Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Natalie Proese vs Eugenia Ganga Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Proese vs Ganga analysis and find out who is favored!
Natalie Proese vs Eugenia Ganga Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Proese has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Ganga has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Proese, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Ganga has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Proese has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ganga has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Proese has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Ganga winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Proese has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 31% (W/L 4/ 9). Ganga has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 90/ 55), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 11/ 8).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Proese winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Proese winning 2 and Ganga winning 0. The last match between Proese and Ganga was at the Schio, 23-07-2018, First, Clay with Natalie Proese getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:35:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Proese and Ganga have played a deciding set 0 times, with Proese winning 0 times and Ganga 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Proese winning 0, and Ganga 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Proese has played against opponents with an average rank of while Ganga has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Proese has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ganga has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Proese has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ganga has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Proese 1 - 0 Ganga
Ret.
Rank
726
High
33
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
654
High
25
Age
Plays
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
Form
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
41% (113-162)
Career Total W/L
62% (101-63)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Natalie Proese | Eugenia Ganga |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:35:0 | 1:35:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (42/61) | 64% (32/50) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 57% (24/42) | 44% (14/32) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 47% (9/19) | 22% (4/18) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 78% (7/9) | 57% (4/7) |
| Return Points W% | 64% (32/50) | 46% (28/61) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-4 |
Stats 
Natalie Proese
Player
Eugenia Ganga
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
7
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
46%
(
28 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Natalie Proese | Eugenia Ganga |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Natalie Proese Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Alessandra Mazzola
Player
Natalie Proese
64%
(
56 of
87)
1st Serve %
68%
(
53 of
78)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
43%
(
37 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
78)
90
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 7-5 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Eline Audenaert
Player
Natalie Proese
75%
(
57 of
76)
1st Serve %
67%
(
55 of
82)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
43%
(
33 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
42 of
82)
85
Total Points Won
73
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Natalie Proese
Player
Natea Bizet
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
49%
(
30 of
61)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
11
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
6 of
31)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
44%
(
24 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
37 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eva Vedder
Player
Natalie Proese
49%
(
19 of
39)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
58%
(
11 of
19)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
16 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
55
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 2-6 6-2 10-6 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Julia Stamatova
Player
Natalie Proese
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
76%
(
32 of
42)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve Won
25%
(
8 of
32)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
45%
(
26 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 1-6 10-8 | H2H | |||
view more
Eugenia Ganga Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Thaisa Grana Pedretti
Player
Eugenia Ganga
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
11
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
47
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Eugenia Ganga
Player
Antonia Samudio
44%
(
20 of
45)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
6
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
75)
70
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eugenia Ganga
Player
Sabina Dadaciu
73%
(
8 of
11)
1st Serve %
46%
(
6 of
13)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
50%
(
4 of
8)
1st Serve Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
67%
(
2 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Rtn Points Won
92%
(
12 of
13)
18
Total Points Won
6
|
4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dasha Ivanova
Player
Eugenia Ganga
58%
(
37 of
64)
1st Serve %
54%
(
35 of
65)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eugenia Ganga
Player
Elyse Lavender
57%
(
64 of
113)
1st Serve %
44%
(
53 of
120)
0
Aces
2
15
Double Faults
5
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
39%
(
19 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
50%
(
56 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
60 of
120)
117
Total Points Won
116
|
5-7 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Luisa Stefani
Player
Eugenia Ganga
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
65%
(
30 of
46)
6
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
33%
(
7 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
41%
(
22 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
54
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Eugenia Ganga
Player
Lara Escauriza
54%
(
38 of
71)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
66)
1
Aces
0
10
Double Faults
5
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
27%
(
9 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
52%
(
37 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
67
|
3-6 6-4 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maria Lourdes Carle
Player
Eugenia Ganga
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve %
66%
(
41 of
62)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
7
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Guillermina Naya
Player
Eugenia Ganga
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
4
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
44%
(
26 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Eugenia Ganga
Player
Anfisa Danilchenko
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve %
68%
(
28 of
41)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
6
64%
(
14 of
22)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
13 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
53
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Proese Vs Ganga Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
