51% (822/783) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 75% (15/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 58% (34/25) | 50% (18/18) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (2/2) | 44% (8/10) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Aces pg | 0.36 | 0.11 |
| Aces Total | 241 | 90 |
| DFs per game | 0.26 | 0.22 |
| DFs Total | 175 | 170 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:47:8 | 1:44:54 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 252.11 | 268.29 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (2831/4472) | 68% (3603/5281) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (1915/2831) | 62% (2224/3603) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (808/1641) | 49% (824/1678) |
| BPs Won% Total | 46% (203/437) | 42% (274/649) |
| Return Pts W% | 41% (1730/4263) | 44% (2389/5442) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 20% (1/4) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/3) |
| Main Tour W/L | 25% (1/3) | 47% (7/8) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 57% (26/20) | 63% (33/19) |
| Futures W/L | 75% (9/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 58% (34/59) | 54% (39/72) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 56% (9/16) | 60% (12/20) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (11/22) | 52% (12/23) |
| 1st set W, W | 82% (38/31) | 92% (39/36) |
| 1st set W, L | 16% (38/6) | 8% (39/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 15% (26/4) | 11% (35/4) |
Nerman Fatic Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Svyatoslav Gulin
Player
Nerman Fatic
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
38%
(
15 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
55
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 3-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Alexander Weis
67%
(
80 of
119)
1st Serve %
70%
(
87 of
124)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
4
66%
(
53 of
80)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
50 of
87)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
40%
(
48 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
54 of
124)
125
Total Points Won
118
|
5-7 7-6(10) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Jay Clarke
Player
Nerman Fatic
59%
(
44 of
74)
1st Serve %
70%
(
58 of
83)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
41 of
83)
86
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Yanaki Milev
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve %
55%
(
22 of
40)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
41%
(
27 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
67
Total Points Won
39
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Sarp Agabigun
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
81)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
81)
78
Total Points Won
66
|
6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Jonas Forejtek
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve %
46%
(
29 of
63)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
21 of
29)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
27 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Vitaliy Sachko
Player
Nerman Fatic
66%
(
73 of
110)
1st Serve %
59%
(
69 of
117)
12
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
5
71%
(
52 of
73)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
54 of
69)
59%
(
22 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
33%
(
36 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
42 of
117)
116
Total Points Won
111
|
6-7(2) 6-3 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Yanaki Milev
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
55%
(
28 of
51)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
9 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lukas Klein
Player
Nerman Fatic
65%
(
58 of
89)
1st Serve %
62%
(
67 of
108)
9
Aces
14
3
Double Faults
4
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
49 of
67)
71%
(
22 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
27 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
40 of
108)
102
Total Points Won
95
|
6-7(0) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Marius Copil
68%
(
48 of
71)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
16
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
3
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
22 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
23 of
65)
72
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Damir Dzumhur Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Maxime Cressy
Player
Damir Dzumhur
57%
(
63 of
111)
1st Serve %
71%
(
89 of
126)
18
Aces
2
11
Double Faults
2
76%
(
48 of
63)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
54 of
89)
56%
(
27 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
18%
(
3 of
17)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
32%
(
36 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
50 of
126)
125
Total Points Won
112
|
6-3 6-7(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Damir Dzumhur
Player
Elmer Moller
58%
(
34 of
59)
1st Serve %
43%
(
22 of
51)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Arthur Rinderknech
Player
Damir Dzumhur
69%
(
49 of
71)
1st Serve %
62%
(
41 of
66)
11
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
80%
(
39 of
49)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
22 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
27 of
66)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Damir Dzumhur
Player
Leandro Riedi
65%
(
57 of
88)
1st Serve %
47%
(
54 of
114)
2
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
14
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
37 of
54)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
25 of
60)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
38%
(
33 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
52 of
114)
107
Total Points Won
95
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lukas Klein
Player
Damir Dzumhur
75%
(
73 of
97)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
8
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
2
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
35 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
22 of
59)
84
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Andrea Vavassori
Player
Damir Dzumhur
68%
(
63 of
93)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
75)
7
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
5
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
33%
(
10 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
44%
(
41 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
87
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(8) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Otto Virtanen
Player
Damir Dzumhur
50%
(
62 of
123)
1st Serve %
57%
(
68 of
119)
9
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
46 of
68)
52%
(
32 of
61)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
40%
(
49 of
123)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
49 of
119)
123
Total Points Won
119
|
6-4 6-7(2) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Luca Nardi
Player
Damir Dzumhur
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve %
54%
(
25 of
46)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
64
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Damir Dzumhur
Player
Zsombor Piros
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Damir Dzumhur
Player
Giulio Zeppieri
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve %
57%
(
20 of
35)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
17%
(
6 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
51
Total Points Won
19
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Fatic Vs Dzumhur Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
