Natasha Subhash vs Elaine Chervinsky Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Subhash vs Chervinsky analysis and find out who is favored!
Natasha Subhash vs Elaine Chervinsky Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Subhash has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Chervinsky has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Subhash, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Chervinsky has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Subhash has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Chervinsky has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Subhash has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Chervinsky winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Subhash has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 72% (W/L 26/ 10), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 21/ 13). Chervinsky has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 43% (W/L 3/ 4), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Subhash winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Subhash winning 2 and Chervinsky winning 0. The last match between Subhash and Chervinsky was at the W15 Williamsburg, 10-05-2019, Semifinals, Clay with Natasha Subhash getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:52:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Subhash and Chervinsky have played a deciding set 0 times, with Subhash winning 0 times and Chervinsky 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Subhash winning 0, and Chervinsky 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Subhash has played against opponents with an average rank of while Chervinsky has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Subhash has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Chervinsky has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Subhash has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Chervinsky has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Subhash 1 - 0 Chervinsky
2
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
2
Minor
Ret.
Rank
382
High
22
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
20
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
67% (49-24)
Career Total W/L
38% (3-5)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Subhash VS Chervinsky H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Natasha Subhash | Elaine Chervinsky |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 0 |
Aces (Total) | 4 | 1 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 4 |
Avg Match Time | 0:52:0 | 0:52:0 |
1st Serve % | 78% (29/37) | 64% (21/33) |
1st Serve Win% | 72% (21/29) | 33% (7/21) |
2nd Serve Win% | 63% (5/8) | 8% (1/12) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 86% (6/7) | 0% (0/3) |
Return Points W% | 76% (25/33) | 30% (11/37) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Subhash VS Chervinsky H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-0 6-0 |
Natasha Subhash
Player
Elaine Chervinsky
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve %
64%
(
21 of
33)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
8%
(
1 of
12)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
11 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
76%
(
25 of
33)
51
Total Points Won
19
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Natasha Subhash | Elaine Chervinsky |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Natasha Subhash Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Caroline Dolehide
Player
Natasha Subhash
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
77%
(
44 of
57)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
91%
(
29 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
8 of
13)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Natasha Subhash
Player
Johanna Larsson
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
69)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
6 of
30)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
41%
(
22 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
39 of
69)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Natasha Subhash
Player
Giuliana Olmos
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
23 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
59
Total Points Won
53
|
2-6 6-1 10-6 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-4 4-6 10-8 | H2H | |||
R1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Laura Siegemund
Player
Natasha Subhash
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve %
55%
(
27 of
49)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
7 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
56
Total Points Won
28
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
SF |
Deniz Khazaniuk
Player
Natasha Subhash
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve %
70%
(
52 of
74)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Natasha Subhash
Player
Fernanda Contreras Gomez
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
65%
(
44 of
68)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
53%
(
18 of
34)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
21 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
65
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Natasha Subhash
Player
Amy Zhu
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
51%
(
24 of
47)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
17 of
24)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Natasha Subhash
Player
Elizabeth Coleman
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
67%
(
34 of
51)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
9 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H |
view more
Elaine Chervinsky Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Maria Mateas
Player
Elaine Chervinsky
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
45%
(
27 of
60)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
8
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 0-6 6-1 10-6 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Victoria Hu
Player
Elaine Chervinsky
65%
(
51 of
78)
1st Serve %
66%
(
59 of
90)
6
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
14
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
42 of
59)
50%
(
23 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
13 of
42)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
42%
(
41 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
101)
102
Total Points Won
96
|
6-3 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
SF |
Natasha Subhash
Player
Elaine Chervinsky
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve %
64%
(
21 of
33)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
8%
(
1 of
12)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
11 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
76%
(
25 of
33)
51
Total Points Won
19
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
QF |
Elaine Chervinsky
Player
Kimmi Hance
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
70%
(
42 of
60)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
4
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
15 of
42)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
48%
(
28 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Elaine Chervinsky
Player
Mackenzie Clark
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve %
55%
(
31 of
56)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
5
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Elaine Chervinsky
Player
Sophia Hatton
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve %
51%
(
27 of
53)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
6
63%
(
17 of
27)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
13 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
57
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H |
view more