Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Nathan Ponwith vs Eduard Esteve Lobato Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ponwith vs Lobato analysis and find out who is favored!
Nathan Ponwith vs Eduard Esteve Lobato Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ponwith has won 53.6% of points on his second serve, while Lobato has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ponwith, in recent form, has won 46.94% of his opponent's second serve points, while Lobato has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.37% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ponwith has saved 56.33% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Lobato has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ponwith has won 30.61% of matches played (W/L 15/ 34), with Lobato winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ponwith has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 36/ 24), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 36% (W/L 8/ 14). Lobato has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 313/ 217), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Ponwith has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 21.88% of matches (W/L 7/ 25), where as Lobato has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Ponwith winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Ponwith winning 0 and Lobato winning 2. The last match between Ponwith and Lobato was at the M25 Weston, 27-01-2022, First, Clay with Eduard Esteve Lobato getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:11:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Ponwith and Lobato have played a deciding set 0 times, with Ponwith winning 0 times and Lobato 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Ponwith winning 0, and Lobato 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ponwith has played against opponents with an average rank of 199.04 while Lobato has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ponwith has won 42% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Lobato has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ponwith has converted 36.8% of breakpoint opportunities, and Lobato has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Ponwith 0 - 1 Lobato
744
Rank
367
High
26
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
841
Rank
271
High
29
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
Form
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
56% (166-132)
Career Total W/L
58% (332-241)
41% (7-10)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Nathan Ponwith | Eduard Esteve Lobato |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 4 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 8 | 5 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:11:0 | 1:11:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 49% (22/45) | 59% (26/44) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 64% (14/22) | 88% (23/26) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 48% (11/23) | 61% (11/18) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 67% (4/6) |
| Return Points W% | 23% (10/44) | 44% (20/45) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-1 |
Stats 
Eduard Esteve Lobato
Player
Nathan Ponwith
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
49%
(
22 of
45)
5
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
2
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
54
Total Points Won
35
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Nathan Ponwith | Eduard Esteve Lobato |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 41% (7/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 41% (16/23) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 47% (175/197) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 47% (7/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.21 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 39 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.33 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 60 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:52:25 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 269.71 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (710/1219) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 64% (454/710) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 54% (273/509) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 41% (39/95) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 38% (445/1174) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 29% (2/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 50% (5/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 41% (7/17) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 83% (5/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 60% (3/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 71% (7/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 29% (7/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (10/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Nathan Ponwith Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Maxime Cressy
Player
Nathan Ponwith
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
60%
(
29 of
48)
9
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
3
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
21 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Nick Chappell
60%
(
61 of
102)
1st Serve %
69%
(
64 of
93)
0
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
0
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
42 of
64)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
36%
(
37 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
93)
102
Total Points Won
93
|
2-6 7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Elmar Ejupovic
47%
(
31 of
66)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
78)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
29%
(
19 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
78)
78
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alafia Ayeni
Player
Nathan Ponwith
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
59)
15
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
25 of
31)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
18 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
18 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Samir Banerjee
Player
Nathan Ponwith
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
86)
7
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
5
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
36 of
86)
82
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Ezekiel Clark
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
11
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andre Ilagan
Player
Nathan Ponwith
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
71)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
24 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
71
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nikolay Vylegzhanin
Player
Nathan Ponwith
72%
(
66 of
92)
1st Serve %
63%
(
58 of
92)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
5
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
46%
(
42 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
48 of
92)
98
Total Points Won
86
|
6-7(0) 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jaime Faria
Player
Nathan Ponwith
51%
(
23 of
45)
1st Serve %
55%
(
23 of
42)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
53
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nathan Ponwith
Player
John Echeverria
63%
(
71 of
112)
1st Serve %
60%
(
61 of
102)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
42 of
61)
66%
(
27 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
40 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
38 of
102)
110
Total Points Won
104
|
5-7 6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Eduard Esteve Lobato Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Alvaro Lopez San Martin
Player
Eduard Esteve Lobato
73%
(
69 of
95)
1st Serve %
70%
(
71 of
102)
4
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
6
67%
(
46 of
69)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
45 of
71)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
8 of
31)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
39%
(
37 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
49 of
102)
107
Total Points Won
90
|
6-7(4) 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Eduard Esteve Lobato
Player
Alejandro Moro Canas
57%
(
58 of
102)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
82)
1
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
4
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
34 of
48)
43%
(
19 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
42%
(
43 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
82)
91
Total Points Won
93
|
2-6 6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
Player
Eduard Esteve Lobato
73%
(
47 of
64)
1st Serve %
71%
(
47 of
66)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
0
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
24%
(
4 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
50%
(
32 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
66)
60
Total Points Won
70
|
3-6 6-4 0-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Eduard Esteve Lobato
Player
Duje Ajdukovic
54%
(
53 of
98)
1st Serve %
46%
(
43 of
93)
4
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
2
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
51%
(
23 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
38 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
93)
99
Total Points Won
92
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Bruno Pujol Navarro
Player
Eduard Esteve Lobato
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve %
60%
(
38 of
63)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
18 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
32 of
63)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
7-5 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eduard Esteve Lobato
Player
Carles Cordoba
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve %
44%
(
16 of
36)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
3 of
20)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
7 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
51
Total Points Won
17
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Eduard Esteve Lobato
57%
(
36 of
63)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
24 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
29 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Manuel Guinard
Player
Eduard Esteve Lobato
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
8
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ivan Gakhov
Player
Eduard Esteve Lobato
68%
(
78 of
115)
1st Serve %
58%
(
67 of
116)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
69%
(
54 of
78)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
40 of
67)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
37%
(
42 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
52 of
116)
125
Total Points Won
106
|
6-7(5) 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Eduard Esteve Lobato
Player
Mac Kiger
70%
(
62 of
88)
1st Serve %
67%
(
61 of
91)
4
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
8
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
41 of
61)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
38%
(
33 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
39 of
91)
94
Total Points Won
85
|
6-3 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Ponwith Vs Lobato Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Nathan Ponwith
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
