O. Crawford
To Win
H. Chung
To Win
Naoki Nakagawa vs Hyeon Chung Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L L L L W W W L
Form
W W W W L L W W W WHead-to-head: Nakagawa 0 - 0 Chung
Upcoming Match
16 Mar 2025 / Final
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Rune VS Medvedev PREDICTION Hard
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells atp
14 Mar 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Sabalenka VS Andreeva PREDICTION Hard
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells wta
15 Mar 2025 / Final
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
No H2H Matches Available
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Naoki Nakagawa vs Hyeon Chung Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Naoki Nakagawa 0 - 0 Hyeon Chung
Prediction insight for the upcoming tennis match:
- Recent second serve performance: In the past six months, Nakagawa has exhibited a commendable second serve prowess, winning 51.99% of points, while Chung's success rate stands at 50.76%. It is worth noting the significant correlation between this statistic and the accuracy of match predictions.
- Recent return game statistics: Analyzing the return game statistics of both players in recent form, Nakagawa has triumphed in 48.86% of their opponent's second serve points, whereas Chung has achieved a success rate of 53.4%. The figures for first serve returns are 28.94% and 35.59%, respectively. These statistics provide valuable insights into determining the favored player in this compelling head-to-head matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: When facing crucial moments, Nakagawa has demonstrated an impressive ability to save breakpoints, successfully rescuing 59.34% of them in recent matches. In contrast, Chung has managed to salvage 55.56% of breakpoints. These percentages serve as useful indicators for making in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Examining their performance over the past year, Nakagawa has emerged victorious in 60.42% of the matches played (29 wins and 19 losses), while Chung boasts a win percentage of 57.14% (8 wins and 6 losses). This overview provides a comprehensive prediction of their head-to-head encounter.
- Preferred playing surface: Nakagawa exhibits exceptional proficiency on indoor hard courts, securing victory in 61% of matches (19 wins and 12 losses). Conversely, their success rate on clay courts is slightly lower, standing at 60% (112 wins and 74 losses). Chung, on the other hand, excels on hard courts, winning 68% of matches (202 wins and 93 losses), but struggles on grass courts, with a win rate of only 20% (2 wins and 8 losses).
- Player level: Over the past year, Nakagawa has predominantly competed in Challengers and ITF tournaments with a prize money exceeding $10,000. Their success rate in such events stands at 50% (15 wins and 15 losses). Chung, however, has mainly participated in Futures, Satellites, and ITF tournaments with a prize money of $10,000, and has achieved a higher win percentage of 63.64% (7 wins and 4 losses). It is essential to consider the level of competition when comparing player statistics to predict the favorite.
- Opponent quality statistics: When assessing the quality of opponents faced by the players in the last 12 months, Nakagawa's average opponent rank was 433.77, while Chung encountered opponents with an average rank of 261.71.
- Deciding set performance: For those interested in live predictions and betting, it is noteworthy that Nakagawa has emerged victorious in 64% of deciding sets in the past year, whereas Chung's success rate stands at 25% in matches played on the professional tour.
- Current event head-to-head statistics: While past player performance serves as a valuable tool for predicting tennis matches, it is equally crucial to consider current event statistics to assess players' current form. Additional information regarding the current event can be found in the section below, especially relevant if the players have already participated in matches during this event. Moreover, certain players tend to excel in specific events, and this factor must be taken into account when making predictions.
- Break point conversion: In recent times, Nakagawa has efficiently converted 40.1% of breakpoint opportunities, while Chung has capitalized on 47.47% of chances to break their opponent's serve. This statistic carries significant weight when making in-game live betting decisions during crucial moments.
- If you are interested in utilizing advanced models for predicting tennis matches, this article offers an excellent starting point (Warning: Limited to avid statistics enthusiasts).
