Nathaniel Lammons vs Kalman L. Boyd Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Lammons vs Boyd analysis and find out who is favored!
Nathaniel Lammons vs Kalman L. Boyd Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Lammons has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Boyd has won 48.78%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Lammons, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Boyd has won 51.35%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 33.98% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Lammons has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Boyd has saved 53.7% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Lammons has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Boyd winning 67.21% (W/L 41/ 20) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Lammons has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 50/ 32), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Boyd has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 85/ 59), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 7/ 5).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Lammons winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Lammons winning 2 and Boyd winning 0. The last match between Lammons and Boyd was at the USA F23, 27-06-2016, Q3, Hard with Nathaniel Lammons getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Lammons and Boyd have played a deciding set 0 times, with Lammons winning 0 times and Boyd 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Lammons winning 0, and Boyd 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Lammons has played against opponents with an average rank of while Boyd has played against players with an average rank of 82.38.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Lammons has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Boyd has won 53% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Lammons has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Boyd has converted 40% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Lammons 1 - 0 Boyd
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Ret.
Rank
591
High
30
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
26
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
54% (78-67)
Career Total W/L
59% (92-64)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Nathaniel Lammons | Kalman L. Boyd |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 3 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 6-1 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Nathaniel Lammons | Kalman L. Boyd |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Nathaniel Lammons Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Gijs Brouwer
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve %
68%
(
30 of
44)
1
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
92%
(
23 of
25)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
13%
(
4 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
53
Total Points Won
23
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Mats Rosenkranz
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
62%
(
58 of
94)
1st Serve %
63%
(
61 of
97)
18
Aces
15
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
48 of
58)
1st Serve Won
85%
(
52 of
61)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
31%
(
29 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
32 of
97)
97
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 4-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Nicola Kuhn
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
6
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Borna Gojo
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
70%
(
87 of
124)
1st Serve %
66%
(
71 of
107)
20
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
0
78%
(
68 of
87)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
52 of
71)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
37 of
124)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
32 of
107)
119
Total Points Won
112
|
7-6(2) 6-7(9) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Denis Istomin
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
66%
(
60 of
91)
1st Serve %
67%
(
54 of
81)
5
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
41 of
54)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
31%
(
28 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
28 of
81)
91
Total Points Won
81
|
6-3 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Nathaniel Lammons
Player
Vladyslav Orlov
83%
(
43 of
52)
1st Serve %
74%
(
54 of
73)
12
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
73)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Nathaniel Lammons
Player
Maxime Hamou
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
58%
(
25 of
43)
12
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
20 of
25)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
16 of
43)
55
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Ruan Roelofse
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve %
44%
(
24 of
54)
8
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
4
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
96%
(
23 of
24)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
19 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Ricardo Rodriguez-Pace
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
55%
(
28 of
51)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Julian Lenz
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
72%
(
58 of
81)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
74)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
74%
(
17 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
22 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
25 of
74)
84
Total Points Won
71
|
4-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Kalman L. Boyd Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
John Sperle
Player
Kalman L. Boyd
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve %
71%
(
59 of
83)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
83)
78
Total Points Won
65
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-1 4-6 10-3 | H2H | |||
Q2 |
Kalman L. Boyd
Player
Kirill Kolganov
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
47%
(
30 of
64)
6
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
2
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
22 of
30)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
10 of
34)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
19 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
51
|
6-1 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jakub Paul
Player
Kalman L. Boyd
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
70%
(
35 of
50)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Kalman L. Boyd
Player
Leo Matthysen
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve %
67%
(
54 of
81)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
38 of
81)
80
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(7) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Nicolas Kobelt
Player
Kalman L. Boyd
58%
(
67 of
116)
1st Serve %
73%
(
66 of
90)
10
Aces
5
12
Double Faults
7
76%
(
51 of
67)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
44 of
66)
41%
(
20 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
39%
(
45 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
34 of
90)
105
Total Points Won
101
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Kalman L. Boyd
Player
Cayetano March
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
44
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
R2 |
Max Wiskandt
Player
Kalman L. Boyd
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve %
77%
(
68 of
88)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
40 of
68)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
88)
86
Total Points Won
72
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Kalman L. Boyd
Player
Egor Agafonov
71%
(
65 of
92)
1st Serve %
70%
(
57 of
82)
3
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
7
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
40 of
57)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
38 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
30 of
82)
84
Total Points Won
90
|
1-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H |
view more