Natalie Barbir vs Olivia Quigley Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Barbir vs Quigley analysis and find out who is favored!
Natalie Barbir vs Olivia Quigley Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Barbir has won 37.06% of points on his second serve, while Quigley has won 32.35%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Barbir, in recent form, has won 59.82% of his opponent's second serve points, while Quigley has won 51.72%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.42% and 33.33% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Barbir has saved 41.18% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Quigley has saved 47.5% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Barbir has won 25% of matches played (W/L 4/ 12), with Quigley winning 41.67% (W/L 5/ 7) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Barbir has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 3/ 6), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Quigley has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 56% (W/L 5/ 4), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Barbir has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 25% of matches (W/L 3/ 9), where as Quigley has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 5/ 5). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Barbir winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Barbir winning 2 and Quigley winning 0. The last match between Barbir and Quigley was at the W25 Traralgon, 13-11-2022, Q1 round, Hard with Natalie Barbir getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Barbir and Quigley have played a deciding set 0 times, with Barbir winning 0 times and Quigley 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Barbir winning 0, and Quigley 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Barbir has played against opponents with an average rank of 36.5 while Quigley has played against players with an average rank of 113.92.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Barbir has won 20% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Quigley has won 67% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Barbir has converted 39.68% of breakpoint opportunities, and Quigley has converted 47.37% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Barbir 1 - 0 Quigley
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
34
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
23
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
22% (34-122)
Career Total W/L
30% (7-16)
0% (0-4)
YTD W/L
56% (5-4)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Natalie Barbir | Olivia Quigley |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 2 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-0 6-2 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Natalie Barbir | Olivia Quigley |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/4) | 56% (5/4) |
Sets Win/Loss | 20% (2/8) | 52% (11/10) |
Games Win/Loss | 38% (36/59) | 52% (106/96) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 33% (1/2) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 67% (4/2) |
Aces pg | 0.11 | 0.03 |
Aces Total | 5 | 3 |
DFs per game | 0.28 | 0.1 |
DFs Total | 13 | 10 |
Avg Match Time | 1:45:30 | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 146 | 91.44 |
1st Serve % | 65% (170/261) | 58% (119/204) |
1st Serve W% | 56% (95/170) | 57% (68/119) |
2nd Serve W% | 40% (36/91) | 35% (30/85) |
BPs Won% Total | 33% (12/36) | 53% (8/15) |
Return Pts W% | 41% (119/287) | 42% (75/178) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/4) | 56% (5/4) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/4) | 56% (5/9) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/2) | 67% (2/3) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 80% (5/4) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 20% (5/1) |
1st set L, W | 0% (4/0) | 25% (4/1) |
Natalie Barbir Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Bridget Mihulka
Player
Natalie Barbir
56%
(
74 of
131)
1st Serve %
61%
(
63 of
103)
6
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
4
64%
(
47 of
74)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
49%
(
28 of
57)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
43%
(
56 of
131)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
48 of
103)
123
Total Points Won
111
|
6-3 6-7(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Amelia Zylberman
Player
Natalie Barbir
50%
(
62 of
123)
1st Serve %
66%
(
78 of
119)
1
Aces
4
18
Double Faults
6
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
46 of
78)
34%
(
21 of
61)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
14 of
41)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
47%
(
58 of
123)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
59 of
119)
124
Total Points Won
118
|
7-6(7) 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Ena Shibahara
Player
Natalie Barbir
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve %
74%
(
29 of
39)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
51
Total Points Won
21
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Alana Subasic
Player
Natalie Barbir
70%
(
54 of
77)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
48%
(
37 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
71
Total Points Won
61
|
6-2 3-6 13-11 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Natalie Barbir
Player
Bianca Compuesto
82%
(
49 of
60)
1st Serve %
48%
(
31 of
64)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
9 of
33)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
40%
(
24 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(1) 4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
QF |
Denise Torrealba
Player
Natalie Barbir
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
54%
(
33 of
61)
0
Aces
2
12
Double Faults
4
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
28%
(
7 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
26 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-4 0-6 12-10 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Mia Horvit
Player
Natalie Barbir
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve %
54%
(
25 of
46)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
24%
(
6 of
25)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
10 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
33 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
23
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-3 2-6 10-2 | H2H |
view more
Olivia Quigley Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Christina Dodaj
Player
Olivia Quigley
57%
(
39 of
69)
1st Serve %
63%
(
54 of
86)
5
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
4
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
27 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
86)
81
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-1 3-0 ret. | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-3 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Punnin Kovapitukted
Player
Olivia Quigley
54%
(
20 of
37)
1st Serve %
53%
(
21 of
40)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
11 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
53
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Olivia Quigley
Player
Jamie Lau
56%
(
44 of
78)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
72)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
10
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
32%
(
11 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
51%
(
40 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
72)
75
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 2-6 10-6 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 3-6 6-2 10-6 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 5-7 6-4 10-8 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Hiroko Kuwata
Player
Olivia Quigley
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve %
58%
(
23 of
40)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
15 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H |
view more