Naoki Nakagawa vs Ajeet Rai Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L L W L L W W L
Form
L W W L L W L L W LH2H: Nakagawa 1 - 0 Rai
They have played 2 sets in total, with Nakagawa winning 2 and Rai winning 0. The last match between Nakagawa and Rai was at the M25 Timaru, 14-02-2025, Round: Quarterfinals, Surface: Hard, with Naoki Nakagawa getting the victory 7-6(4) 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Naoki Nakagawa | 1 |
| Ajeet Rai | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: M25 Timaru(14-02-2025)
Naoki Nakagawa
Ajeet Rai
7
6
6
1
| Nakagawa | Stats | Rai |
|---|---|---|
| 44% (8-10) | YTD Win/Loss | 52% (11-10) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 332 | Ranking | 474 |
| 332 | Highest Rank | 417 |
| 28 | Age | 26 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 6 | Titles | 4 |
| 60% (327-215) | Career Total W/L | 56% (191-150) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $3,445 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Halys VS Medvedev PREDICTION Grass
Terra Wortmann Open - Halle atp
18 Jun 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Popyrin VS Vukic PREDICTION Grass
cinch Championships - London atp
17 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(4) 6-1 |
Stats 
Naoki Nakagawa
Player
Ajeet Rai
44%
(
30 of
68)
1st Serve %
68%
(
44 of
65)
3
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
2
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
58%
(
22 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
20 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 7 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 7 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:43:7 | Average Match Time | 1:43:7 |
| 44% (30/68) | 1st Serve % | 68% (44/65) |
| 87% (26/30) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (29/44) |
| 58% (22/38) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (11/21) |
| 29% (2/7) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 38% (25/65) | Return Points Win % | 29% (20/68) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Nakagawa vs Rai Match Preview :
Analysis of Second Serve Performance
In recent months, Rai has exhibited a second serve success rate of 47.34%, whereas Nakagawa has achieved a commendable 51.17% in this aspect. It is worth mentioning that there exists a noteworthy correlation between these statistics and the accuracy of match predictions.
Return Game Statistics
When evaluating return game prowess, recent data reveals that Rai has triumphed in 51.91% of their opponent's second serve points, while Nakagawa boasts a slightly lower but still impressive rate of 49.15%. The statistics pertaining to first serve returns are equally compelling, with Rai's success rate standing at 33.19% compared to Nakagawa's 29.27%. These figures hold significant relevance in determining the favorite for this highly anticipated head-to-head matchup.
Under Pressure Analysis
Delving into the realm of clutch performances, Rai has managed to save an impressive 60% of breakpoints in recent times. Similarly, Nakagawa has displayed resilience by thwarting 58.86% of such crucial moments. These statistics serve as invaluable indicators for in-game betting predictions.
Performance Overview
Examining the broader scope of their careers, Rai has triumphed in 56.06% of matches played over the past year, boasting an impressive win-loss record of 37/29. Nakagawa, on the other hand, has displayed an even higher overall success rate of 60.87% (28/18). These figures provide us with a comprehensive head-to-head prediction overview.
Best Surface Preferences
When discussing preferred surfaces, Rai has excelled on hard courts, attaining a remarkable 57% success rate (157/119), while struggling slightly on indoor hard courts with a 33% winning ratio (1/2). In contrast, Nakagawa has achieved his highest win percentage on indoor hard courts, with an exceptional 61% (19/12), while facing challenges on clay where his record stands at 60% (112/74).
Player Level and Tournament Types
Within the past year, Rai has primarily competed in the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments ($10K), managing to succeed in 60.42% of matches played (29/19). Conversely, Nakagawa has predominantly participated in the Challengers/ITF tournaments exceeding a $10K prize pool, with a winning record of 50% (15/15). It is important to keep in mind that when assessing statistics and predicting the favored player, these figures are contingent upon the level of events they have been competing in.
Opponent Quality Statistics
Over the course of the past year, Rai has faced opponents with an average ranking of 153.44, while Nakagawa has encountered adversaries with an average ranking of 170.15. These figures shed light on the caliber of competition each player has encountered, further aiding in determining their performance expectations.
Deciding Set Performance
If you are interested in live predictions and betting, it is worthwhile to note that Rai has emerged victorious in 50% of deciding sets played over the past 12 months. Nakagawa, on the other hand, has achieved an impressive success rate of 69% in all matches contested on tour, further emphasizing their proficiency in crucial moments.
Current Event Head-to-Head Stats
Although examining historical player performance proves indispensable in predicting tennis outcomes, it becomes equally critical to analyze current event stats for a more accurate assessment of an in-form player. For specific details regarding this aspect, kindly refer to the section below, particularly if either player has already competed in the ongoing event. It is also worth noting that certain players may exhibit better performances at specific tournaments, and this factor should be taken into consideration when predicting the ultimate outcome.
