Nathan Eshmade vs Mario Matejcek Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Eshmade vs Matejcek analysis and find out who is favored!
Nathan Eshmade vs Mario Matejcek Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Eshmade has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Matejcek has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Eshmade, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Matejcek has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Eshmade has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Matejcek has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Eshmade has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Matejcek winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Eshmade has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 32/ 26), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 25% (W/L 2/ 6). Matejcek has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 37% (W/L 10/ 17), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Eshmade winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Eshmade winning 2 and Matejcek winning 0. The last match between Eshmade and Matejcek was at the Australia F1 (Mildura), 07-03-2017, First, Grass with Nathan Eshmade getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:25:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Eshmade and Matejcek have played a deciding set 0 times, with Eshmade winning 0 times and Matejcek 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Eshmade winning 0, and Matejcek 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Eshmade has played against opponents with an average rank of while Matejcek has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Eshmade has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Matejcek has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Eshmade has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Matejcek has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Eshmade 1 - 0 Matejcek
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Ret.
Rank
High
30
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
1
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
29
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
51% (36-35)
Career Total W/L
33% (20-40)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Nathan Eshmade | Mario Matejcek |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 7 |
Aces (Total) | 5 | 3 |
DFs (Total) | 11 | 3 |
Avg Match Time | 1:25:0 | 1:25:0 |
1st Serve % | 59% (35/59) | 67% (33/49) |
1st Serve Win% | 80% (28/35) | 58% (19/33) |
2nd Serve Win% | 42% (10/24) | 38% (6/16) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 80% (4/5) | 100% (2/2) |
Return Points W% | 49% (24/49) | 36% (21/59) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 6-4 |
Nathan Eshmade
Player
Mario Matejcek
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
33 of
49)
5
Aces
3
11
Double Faults
3
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Nathan Eshmade | Mario Matejcek |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Nathan Eshmade Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | 6-1 4-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Benjamin Mitchell
Player
Nathan Eshmade
70%
(
47 of
67)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
21 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Scott Puodziunas
Player
Nathan Eshmade
72%
(
50 of
69)
1st Serve %
48%
(
30 of
63)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
21 of
30)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
23 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Marinko Matosevic
Player
Nathan Eshmade
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
8
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 7-6(3) 3-0 ret. | H2H | |||
Q1 | 4-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Benard Bruno Nkomba
Player
Nathan Eshmade
40%
(
25 of
63)
1st Serve %
48%
(
31 of
64)
2
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
14
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
61%
(
23 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
34 of
64)
74
Total Points Won
53
|
6-0 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Vasile Antonescu
Player
Nathan Eshmade
55%
(
64 of
116)
1st Serve %
56%
(
55 of
98)
5
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
14
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
38 of
55)
46%
(
24 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
43%
(
50 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
41 of
98)
107
Total Points Won
107
|
6-3 3-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Andrei Stefan Apostol
Player
Nathan Eshmade
52%
(
32 of
62)
1st Serve %
51%
(
36 of
71)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
13
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
27 of
36)
80%
(
24 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
12 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
25 of
71)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Julian Onken
Player
Nathan Eshmade
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve %
66%
(
52 of
79)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
43%
(
25 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
42 of
79)
75
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H |
view more
Mario Matejcek Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Nathan Eshmade
Player
Mario Matejcek
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
33 of
49)
5
Aces
3
11
Double Faults
3
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Matthew Dellavedova
Player
Mario Matejcek
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
36%
(
14 of
39)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
53
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Daniel Nolan
Player
Mario Matejcek
84%
(
52 of
62)
1st Serve %
72%
(
51 of
71)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
30%
(
3 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
QF | 4-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
R2 |
Riccardo Bellotti
Player
Mario Matejcek
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve %
73%
(
33 of
45)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
12 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
55
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Mario Matejcek
Player
Pedro Bernardi
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
62%
(
18 of
29)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
11 of
18)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
43%
(
23 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
44
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 ret. | H2H | ||
QF | 6-2 6-2 | H2H |
view more