Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Natalija Sipek vs Natalie Proese Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Sipek vs Proese analysis and find out who is favored!
Natalija Sipek vs Natalie Proese Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Sipek has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Proese has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Sipek, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Proese has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Sipek has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Proese has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Sipek has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Proese winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Sipek has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 44/ 34), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2). Proese has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 31% (W/L 4/ 9).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Sipek winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Sipek winning 2 and Proese winning 0. The last match between Sipek and Proese was at the Bol, 20-04-2015, First, Clay with Natalija Sipek getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Sipek and Proese have played a deciding set 0 times, with Sipek winning 0 times and Proese 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Sipek winning 0, and Proese 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Sipek has played against opponents with an average rank of while Proese has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Sipek has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Proese has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Sipek has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Proese has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Sipek 1 - 0 Proese
Ret.
Rank
586
High
27
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
726
High
33
Age
R
Plays
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
Form
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
54% (67-58)
Career Total W/L
41% (113-162)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Natalija Sipek | Natalie Proese |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 4 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-2 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Natalija Sipek | Natalie Proese |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Natalija Sipek Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Kaja Juvan
Player
Natalija Sipek
73%
(
70 of
96)
1st Serve %
49%
(
44 of
90)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
10
51%
(
36 of
70)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
18 of
46)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
50%
(
48 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
47 of
90)
95
Total Points Won
91
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF | 4-6 6-2 7-6(9) | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexandra Perper
Player
Natalija Sipek
57%
(
50 of
88)
1st Serve %
62%
(
55 of
89)
8
Aces
4
8
Double Faults
5
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
38 of
55)
37%
(
14 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
43%
(
38 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
89)
89
Total Points Won
88
|
7-6(6) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Irene Burillo Escorihuela
Player
Natalija Sipek
63%
(
60 of
95)
1st Serve %
51%
(
46 of
91)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
9
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
45%
(
43 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
46 of
91)
98
Total Points Won
88
|
6-3 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Natalija Sipek
Player
Sara Ottomano
56%
(
40 of
72)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
0
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
1
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
30 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
69)
77
Total Points Won
64
|
2-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Raluca Georgiana Serban
Player
Natalija Sipek
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve %
61%
(
28 of
46)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
4
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
100%
(
6 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
28
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alyona Sotnikova
Player
Natalija Sipek
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve %
56%
(
33 of
59)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
19 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
36 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
42
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amanda Carreras
Player
Natalija Sipek
86%
(
51 of
59)
1st Serve %
75%
(
30 of
40)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Karola Patricia Bejenaru
Player
Natalija Sipek
58%
(
34 of
59)
1st Serve %
68%
(
40 of
59)
9
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
8
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Natalie Proese Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Alessandra Mazzola
Player
Natalie Proese
64%
(
56 of
87)
1st Serve %
68%
(
53 of
78)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
43%
(
37 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
78)
90
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 7-5 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Eline Audenaert
Player
Natalie Proese
75%
(
57 of
76)
1st Serve %
67%
(
55 of
82)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
43%
(
33 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
42 of
82)
85
Total Points Won
73
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Natalie Proese
Player
Natea Bizet
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
49%
(
30 of
61)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
11
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
6 of
31)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
44%
(
24 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
37 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eva Vedder
Player
Natalie Proese
49%
(
19 of
39)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
58%
(
11 of
19)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
16 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
55
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 2-6 6-2 10-6 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Julia Stamatova
Player
Natalie Proese
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
76%
(
32 of
42)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve Won
25%
(
8 of
32)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
45%
(
26 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 1-6 10-8 | H2H | |||
view more
Sipek Vs Proese Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
