Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Natalija Kostic vs Celine Naef Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kostic vs Naef analysis and find out who is favored!
Natalija Kostic vs Celine Naef Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kostic has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Naef has won 47.32%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kostic, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Naef has won 54.37%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 38.39% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kostic has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Naef has saved 57.01% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kostic has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Naef winning 55.93% (W/L 33/ 26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kostic has played against opponents with an average rank of while Naef has played against players with an average rank of 208.64.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kostic has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Naef has won 44% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kostic has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Naef has converted 42.91% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Kostic 0 - 0 Naef
N/A
Rank
High
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
18
Age
Plays
Form
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Natalija Kostic | Celine Naef |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 1st Match | 58% (14/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 1st Match | 61% (34/22) |
| Games Win/Loss | 1st Match | 56% (285/225) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 1st Match | 60% (3/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 1st Match | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 1st Match | 58% (11/8) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 1st Match | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 1st Match | 0.35 |
| Aces Total | 1st Match | 87 |
| DFs per game | 1st Match | 0.2 |
| DFs Total | 1st Match | 51 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:39:4 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 1st Match | 168.75 |
| 1st Serve % | 1st Match | 60% (1009/1669) |
| 1st Serve W% | 1st Match | 69% (693/1009) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 1st Match | 47% (313/660) |
| BPs Won% Total | 1st Match | 43% (96/223) |
| Return Pts W% | 1st Match | 45% (769/1699) |
| Slam W/L | 1st Match | 50% (1/1) |
| Masters W/L | 1st Match | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 1st Match | 0% (0/2) |
| Main Tour W/L | 1st Match | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 1st Match | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 1st Match | 65% (13/7) |
| Futures W/L | 1st Match | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 1st Match | 58% (14/24) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 1st Match | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 1st Match | 63% (5/8) |
| Deciding Set W% | 1st Match | 25% (2/8) |
| 1st set W, W | 1st Match | 87% (15/13) |
| 1st set W, L | 1st Match | 13% (15/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 1st Match | 11% (9/1) |
Natalija Kostic Recent Matches Played
Before:
No Past Matches Available
Celine Naef Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubber 3 |
Stats 
Iga Swiatek
Player
Celine Naef
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
33%
(
4 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Magdalena Frech
Player
Celine Naef
71%
(
77 of
109)
1st Serve %
62%
(
70 of
113)
3
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
70%
(
54 of
77)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
49 of
70)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
37%
(
40 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
47 of
113)
116
Total Points Won
106
|
6-7(8) 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mona Barthel
Player
Celine Naef
66%
(
63 of
95)
1st Serve %
57%
(
50 of
88)
12
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
72%
(
23 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
33 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
88)
98
Total Points Won
85
|
6-3 6-7(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Alison Van Uytvanck
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve %
65%
(
24 of
37)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
52
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Joanna Garland
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve %
51%
(
33 of
65)
9
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
5
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
14 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
26 of
65)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elena Pridankina
Player
Celine Naef
67%
(
67 of
100)
1st Serve %
64%
(
70 of
110)
2
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
45 of
70)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
40%
(
40 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
44 of
110)
104
Total Points Won
106
|
6-2 1-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Celine Naef
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve %
57%
(
25 of
44)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
66
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Jana Fett
61%
(
56 of
92)
1st Serve %
62%
(
58 of
94)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
8
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
42%
(
39 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
46 of
94)
99
Total Points Won
87
|
6-2 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Himeno Sakatsume
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
86%
(
30 of
35)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
55
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Tereza Martincova
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
70%
(
37 of
53)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Kostic Vs Naef Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
