Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Natsumi Kawaguchi vs Emma Navarro Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kawaguchi vs Navarro analysis and find out who is favored!
Natsumi Kawaguchi vs Emma Navarro Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kawaguchi has won 41.49% of points on his second serve, while Navarro has won 48.81%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kawaguchi, in recent form, has won 52.6% of his opponent's second serve points, while Navarro has won 58.21%. The same stats for first serve returns are 39.33% and 41.12% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kawaguchi has saved 47.93% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Navarro has saved 56.35% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kawaguchi has won 48.72% of matches played (W/L 19/ 20), with Navarro winning 73.96% (W/L 71/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kawaguchi has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 63% (W/L 5/ 3), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Navarro has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 73% (W/L 8/ 3), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 59/ 43).
- Player level: In the last year, Kawaguchi has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 40% of matches (W/L 12/ 18), where as Navarro has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 83.78% of matches (W/L 31/ 6). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kawaguchi has played against opponents with an average rank of 189.41 while Navarro has played against players with an average rank of 173.1.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kawaguchi has won 33% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Navarro has won 67% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kawaguchi has converted 42.98% of breakpoint opportunities, and Navarro has converted 46.77% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Kawaguchi 0 - 0 Navarro
395
Rank
346
High
21
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
21
Rank
20
High
22
Age
Plays
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
Form
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
61% (78-49)
Career Total W/L
64% (172-97)
33% (2-4)
YTD W/L
73% (22-8)
$8,310
Career Prize Money
$964,525
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Natsumi Kawaguchi | Emma Navarro |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 33% (2/4) | 73% (22/8) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 40% (6/9) | 62% (48/29) |
| Games Win/Loss | 46% (60/71) | 55% (387/320) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 33% (2/4) | 75% (21/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.06 | 0.11 |
| Aces Total | 4 | 39 |
| DFs per game | 0.19 | 0.15 |
| DFs Total | 12 | 53 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:48:40 | 1:50:50 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 95.23 |
| 1st Serve % | 72% (294/409) | 67% (1533/2303) |
| 1st Serve W% | 58% (171/294) | 63% (965/1533) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 37% (43/115) | 48% (370/770) |
| BPs Won% Total | 44% (24/54) | 46% (142/311) |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (199/439) | 46% (1108/2414) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (8/4) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 79% (11/3) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 33% (2/6) | 73% (22/30) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 33% (1/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (1/3) | 76% (13/17) |
| 1st set W, W | 67% (3/2) | 94% (16/15) |
| 1st set W, L | 33% (3/1) | 6% (16/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (3/0) | 50% (14/7) |
Natsumi Kawaguchi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Sara Saito
Player
Natsumi Kawaguchi
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
74%
(
32 of
43)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Miho Kuramochi
Player
Natsumi Kawaguchi
80%
(
43 of
54)
1st Serve %
72%
(
49 of
68)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ikumi Yamazaki
Player
Natsumi Kawaguchi
69%
(
62 of
90)
1st Serve %
72%
(
55 of
76)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
43%
(
39 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
76)
84
Total Points Won
82
|
6-4 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Natsumi Kawaguchi
Player
Risako Togashi
83%
(
40 of
48)
1st Serve %
73%
(
32 of
44)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
58%
(
23 of
40)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
10 of
32)
25%
(
2 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
48%
(
23 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
56
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kayo Nishimura
Player
Natsumi Kawaguchi
80%
(
51 of
64)
1st Serve %
68%
(
42 of
62)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
31%
(
4 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
26 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
2-6 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Natsumi Kawaguchi
Player
Mio Mushika
68%
(
76 of
112)
1st Serve %
47%
(
57 of
122)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
11
63%
(
48 of
76)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
27 of
65)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
44%
(
49 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
60 of
122)
123
Total Points Won
111
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mai Hontama
Player
Natsumi Kawaguchi
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
71)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
22 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
37 of
71)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Natsumi Kawaguchi
Player
En Shuo Liang
60%
(
53 of
89)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
5
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
38%
(
34 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
72)
85
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Luksika Kumkhum
Player
Natsumi Kawaguchi
69%
(
66 of
96)
1st Serve %
71%
(
73 of
103)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
5
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
43 of
73)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
45%
(
43 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
48 of
103)
101
Total Points Won
98
|
6-3 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Natsumi Kawaguchi
Player
Rinon Okuwaki
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve %
72%
(
41 of
57)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
5
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
24 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Emma Navarro Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Emma Navarro
Player
Hanne Vandewinkel
65%
(
65 of
100)
1st Serve %
58%
(
60 of
103)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
9
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
38%
(
38 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
45 of
103)
107
Total Points Won
96
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Jaqueline Cristian
Player
Emma Navarro
58%
(
50 of
86)
1st Serve %
68%
(
73 of
108)
3
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
2
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
43 of
73)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
30 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
49 of
108)
105
Total Points Won
89
|
6-3 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emma Navarro
Player
Katie Volynets
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve %
76%
(
48 of
63)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
65
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Jessica Pegula
Player
Emma Navarro
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
13 of
20)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
28 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
24 of
60)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Emma Navarro
Player
Jasmine Paolini
70%
(
51 of
73)
1st Serve %
63%
(
56 of
89)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
37%
(
7 of
19)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
47 of
89)
91
Total Points Won
71
|
6-2 3-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emma Navarro
Player
Storm Hunter
70%
(
47 of
67)
1st Serve %
65%
(
44 of
68)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
28 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maria Sakkari
Player
Emma Navarro
60%
(
75 of
125)
1st Serve %
67%
(
78 of
117)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
71%
(
53 of
75)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
46 of
78)
44%
(
22 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
40%
(
50 of
125)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
52 of
117)
127
Total Points Won
115
|
5-7 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Emma Navarro
Player
Aryna Sabalenka
60%
(
54 of
90)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
73)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
35 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
28 of
73)
83
Total Points Won
80
|
6-3 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Emma Navarro
Player
Elina Svitolina
71%
(
59 of
83)
1st Serve %
57%
(
50 of
88)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
58%
(
34 of
59)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
42%
(
35 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
44 of
88)
92
Total Points Won
79
|
6-1 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emma Navarro
Player
Lesya Tsurenko
63%
(
67 of
107)
1st Serve %
70%
(
71 of
101)
0
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
8
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
28%
(
11 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
60%
(
9 of
15)
Break Points Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
49%
(
52 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
51 of
101)
106
Total Points Won
102
|
4-6 7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Kawaguchi Vs Navarro Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
