Nathan Seateun vs Leopold Zima Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Seateun vs Zima analysis and find out who is favored!
Nathan Seateun vs Leopold Zima Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Seateun has won 48.05% of points on his second serve, while Zima has won 42.47%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Seateun, in recent form, has won 53.05% of his opponent's second serve points, while Zima has won 46.37%. The same stats for first serve returns are 38.36% and 27.57% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Seateun has saved 54.05% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Zima has saved 57.69% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Seateun has won 44% of matches played (W/L 11/ 14), with Zima winning 55.1% (W/L 27/ 22) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Seateun has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 55% (W/L 96/ 79), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 51% (W/L 38/ 37). Zima has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 53/ 33), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 55/ 52).
- Player level: In the last year, Seateun has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 44% of matches (W/L 11/ 14), where as Zima has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 56.25% of matches (W/L 27/ 21). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Seateun winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Seateun winning 2 and Zima winning 0. The last match between Seateun and Zima was at the M15 La Nucia, 09-03-2021, Q2 round, Clay with Nathan Seateun getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Seateun and Zima have played a deciding set 0 times, with Seateun winning 0 times and Zima 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Seateun winning 1, and Zima 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Seateun has played against opponents with an average rank of 113 while Zima has played against players with an average rank of 143.57.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Seateun has won 100% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Zima has won 60% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Seateun has converted 48.53% of breakpoint opportunities, and Zima has converted 48.86% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Seateun 1 - 0 Zima
1
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
1
Minor
891
Rank
666
High
26
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
895
Rank
774
High
23
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
53% (146-128)
Career Total W/L
56% (152-120)
57% (4-3)
YTD W/L
71% (12-5)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Nathan Seateun | Leopold Zima |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 13 | 9 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 7-6(4) |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Nathan Seateun | Leopold Zima |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 57% (4/3) | 71% (12/5) |
Sets Win/Loss | 50% (8/8) | 62% (24/15) |
Games Win/Loss | 51% (77/75) | 53% (204/180) |
Hard Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 71% (5/2) |
Clay Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 70% (7/3) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.15 | 0.31 |
Aces Total | 11 | 59 |
DFs per game | 0.12 | 0.1 |
DFs Total | 9 | 18 |
Avg Match Time | 1:25:8 | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 65 | 180.41 |
1st Serve % | 65% (235/361) | 70% (466/668) |
1st Serve W% | 64% (151/235) | 71% (333/466) |
2nd Serve W% | 50% (63/126) | 41% (83/202) |
BPs Won% Total | 42% (18/43) | 39% (19/49) |
Return Pts W% | 43% (167/391) | 34% (214/629) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 57% (4/3) | 71% (12/5) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 57% (4/7) | 71% (12/17) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (1/3) | 33% (2/6) |
Deciding Set W% | 100% (2/2) | 100% (5/5) |
1st set W, W | 100% (3/3) | 100% (11/11) |
1st set W, L | 0% (3/0) | 0% (11/0) |
1st set L, W | 25% (4/1) | 17% (6/1) |
Nathan Seateun Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
QF |
Corentin Denolly
Player
Nathan Seateun
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
8
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Nathan Seateun
Player
Marlon Vankan
69%
(
76 of
110)
1st Serve %
76%
(
87 of
114)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
62%
(
47 of
76)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
53 of
87)
68%
(
23 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
36%
(
40 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
48 of
114)
118
Total Points Won
106
|
6-7(3) 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Nathan Seateun
Player
Lucas Bouquet
68%
(
67 of
99)
1st Serve %
58%
(
55 of
95)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
76%
(
51 of
67)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
39 of
55)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
33 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
35 of
95)
101
Total Points Won
93
|
6-3 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
Toufik Sahtali
Player
Nathan Seateun
57%
(
51 of
89)
1st Serve %
69%
(
37 of
54)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
0
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
44%
(
39 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(1) 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Nathan Seateun
Player
Aymeric Bourne
54%
(
22 of
41)
1st Serve %
70%
(
31 of
44)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
77%
(
17 of
22)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
13 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
56
Total Points Won
29
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Stefanos Sakellaridis
Player
Nathan Seateun
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
20%
(
8 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF | 3-0 ret. | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Leopold Zima Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Keegan Smith
Player
Leopold Zima
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve %
67%
(
30 of
45)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
56
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Leopold Zima
Player
Gabriel Decamps
61%
(
63 of
104)
1st Serve %
56%
(
43 of
77)
11
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
75%
(
47 of
63)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
44%
(
18 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
38%
(
39 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
27 of
77)
92
Total Points Won
89
|
7-5 6-7(7) 10-8 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Florian Broska
Player
Leopold Zima
55%
(
38 of
69)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
33 of
45)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
69)
76
Total Points Won
62
|
6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
QF | 6-3 6-7(3) 10-3 | H2H | |||
Q2 |
Leopold Zima
Player
Mischa Lanz
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
29 of
69)
66
Total Points Won
59
|
2-6 6-2 10-5 | H2H |
view more