Nathaniel Lammons vs Lance Amaury LAGE Castelan Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Lammons vs Castelan analysis and find out who is favored!
Nathaniel Lammons vs Lance Amaury LAGE Castelan Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Lammons has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Castelan has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Lammons, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Castelan has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Lammons has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Castelan has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Lammons has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Castelan winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Lammons has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 50/ 32), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Castelan has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Lammons has played against opponents with an average rank of while Castelan has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Lammons has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Castelan has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Lammons has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Castelan has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Lammons 0 - 0 Castelan
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
30
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Nathaniel Lammons | Lance Amaury LAGE Castelan |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Aces pg | 0 | 1st Match |
Aces Total | 0 | 1st Match |
DFs per game | 0 | 1st Match |
DFs Total | 0 | 1st Match |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 1st Match |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Nathaniel Lammons Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Gijs Brouwer
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve %
68%
(
30 of
44)
1
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
92%
(
23 of
25)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
13%
(
4 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
53
Total Points Won
23
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Mats Rosenkranz
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
62%
(
58 of
94)
1st Serve %
63%
(
61 of
97)
18
Aces
15
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
48 of
58)
1st Serve Won
85%
(
52 of
61)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
31%
(
29 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
32 of
97)
97
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 4-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Nicola Kuhn
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
6
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Borna Gojo
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
70%
(
87 of
124)
1st Serve %
66%
(
71 of
107)
20
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
0
78%
(
68 of
87)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
52 of
71)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
37 of
124)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
32 of
107)
119
Total Points Won
112
|
7-6(2) 6-7(9) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Denis Istomin
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
66%
(
60 of
91)
1st Serve %
67%
(
54 of
81)
5
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
41 of
54)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
31%
(
28 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
28 of
81)
91
Total Points Won
81
|
6-3 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Nathaniel Lammons
Player
Vladyslav Orlov
83%
(
43 of
52)
1st Serve %
74%
(
54 of
73)
12
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
73)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Nathaniel Lammons
Player
Maxime Hamou
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
58%
(
25 of
43)
12
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
20 of
25)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
16 of
43)
55
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Ruan Roelofse
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve %
44%
(
24 of
54)
8
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
4
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
96%
(
23 of
24)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
19 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Ricardo Rodriguez-Pace
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
55%
(
28 of
51)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Julian Lenz
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
72%
(
58 of
81)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
74)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
74%
(
17 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
22 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
25 of
74)
84
Total Points Won
71
|
4-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Lance Amaury LAGE Castelan Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 5-7 7-5 10-8 | H2H | |||
QF |
Isaac Nortie Nortey
Player
Lance Amaury Lage Castelan
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
65%
(
42 of
65)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
64
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 | 5-7 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-7(2) 6-4 13-11 | H2H | |||
R2 |
Ricardo Rodriguez-Pace
Player
Lance Amaury Lage Castelan
75%
(
48 of
64)
1st Serve %
66%
(
51 of
77)
7
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
4
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
30%
(
19 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
77)
78
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Lance Amaury Lage Castelan
Player
Ismael Batista Mascorro
82%
(
64 of
78)
1st Serve %
55%
(
44 of
80)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
34 of
44)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
24 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
29 of
80)
83
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(4) 7-6(4) | H2H |
view more