Break Point Conversion Rates
Recent records uncover Rai's ability to convert 41.98% of their breakpoint opportunities. Nakagawa, on the other hand, has demonstrated a slightly lower but still commendable rate of 40.44% when aiming to break their opponents' serve. These enlightening statistics provide astute insights for in-game live betting tips whenever either player finds themselves enjoying a breakpoint opportunity.
If you are intrigued by predictive models for tennis matches, this informative article offers an excellent starting point (Warning: Recommended for stats enthusiasts).
Nakagawa vs Rai Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Naoki Nakagawa Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Andres Andrade
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
51%
(
24 of
47)
1st Serve %
53%
(
29 of
55)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Naoki Nakagawa
Player
Alexis Galarneau
42%
(
24 of
57)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
40%
(
23 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Naoki Nakagawa
Player
Alexander Kotzen
47%
(
28 of
60)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
66%
(
21 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
16 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
22 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Moerani Bouzige
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
46%
(
30 of
65)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
12
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
3
93%
(
28 of
30)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
34 of
42)
66%
(
23 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
22%
(
14 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
22 of
69)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sanhui Shin
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve %
62%
(
46 of
74)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
6-1 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Naoki Nakagawa
Player
Evgeny Karlovskiy
51%
(
47 of
92)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
51%
(
23 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
41%
(
38 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
75)
85
Total Points Won
82
|
2-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Adrian Mannarino
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
62%
(
50 of
81)
1st Serve %
57%
(
47 of
83)
4
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
5
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
35 of
47)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
32%
(
26 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
83)
87
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Taiyo Yamanaka
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
42%
(
27 of
65)
7
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
27%
(
17 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
54
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Ajeet Rai Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Martin Damm
Player
Ajeet Rai
59%
(
42 of
71)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
85)
16
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
20 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
32 of
85)
83
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ajeet Rai
Player
Olaf Pieczkowski
62%
(
48 of
77)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
85)
7
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
7
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
34%
(
26 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
85)
89
Total Points Won
73
|
4-6 7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Filip Peliwo
Player
Ajeet Rai
56%
(
15 of
27)
1st Serve %
42%
(
15 of
36)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
80%
(
12 of
15)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
10 of
15)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
7 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
39
Total Points Won
24
|
6-3 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Christian Langmo
Player
Ajeet Rai
56%
(
61 of
108)
1st Serve %
62%
(
63 of
102)
9
Aces
8
10
Double Faults
6
82%
(
50 of
61)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
43 of
63)
36%
(
17 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
38%
(
41 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
43 of
102)
110
Total Points Won
100
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ajeet Rai
Player
Zijiang Yang
53%
(
39 of
73)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
79)
11
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
23 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
79)
82
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(2) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Viktor Durasovic
Player
Ajeet Rai
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve %
58%
(
36 of
62)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Christian Langmo
Player
Ajeet Rai
63%
(
54 of
86)
1st Serve %
54%
(
46 of
85)
8
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
2
85%
(
46 of
54)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
35 of
46)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
30%
(
26 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
26 of
85)
86
Total Points Won
85
|
3-6 7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ajeet Rai
Player
Benjamin O'Connell
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve %
68%
(
23 of
34)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
14 of
19)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
75%
(
6 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
7 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
40
Total Points Won
21
|
6-1 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60% (327/215) | Win/Loss | 56% (191/150) |
| 58% (729/537) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (430/339) |
| 52% (6316/5742) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (3751/3356) |
| 61% (195/127) | Hard Win/Loss | 56% (163/126) |
| 60% (112/75) | Clay Win/Loss | 56% (18/14) |
| 61% (20/13) | Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 53% (9/8) |
| 0.32 | Aces Per Game | 0.48 |
| 1865 | Aces Total | 1679 |
| 0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.23 |
| 1079 | Total Double Faults | 805 |
| 1:19:58 | Average Match Time | 1:25:45 |
| 463.98 | Average Opponent Rank | 468.5 |
| 57% (16077/28241) | 1st Serve % | 60% (11627/19291) |
| 69% (11160/16077) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (8216/11627) |
| 50% (6117/12164) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (3757/7666) |
| 42% (1174/2785) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (794/1881) |
| 39% (11185/28344) | Return Points Win % | 40% (7589/19211) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 18% (2/9) |
| 0% (0/3) | Main Tour W/L | 17% (1/5) |
| 46% (65/76) | Challenger W/L | 41% (22/32) |
| 66% (262/136) | Futures W/L | 61% (166/104) |
| 60% (323/536) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (183/319) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 40% (4/10) |
| 57% (99/175) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (44/88) |
| 58% (106/182) | Deciding Set Win % | 49% (44/90) |
| 88% (298/261) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (196/165) |
| 12% (298/37) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (196/30) |
| 27% (244/66) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (145/25) |
Nakagawa vs. Rai Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
