Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Nao Hibino vs Eri Hozumi Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hibino vs Hozumi analysis and find out who is favored!
Nao Hibino vs Eri Hozumi Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hibino has won 44.48% of points on his second serve, while Hozumi has won 50.55%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hibino, in recent form, has won 54.08% of his opponent's second serve points, while Hozumi has won 59.23%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.04% and 36.36% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hibino has saved 54.13% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hozumi has saved 46.43% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hibino has won 54.93% of matches played (W/L 39/ 32), with Hozumi winning 50% (W/L 7/ 7) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hibino has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 15/ 11), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 47% (W/L 43/ 49). Hozumi has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 65% (W/L 48/ 26), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 38% (W/L 8/ 13).
- Player level: In the last year, Hibino has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 11/ 11), where as Hozumi has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 53.85% of matches (W/L 7/ 6). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 10 times before with Hibino winning 7 times. They have played 20 sets in total, with Hibino winning 14 and Hozumi winning 6. The last match between Hibino and Hozumi was at the Guadalajara Open Akron - Guadalajara, 15-10-2022, Q1 round, Hard with Nao Hibino getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:23:53.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Hibino and Hozumi have played a deciding set 0 times, with Hibino winning 0 times and Hozumi 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Hibino winning 0, and Hozumi 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hibino has played against opponents with an average rank of 202.28 while Hozumi has played against players with an average rank of 217.29.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hibino has won 59% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hozumi has won 100% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hibino has converted 48.73% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hozumi has converted 61.29% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Hibino 7 - 3 Hozumi
85
Rank
56
High
29
Age
R
Plays
7
Total3
6
Hard2
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
1
Grass1
871
Rank
144
High
30
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
Form
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
56% (368-293)
Career Total W/L
53% (295-259)
56% (14-11)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$1,225,315
Career Prize Money
$174,441
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Nao Hibino | Eri Hozumi |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 7 | 3 |
| Sets Won | 14 | 6 |
| Games Won | 109 | 75 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 10 | 9 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:23:53 | 0:23:53 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (114/187) | 62% (114/183) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 65% (74/114) | 51% (58/114) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 52% (38/73) | 42% (29/69) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 53% (16/30) | 44% (7/16) |
| Return Points W% | 51% (63/123) | 39% (47/122) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 70% (7/10) | 30% (3/10) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (7/7) | 100% (3/3) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (7/0) | 0% (3/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (3/0) | 0% (7/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-3 |
Stats 
Nao Hibino
Player
Eri Hozumi
53%
(
39 of
73)
1st Serve %
60%
(
42 of
70)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
44%
(
32 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
37 of
70)
78
Total Points Won
65
|
||||
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Eri Hozumi
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
||||
| 6-3 6-3 | |||||
| 6-2 7-5 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Eri Hozumi
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve %
70%
(
42 of
60)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
28 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
||||
| 6-3 6-1 | |||||
| 6-4 6-4 | |||||
| 6-4 6-1 | |||||
| 6-2 6-4 | |||||
| 6-3 7-6(4) | |||||
| 6-1 6-2 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Nao Hibino | Eri Hozumi |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 56% (14/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 51% (32/31) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (290/274) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 55% (12/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 100% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.17 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 46 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.23 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 64 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:45:28 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 146.56 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (1239/1842) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 63% (778/1239) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (276/603) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 47% (102/218) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (815/1869) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 67% (8/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 56% (14/25) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 40% (2/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 69% (9/13) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 75% (12/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 25% (12/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 38% (13/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Nao Hibino Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Elena Gabriela Ruse
Player
Nao Hibino
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
61%
(
25 of
41)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 3 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Yulia Putintseva
74%
(
77 of
104)
1st Serve %
71%
(
70 of
99)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
62%
(
48 of
77)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
43 of
70)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
42%
(
44 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
99)
103
Total Points Won
100
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Anna Danilina
80%
(
35 of
44)
1st Serve %
69%
(
27 of
39)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
54
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jule Niemeier
Player
Nao Hibino
65%
(
84 of
130)
1st Serve %
71%
(
70 of
98)
6
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
2
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
46 of
70)
46%
(
21 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
46%
(
60 of
130)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
98)
112
Total Points Won
116
|
7-6(5) 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Erika Andreeva
Player
Nao Hibino
62%
(
54 of
87)
1st Serve %
70%
(
74 of
105)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
49 of
74)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
32 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
105)
95
Total Points Won
97
|
2-6 7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Harriet Dart
72%
(
66 of
92)
1st Serve %
46%
(
42 of
91)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
9
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
40%
(
37 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
91)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Veronika Kudermetova
Player
Nao Hibino
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
52%
(
30 of
58)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
73
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Venus Williams
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve %
62%
(
57 of
92)
1
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
10
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
43%
(
26 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
47 of
92)
82
Total Points Won
71
|
2-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Su-Wei Hsieh
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
23 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
2-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Julia Riera
54%
(
50 of
92)
1st Serve %
47%
(
43 of
91)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
45%
(
41 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
44 of
91)
95
Total Points Won
88
|
6-3 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Eri Hozumi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Lina Glushko
Player
Eri Hozumi
64%
(
56 of
87)
1st Serve %
69%
(
48 of
70)
8
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
35 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
70)
82
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Destanee Aiava
Player
Eri Hozumi
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
72%
(
49 of
68)
2
Aces
1
-
Double Faults
-
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eri Hozumi
Player
Shiho Akita
72%
(
69 of
96)
1st Serve %
65%
(
59 of
91)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
65%
(
45 of
69)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
41 of
59)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
39%
(
37 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
37 of
91)
96
Total Points Won
91
|
3-6 6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Eri Hozumi
Player
Beatrice Gumulya
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve %
47%
(
17 of
36)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
88%
(
7 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
51
Total Points Won
19
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Eri Hozumi
Player
Rianna Alame
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
58)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
7
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
33%
(
5 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
40%
(
16 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Arianne Hartono
Player
Eri Hozumi
53%
(
31 of
59)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
2
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
7
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
46%
(
27 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Robin Anderson
Player
Eri Hozumi
47%
(
30 of
64)
1st Serve %
59%
(
39 of
66)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Eri Hozumi
Player
Emma Lella
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve %
49%
(
33 of
67)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
9
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
26 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tatiana Prozorova
Player
Eri Hozumi
49%
(
26 of
53)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Hibino Vs Hozumi Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