Naoki Nakagawa Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats 
Christian Langmo
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
68%
(
57 of
84)
1st Serve %
57%
(
50 of
87)
13
Aces
13
2
Double Faults
1
82%
(
47 of
57)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
21 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
29 of
87)
92
Total Points Won
79
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Naoki Nakagawa
Player
Ajeet Rai
44%
(
30 of
68)
1st Serve %
68%
(
44 of
65)
3
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
2
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
58%
(
22 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
20 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Naoki Nakagawa
Player
Kody Pearson
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve %
75%
(
50 of
67)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
41%
(
34 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
79
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Naoki Nakagawa
Player
Collin Altamirano
49%
(
27 of
55)
1st Serve %
67%
(
30 of
45)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
0
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
52
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kousuke Ogura
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
76%
(
81 of
106)
1st Serve %
49%
(
45 of
91)
1
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
1
63%
(
51 of
81)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
33 of
45)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
38%
(
40 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
33 of
91)
99
Total Points Won
98
|
7-6(4) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marek Gengel
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
49%
(
29 of
59)
6
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
2
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
23 of
29)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
11 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
23 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Fajing Sun
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
81)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
24 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
38 of
81)
85
Total Points Won
67
|
6-2 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kokoro Isomura
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
51%
(
30 of
59)
2
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
0
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
8 of
29)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Naoki Nakagawa
Player
Sanhui Shin
45%
(
38 of
84)
1st Serve %
56%
(
57 of
102)
11
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
41 of
57)
52%
(
24 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
29 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
41 of
102)
96
Total Points Won
90
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Rei Sakamoto
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
58%
(
45 of
77)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
12
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
13 of
20)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
22 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
18 of
60)
73
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(9) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Hyeon Chung Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Hyeon Chung
Player
Jie Cui
55%
(
34 of
62)
1st Serve %
71%
(
50 of
70)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
37 of
70)
77
Total Points Won
55
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hyeon Chung
Player
Yan Bai
59%
(
46 of
78)
1st Serve %
55%
(
27 of
49)
0
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
1
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
66%
(
21 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
29 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
74
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hyeon Chung
Player
Kokoro Isomura
64%
(
60 of
94)
1st Serve %
64%
(
70 of
109)
2
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
6
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
39 of
70)
26%
(
9 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
50%
(
47 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
50 of
109)
97
Total Points Won
106
|
7-5 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hyeon Chung
Player
Zhan Zheng
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve %
72%
(
53 of
74)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
81%
(
38 of
47)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
35 of
53)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
27%
(
19 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
27 of
74)
79
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ajeet Rai
Player
Hyeon Chung
63%
(
53 of
84)
1st Serve %
52%
(
42 of
81)
10
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
4
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
34 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
38 of
81)
88
Total Points Won
77
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Omar Jasika
Player
Hyeon Chung
69%
(
60 of
87)
1st Serve %
58%
(
46 of
80)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
36 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
80)
89
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(2) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hyeon Chung
Player
Shintaro Imai
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
3
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
1
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hyeon Chung
Player
Joshua Charlton
55%
(
28 of
51)
1st Serve %
70%
(
35 of
50)
6
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
1
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hyeon Chung
Player
Yuichiro Inui
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Hyeon Chung
Player
Giles Hussey
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve %
71%
(
29 of
41)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
55
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
61% (323/210)
Win/Loss
65% (258/140)
58% (720/526)
Sets Win/Loss
62% (588/364)
52% (6226/5646)
Games Win/Loss
55% (4809/3977)
61% (191/123)
Hard Win/Loss
69% (209/95)
60% (112/74)
Clay Win/Loss
59% (30/21)
61% (20/13)
Indoor Hard W/L
52% (17/16)
0% (0/0)
Grass Win/Loss
20% (2/8)
0.31
Aces Per Game
0.27
1827
Aces Total
1140
0.18
Double Faults Per Game
0.22
1054
Total Double Faults
938
1:19:38
Average Match Time
1:23:5
466.25
Average Opponent Rank
523.82
57% (15764/27642)
1st Serve %
62% (14125/22607)
69% (10941/15764)
1st Serve Win %
71% (9959/14125)
50% (5975/11878)
2nd Serve Win %
51% (4301/8482)
42% (1151/2734)
Break Points Won % (Total)
45% (1112/2497)
40% (10977/27779)
Return Points Win %
41% (9664/23555)
0% (0/0)
Slam W/L
58% (22/16)
0% (0/0)
Masters W/L
52% (17/16)
0% (0/0)
Cups W/L
83% (10/2)
0% (0/2)
Main Tour W/L
53% (54/47)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
46% (62/73)
Challenger W/L
70% (92/39)
66% (261/135)
Futures W/L
76% (63/20)
61% (319/527)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
65% (232/357)
67% (2/3)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
64% (23/36)
58% (99/172)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
52% (60/116)
58% (105/180)
Deciding Set Win %
58% (64/110)
88% (294/258)
1st Set Won, Won Match
87% (257/224)
12% (294/36)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
13% (257/33)
27% (239/65)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
24% (141/34)
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Hyeon Chung
View full predicted draw for Chung
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
