Naoko Eto vs Richel Hogenkamp Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Eto vs Hogenkamp analysis and find out who is favored!
Naoko Eto vs Richel Hogenkamp Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Eto has won 42.59% of points on his second serve, while Hogenkamp has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Eto, in recent form, has won 56.96% of his opponent's second serve points, while Hogenkamp has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 39.31% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Eto has saved 46.15% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hogenkamp has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Eto has won 37.93% of matches played (W/L 11/ 18), with Hogenkamp winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Eto has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 25% (W/L 3/ 9), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 17% (W/L 12/ 60). Hogenkamp has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 215/ 132), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 42% (W/L 14/ 19).
- Player level: In the last year, Eto has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 36.36% of matches (W/L 8/ 14), where as Hogenkamp has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Eto winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Eto winning 0 and Hogenkamp winning 2. The last match between Eto and Hogenkamp was at the Santa Margherita Di Pula, 28-03-2018, First, Clay with Richel Hogenkamp getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:35:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Eto and Hogenkamp have played a deciding set 0 times, with Eto winning 0 times and Hogenkamp 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Eto winning 0, and Hogenkamp 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Eto has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Hogenkamp has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Eto has won 57% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hogenkamp has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Eto has converted 42.59% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hogenkamp has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Eto 0 - 1 Hogenkamp
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
853
Rank
843
High
39
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
896
Rank
94
High
31
Age
R
Plays
16
Total
0
Mast
12
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
4
Minor
Form
17% (38-181)
Career Total W/L
59% (414-282)
50% (3-3)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$542,444
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Naoko Eto | Richel Hogenkamp |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
Games Won | 0 | 12 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 5 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:35:0 | 0:35:0 |
1st Serve % | 57% (17/30) | 53% (16/30) |
1st Serve Win% | 18% (3/17) | 69% (11/16) |
2nd Serve Win% | 23% (3/13) | 93% (13/14) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 60% (6/10) |
Return Points W% | 20% (6/30) | 80% (24/30) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-0 6-0 |
Richel Hogenkamp
Player
Naoko Eto
53%
(
16 of
30)
1st Serve %
57%
(
17 of
30)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
5
69%
(
11 of
16)
1st Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
93%
(
13 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
6 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
80%
(
24 of
30)
48
Total Points Won
12
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Naoko Eto | Richel Hogenkamp |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 50% (6/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 47% (51/57) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.02 | 0 |
Aces Total | 1 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.32 | 0 |
DFs Total | 17 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 63% (102/163) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 51% (52/102) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 39% (24/61) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 63% (12/19) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 48% (77/160) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (3/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (3/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (3/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Naoko Eto Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Bronte Murgett
Player
Naoko Eto
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
5
63%
(
17 of
27)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
43%
(
18 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
33
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Naoko Eto
Player
Sara-Maria Calmuschi
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
25 of
42)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
57
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Isabella Marton
Player
Naoko Eto
63%
(
48 of
76)
1st Serve %
60%
(
38 of
63)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
9
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
47%
(
36 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Carolann Delaunay
Player
Naoko Eto
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
65%
(
35 of
54)
-
Aces
-
10
Double Faults
5
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
36%
(
10 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
44%
(
31 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
Naoko Eto
Player
Yanni Liu
80%
(
51 of
64)
1st Serve %
67%
(
64 of
95)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
4
53%
(
27 of
51)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
44%
(
28 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
46 of
95)
82
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-3 10-6 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Naoko Eto
Player
Shannon Spencer
87%
(
39 of
45)
1st Serve %
50%
(
17 of
34)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
51%
(
20 of
39)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
13 of
17)
0%
(
0 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
56%
(
25 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
34
Total Points Won
44
|
1-6 6-1 10-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-0 7-5 | H2H |
view more
Richel Hogenkamp Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Guiomar Zuleta De Reales
Player
Richel Hogenkamp
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve %
53%
(
43 of
81)
7
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
9
88%
(
36 of
41)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
19 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
81)
86
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(8) 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Olivia Gadecki
Player
Richel Hogenkamp
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
81%
(
13 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
11 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
20 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Yuki Naito
Player
Richel Hogenkamp
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Anastasia Tikhonova
Player
Richel Hogenkamp
50%
(
30 of
60)
1st Serve %
50%
(
26 of
52)
5
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
5
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Richel Hogenkamp
Player
Ekaterina Reyngold
59%
(
54 of
91)
1st Serve %
66%
(
59 of
89)
1
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
6
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
37 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
41 of
89)
95
Total Points Won
85
|
6-4 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Richel Hogenkamp
Player
Ekaterina Kazionova
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
67%
(
42 of
63)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
9
50%
(
19 of
38)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
50%
(
31 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
64
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R3 |
Carol Zhao
Player
Richel Hogenkamp
63%
(
57 of
90)
1st Serve %
62%
(
61 of
98)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
4
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
38 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
98)
94
Total Points Won
94
|
6-2 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Richel Hogenkamp
Player
Christina Rosca
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
3
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Linda Fruhvirtova
Player
Richel Hogenkamp
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
94%
(
29 of
31)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
33%
(
7 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
32 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Richel Hogenkamp
Player
Salma Djoubri
61%
(
47 of
77)
1st Serve %
61%
(
58 of
95)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
37)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
31 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
46 of
95)
92
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H |
view more